View Single Post
Old Jan 19, 13, 4:25 am
  #12  
chinatraderjmr
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai / NYC
Programs: EK-IO, UA-1K2MM, ETIHAD-GOLD, SPG-PLAT LIFETIME, JUMEIRAH SERIUS GOLD
Posts: 5,220
Originally Posted by UrbaneGent View Post
If you are talking about the MM lawsuit, you dont see any printed facts about whatever the issues you mentioned above because it has nothing to do with that case. The case is not meant to screw anything up for anyone.

The case strictly involves PMUA MMilers and those who were close to it BEFORE the merger. Plain and simple. No SWUs for the sig other, etc.

How do I know? It's been talked about ad nauseum on here in two places.

UG
+1
No where does it say anything in the suit about SWU's for MM companions. There is no pending litigation as far as I know about this. Anyone who has read the MM lawsuit would know that not only does it not mention SWU's for companions, but actually questions the whole companion benefit - the suit, as far as what I can tell just asks for what we were promised for years. The companion benefit itself is questioned as an unfair trade for what we were promised (maybe I'm reading to much into it)
chinatraderjmr is offline