saaru

This is from WikiPedia on liquidated damages:
"At common law, a liquidated damages clause will not be enforced if its purpose is to punish the wrongdoer/party in breach rather than to compensate the injured party (in which case it is referred to as a penal or penalty clause).[2] One reason for this is that the enforcement of the term would, in effect, require an equitable order of specific performance. However, courts sitting in equity will seek to achieve a fair result and will not enforce a term that will lead to the unjust enrichment of the enforcing party.[3]
In order for a liquidated damages clause to be upheld, two conditions must be met:
First, the amount of the damages identified must roughly approximate the damages likely to fall upon the party seeking the benefit of the term.[2]
Second, the damages must be sufficiently uncertain at the time the contract is made that such a clause will likely save both parties the future difficulty of estimating damages.
"

Based on that, I don't think the 1000 fee for a flight for no-show on a 100 dollar ticket or a 400 dollar charge on 100 dollar night fees should stand legal scrutiny? Valid? They are compensated by the 8K points - there are no additional losses to the hotel if I don't show up.