Originally Posted by
NiceLanding
I keep wondering if UA's lack of non-institutional ownership, less than 4% vs. an industry average of 42%, is the cause or the result of market expectations being skewed. Maybe it's easier for them to convince a small number of key analysts to believe in their strategy than it would be with a broader distribution of shareholders.
Industry average of 42%?
What industry are you referring to, or was this a rectilinear calculation?
Inst Ownership %
UAL: 97%
ALK: 99%
LUV: 82%
DAL: 91%
I don't know how this is possible, but according to NASDAQ JBLU is 102% institutional owned...
AAL is too new (?) to have ownership listed.