The largest expert travel community:
  • 776,325 Total members
  • 5,917 Users online now
  • 1,732,233 Threads
  • 32,088,718 Posts

United Calls for Government Action as COVID-19 Pandemic Rages On

United Calls for Government Action as COVID-19 Pandemic Rages On
Joe Cortez

United Airlines is once again calling for government action to support the aviation sector, either through opening borders or additional cash support. Speaking on television, airline CEO Scott Kirby says without a plan to aid the travel sector, even more layoffs will come.

United Airlines wants the U.S. Government to take one of two options to help support the travel and aviation sector: come up with a plan to open borders in the COVID-19 pandemic, or help support airlines to keep employees on the payroll. Airline chief executive Scott Kirby took the call to action when appearing Sunday, Sept. 13, 2020, on CBS’ “Face The Nation.”

“People are not going to get back and travel like they did before until there’s a vaccine”

During his interview with moderator Margaret Brennan, Kirby said that although they have raised $18 billion in free-market capital, their fundraising is unsustainable at a burn rate of $25 million per day. Additionally, the predicted recovery at the start of the novel Coronavirus update is not happening – leading the airline to call for additional help.

“Our view is demand is not coming back,” Kirby said. “People are not going to get back and travel like they did before until there’s a vaccine that’s been widely distributed and available to a large portion of the population.”

The Payroll Support Program from the original CARES Act will expire on Oct. 1, 2020, and Congress has not acted towards a second stimulus bill that could help the aviation industry. Without government help, Kirby predicts “near-depression levels” will continue in the travel industry and associated businesses: hospitality, meetings and conventions and dining.

“Business travel is almost nonexistent as people are doing things like this [teleconferencing and virtual meetings] as they get through the pandemic,” Kirby said. “And even leisure travel is down significantly from where it was before.”

In addition to additional support to prevent the layoff of 16,000 employees, Kirby also noted that United and other airlines have continually asked the White House to work with other international governments to open up borders through on-arrival testing. Much like an additional support bill, there has been no traction that plan.

“People understand the importance to the economy,” said Kirby. “We just seem to be tied up in the larger Washington discussions about the future.”

Capacity Cuts Continue as Oct. 1 Deadline Looms

With layoffs looming, United is changing how they think about scheduling. Anticipating more travelers, the airline says they will fly 40 percent of their schedule compared to Oct. 2019. This also includes renewing eight routes to Hawaii, pending approval of the state’s pre-arrival COVID-19 testing program.

The route capacity is just one of the ways the airline is trying to encourage flyers to come back. The airline also notes they were the first to mandate face mask usage on flights, and were the first to eliminate change fees on certain tickets, which sparked an industry trend.

View Comments (2)


  1. sfoeuroflyer

    September 14, 2020 at 2:22 pm

    Why is everyone whistling past a good temporary solution? Want to open borders? Implement for all pax the rapid test that yields results in 5 minutes. Is it 100% perfect? No. But no test is. Yes, the cumbersome PCR test is a bit more accurate, but that takes days to get results. To be frank, the rapid test on balance is better than 1. closed borders; 2. quarantines; 3. tests that take days for results; 4 face masks. For a fraction of the hemorrhage of money being lost, this test could be implemented. People forget that perfect is the enemy of the good. Let’s go a for a good program since perfect is not available now.

  2. oh912flyer

    September 16, 2020 at 6:04 am

    sfoeuroflyer – The PCR test is less accurate, not more accurate, because it can’t tell the difference between a live virus and a dead one that your immune system has killed. Its one of the reason contact tracing is flawed, and why so many people “positive” after contact tracing are asymptomatic for their entire quarantine period. It’d be like using a PCR test to see if someone has the measles 24-48 hours after they’ve had a measles vaccine — they *will* show positive with a PCR test. The Antigen test may detect the *wrong* coronavirus, but at least it detects a *live* one only.

    That aside, I agree with you in part; the problem of course is the people not sick who test positive at the aiport … do you deny them boarding? And, more importantly, if you test negative, what’s the point of wearing the mask (or are we now going to say masks are to prevent you catching it after we’ve spent months telling people they to prevent the spread…)

You must be logged in on the FORUM to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply


More in Airlines

Singapore Airlines Considers “Flights to Nowhere” to Encourage Bookings

Joe CortezSeptember 15, 2020

European Carriers Send “Last Call” to Save Aviation During COVID-19

Joe CortezSeptember 15, 2020

Air Canada Starts Voluntary COVID-19 Arrival Testing

Joe CortezSeptember 14, 2020

Copyright © 2014 Top News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by Wordpress.


I want emails from FlyerTalk with travel information and promotions. I can unsubscribe any time using the unsubscribe link at the end of all emails