Originally Posted by
restlessinRNO
Fredd - I am in complete agreement with you.
I've felt from the outset that highlighting as an
enhancement this
significant other benefit was ill-thought-out by UA. The unintended consequence is that UA is
discriminating against "single" flyers not claiming a spousal-type
significant other, and discriminating
doubly against those of us who fly in pairs.
Furthermore, one common definition of
significant other includes
any person who is important to an individual's well-being. Does UA management really want to be reduced to having to argue that its own limiting definition supersedes this?
That's why I'm hoping UA does the right thing and quickly amends this policy to one that is inclusive rather than discriminatory by including, at the least, some meaningful choices for Million Mile Flyers. @:-)