Originally Posted by
DaviddesJ
According to SeatGuru, the 764 is the most cramped of the three. Of course, that doesn't mean it's necessarily true.
http://www.seatguru.com/airlines/Uni...767_400_ER.php
The only one I've flown is the 777. I thought it was quite comfortable. Definitely way better for a domestic transcon than anything else that exists. I haven't flown the PS route with the upgraded planes, but I've flown EWR-SFO on what happened to be the Intl 752, which I think has the same seats as the PS, and they were much better than the VX product or any of the alternatives I've encountered.
http://www.seatguru.com/airlines/Uni...7-200_Flat.php
I do think UA's claim to have the best product (for now, if you get the right plane) is valid.
I dislike the VX premium hard product. I know people rave and fawn, but it wasn't for me. I find the seat uncomfortable. Great atmosphere though.
Many posters on the forum are fans of wide-body domestic flights. However they are far from standard offerings and should not be compared to other products as if they were.
In general I find the sCO flatbed seat does not help facilitate better sleep than the seat(s) it is replacing, which is a shame. I should mention that I have yet to fly the new PS configuration. I am speaking based on my experience on the sCO 757 BF seats. I do believe they are exactly the same as the new PS seats.