Originally Posted by
Kacee
And the fact the offer was nominally framed as sale of "advice" rather than sale of a GPU is pretty much conclusive evidence that the seller knew sale of a GPU is improper.
Yep. This turns what might possibly have been a "two strike" issue into a "one strike" issue. Not only
should a GS know better, UA has proof that they
did in fact know better and did it anyway.