0 min left

The DOT Wants YOU to Weigh In on What Is (& Isn’t) a Service Animal

The U.S. Department of Transportation wants flyers to weigh in on a proposed change which would limit the scope of “service animal” aboard commercial aircraft. The suggested amendment to the Air Carrier Access Act would prohibit “emotional support animals” from flying as service animals and create stricter rules and documentation for those who wish to fly with their duly-trained animals.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) wants your opinion on changes to service animal rules, as they look to add stricter requirements to which four-legged companions can fly in the main cabin. The “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” was announced on Wednesday, Jan. 22, with comments open for the next 60 days. Interested flyers can submit a comment about the changes to the DOT at Regulations.gov, under docket number DOT-OST-2018-0068.

 

Proposed Changes to the Air Carrier Access Act

Under the current definition provided under the Air Carrier Access Act, a “service animal” is: “Any animal that is individually trained or able to provide assistance to a person with a disability; or any animal that assists persons with disabilities by providing emotional support.” Some flyers attempted to take the definition to the extreme, attempting to board flights with pigs and even a peacock.

The proposed DOT changes would severely limit who could fly with a “service animal,” and under what conditions. If approved, the changes would create two clear criteria for when an animal can fly as a service companion:

  • Service animals would be limited to “A dog that is individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of a person with a disability.”
  • “Emotional support animals” would no longer qualify to fly under the “service animal” definition.

The rule changes would allow force airlines to adopt DOT forms verifying the health, behavior, and training for a service animal. In addition, those flying with verified service animals would be forced to arrive at the airport at least one hour in advance of their flight time to “process the service animal documentation and observe the animals.”

However, the rule change falls short of banning any specific breed from the cabin. If adopted, airlines would be prohibited from “refusing to transport a service animal solely on the basis of breed.” But if that same animal displays aggressive or threatening behavior, the airline reserves the right to refuse transportation.

 

The Current Problem With Support Animals

The proposed changes come after a number of noted incidents over the past two years from “emotional support animals.” In Feb. 2019, an emotional support dog attacked a five-year-old girl at Portland International Airport, while an American Airlines flight attendant was bitten by a service animal on a July 2019 flight. According to veterinarians who spoke to FlyerTalk, emotional support animals are not necessarily trained to handle the stress of flying, resulting in misdirected acts of fear or aggression.

As “emotional support animals” became more popular, some groups expressed frustration with the current state of affairs. In Nov. 2019, over 80 organizations, including Leashes for Valor and the Association of Flight Attendants, signed a joint letter calling on the DOT to make changes.

While the rules were first drafted in Fall 2019, the public notice phase brings them closer to adoption. After receiving flyer feedback, the DOT will make a final decision on the change in the near future.

19 Comments
M
moeve February 3, 2020

@CEB the Problem is that many airlines simply do not fly pets anymore due to the issues. Best example was the soldier and his family who were posted to Japan and took their dog. 2 years later wenn being transferred back to CONUS there was no way to get the bigger dog back because Delta no longer accepted animals for the hold. As I said - find a way to do it safely and most of all at a reasonable price and most pet owners will be responsible. However if it is way too expensive or simply not possible there will be tooo many to „use“ this only option. I have transferred intercontinentally with pets before but I would truely hate to have to do it nowadays.

B
Brian-AAFlyer February 2, 2020

Interestingly, the DOT rules aren't compatible with the ADA, the ADA lists two animals that can be used, Dogs and Minature Horses.. By denying the Minis on flights, you'd be violating the ADA.. as odd as that may be.. Don't believe me, go check it out :)

S
SpudOz February 2, 2020

Thank God Australia does not put up with this crap. Certified service dogs only allowed to travel on aircraft.

D
Dalo January 30, 2020

Seeing eye dogs only.

E
EPtraveler January 30, 2020

I have a lifetime of 7 million miles. I've seen it all. I was on a JFK flight and there were 5 dogs. That is NOT safe. The way DOT has allowed airlines to put so many more seats on a plane and make everything so close together, they cannot have dogs on the floor in your row. Even getting out of your row to go to the bathroom is a big deal and with a dog on the floor it's just not safe if we have to get out quickly. I agree with Flying None above, if you have a psychological disorder maybe you need to fly with another human. Makes more sense. It is completely out of control and DOT really needs to get a handle on this. It's a workplace for FA and pilots. And, it jeopardizes everyone's safety.