FBI Gets 37 Unruly Flyer Reports from FAA
Hand einer jungen Frau in Handschellen Hand of a young woman in handcuffs
However, the agency has only referred a very few to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for consideration for criminal charges. The Associated Press reports only 37 unruly passenger incidents have been handed over to the FBI for prosecution.
Unions and Lawmakers Push for Stronger Punishments for Bad Passengers
According to the latest data by the FAA, only 950 of the thousands of complaints have been investigated by the agency, with only 227 resulting in proposed fines. Because the FAA is a civil agency, they are unable to bring criminal charges against flyers.
With the dramatic increase in in-flight incidents, the agency began working with the FBI to investigate and refer situations for prosecution faster than before. Because the FBI has authority over the special aircraft jurisdiction of the U.S., they have the sole authority over commercial flights.
While the FAA has sent 37 incidents to the FBI for consideration, they did not say which cases were sent over, nor identify anyone who could be being investigated. Multiple messages from the FAA – in the form of public service announcements and memes – have warned flyers they could face fines, flying bans and possible arrest for acting out on airplanes.
Warning for unruly airline passengers! We are referring the most egregious cases to the @FBI for federal criminal prosecution consideration. This is a priority for both agencies. Learn more at https://t.co/ISiblzAzGi. @TheJusticeDept #FlySmart pic.twitter.com/hVroWfXEMa
— The FAA ✈️ (@FAANews) November 4, 2021
Although the move reinforces the rhetoric from the FAA, airline unions say there needs to be more action against poorly behaved travelers. In a press release, the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA said while the move was needed to , they want to see a national “do not fly” list created across all airlines.
“Our union continues to call for the creation of a centralized list of violators who will be denied the freedom of flight on all airlines,” said Sara Nelson, president of the AFA-CWA. “If a passenger physically assaults crewmembers or other passengers on one airline, they pose a risk to passengers and crew at every airline. They should be banned from flying on all airlines. Period.”
The call is seconded by a group of six House Democrats, who wrote a letter to attorney general Merrick Garland. The group asked the nation’s top legal officer to have the “incidents directed towards service agents should be recorded and acted upon by the Department of Justice.”
Renewed Calls Come After Assault Ends in Broken Nose
The renewed calls for stricter penalties comes after an American Airlines flight attendant suffered a broken nose after being punched twice by a passenger. The U.S. Department of Justice confirmed 20-year-old Brian Hsu of Irvine, California was charged with interference with a flight crew and assault on accusations of launching the assault.





So basically the airlines are doing what schools are doing today: absolutely as little as possible. Then they wonder why people are sprinting back to load up like sardines on flights. Throw these folks in jail and fine them to the max.
There's a word for private companies "banding together" - it's "collusion."
... and there's two words for private companies banding together, in the face of weak and ineffective law (and those who should be applying it), to protect their moderate and law abiding revenue flows (customers) ... "common sense". And perhaps a word for moderate and law abiding customers, "boycott" ... those airlines who repeatedly stand out as having difficulty in maintaining law compliance and convivial surroundings on their flights.
Oh, so we want due process from private companies banding together to keep disruptive louts from flying. Sorry, GYM, that's not how private commerce works. This is one grumpy old man who wants all such yahoos off commercial flights.
5000+ reports, only 227 fines, only 37 possible criminal cases...but let's create an internal list (likely with little/no due process) to ban folks from flying...terrible, terrible idea.
Also, it's likely illegal. But the discussion of doing it is designed to make more folks sit down and shut up and take the poor service offered.