0 min left

Southwest Airlines Facing Lawsuit After Refusing to Help Disabled Passenger

Wheelchair Service in Airport Terminal. Window View with Sunlight.

Southwest Airlines is facing a lawsuit after a woman in a wheelchair alleged employees refused to help her use the restroom, causing her to wet herself and suffer severe emotional and physical distress; she was flying from Portland International Airport to St. Louis, Missouri when the incident occurred.

Katherine E. Muenchow, 56, recently flew from Portland, Oregon, to St. Louis, Missouri, with Southwest Airlines—and is suing the company as a result. Muenchow uses a wheelchair and encountered nothing but problems with the flight, to the point where she was forced to wet her pants because the crew would not help her.

The problem started when she arrived at the airport and ordered a wheelchair, but the airport told her she needed to use her own. Then, as an attendant was wheeling her to the gate, she asked to stop and get some food—but the attendant refused, saying a Southwest attendant would take her. That person didn’t appear for an hour. Then Muenchow asked to be taken to a restroom. The attendant suggested the nearest women’s room, but it wasn’t able to fit the wheelchair, so Muenchow asked for a family restroom. The attendant said it was too far and she’d have to wait to use the restroom on the plane.

But the flight attendants on the plane wouldn’t help her either, first saying she couldn’t get up while the plane was boarding and next citing turbulence. Muenchow begged for assistance in tears. Eventually, she was forced to wet herself. She was finally taken to the restroom—too late—once the plane landed. But the door wouldn’t close all the way and she was forced to use the facilities in view of every passenger deplaning.

“Traveling is a time of great vulnerability for a disabled person who must rely on the assistance and accommodation of others,’’ the suit says, reported by Oregon Live. “The flight attendants’ conduct toward the plaintiff was outrageous and done with an intent to cause plaintiff severe emotional distress.’’

 

[Image Source: Shutterstock]

Comments are Closed.
7 Comments
M
mvoight July 19, 2019

Yes, we have common decency. As noted, if you need something other than movement through the airport, then bring someone to assist you.

S
secondsoprano June 6, 2019

Ugh , you people! Do you have no compassion or common decency? Really depressing how horrible all these comments are.

R
robsaw June 4, 2019

Opinion on what or what should not be expected is irrelevant. What is relevant is the law and contractually required levels of assistance required by the airport and airline. My understanding is that assistance to/from gate and aircraft and presumably to/from toilet facilities is required. Assistance with personal hygiene is not something required; if a person's disability requires that, then they need to have a personal assistant.

J
jonsail June 4, 2019

Let's hear from some lawyers. If a pax is physically unable to fly w/o assistance, is the airline liable if it doesn't provide every assistance? What assistance is it reasonable under the law for an airline to have to provide and what assistance is unreasonable for the airline to provide under law requiring accommodation of people with handicaps?

M
mrlasssen June 4, 2019

Who is responsible for the wheel chair attendants, I don’t remember seeing any with airline uniforms on, but rather a contractors shirt. Do they work for the airport and tips?