Originally Posted by
blort
I'm not sure it is either, but until the agreement is made public, we'll never know. Rest assured that next time, I will use the word "possibly."
Meanwhile, my entire point was some customers benefit from the service and there do not appear to be any negative ramifications to the non-participants.
I'm not as optimistic as you are that this is a win-win deal, but without certain information being made public, we'll never know who is right.
Originally Posted by blort
And it's clearly not possible (there's that word!) that United is being reimbursed for the cost of those employees, right?
Of course it's possible, I just wouldn't presume (there's that word!) that's the case.
