Originally Posted by
TSORon
Nice set of opinions there halls. But that’s all they are, and we both know it. And your welcome to them, after all that’s what our country is all about, right?
As for this federal court case, well you are going to need to be a bit more specific.
"TSA search for contraband was invalid as not a search for items prohibited from airplanes. The search continued after it was apparent that there were no prohibited items. United States v. Fofana, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45852 (S.D. Ohio June 2, 2009)"
Is that specific enough for you, Ron?
Originally Posted by
TSORon
I don’t believe that’s what I said halls. Nice assumption though. But in any case, we will never know if the TSA’s procedures could have prevented the attacks of 9/11. So stating that it is a lie is in itself a lie, because you don’t know, you only have a theory. Again, nice assumption though.
You clearly implied it, Ron. While I don't
know if TSA's procedures would have prevented 9/11, I do know what made the attacks successful - the lack of hardened cockpit doors, and the policy in place at the time which prevented airline crews from resisting a hijacking.
That is why the hijacking were successful, Ron. Not lax gate security. No matter how many times you imply otherwise.
Originally Posted by
TSORon
Depending on the venue, NASA could be the “second most dislike agency in government”, or Child Protective Services, or the EPA, or the NTSB, or gee any of them. Your claim has no meaning, and could therefore also be seen as a lie. Gee halls, seems your facination with unfounded beliefs gets you deeper and deeper into that hole you keep digging.
In December, in a survey by The Associated Press of public attitudes toward 12 federal agencies, the T.S.A. and the Internal Revenue Service tied for second place as the two most disliked, behind only the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Sorry, Ron, I'm not making this stuff up. Now just who is digging a hole for themselves?
