The largest expert travel community:
  • 743,852 Total members
  • 6,510 Users online now
  • 1,686,447 Threads
  • 30,479,006 Posts
Opinion

Big Brother Is Watching: Should You Be Worried?

Big Brother Is Watching: Should You Be Worried?
Ariana Arghandewal

A Singapore Airlines passenger discovered a camera below his IFE but the airline claimed the cameras were not being used and that any privacy concerns were essentially unfounded. Then Buzzed published a story about American Airlines seats having seat back cameras as well. Followed by reports that Delta and United have the same feature installed. Of course, it did not go over well with travelers with legitimate privacy concerns. By now, we all know Big Brother is watching. So should we be concerned about seatback cameras?

That depends on whether you choose to believe the airlines’ PR line:

“[We’re] not considering using them”

The response from both American and Singapore Airlines was essentially the same. American Airlines claimed the cameras were installed by the manufacturer “for possible future use”, though they were not in use at the moment. Singapore Airlines had an almost identical response:

I find it hard to believe that IFE manufacturers would include cameras without the direction of the airlines. At the very least, it must have been a selling point. It’s not strange, in the current climate, for us to be filmed in our seats. Especially since our camera phones are getting tapped. But it is strange that the airline would pay for a security feature like an IFE camera and not use it. I call bull on this explanation. If the airline has no intention to use seatback cameras, why install them?

Privacy vs. Security

At the risk of sounding ultra-paranoid, I would point to the NSA surveillance program, which has been used for years to spy on American citizens as well as foreigners. As part of this mass surveillance program, law enforcement can tap into anyone’s cell phone, landline, and camera. On an airplane, where electronics are disabled, the workaround would be to tap into the seat back camera. So even if airlines choose not to utilize seat back cameras, they can still be hacked into for surveillance purposes by intelligence agencies. But do we need our privacy more than law enforcement might need to monitor criminal behavior?

“If you’re not doing anything wrong…”

One defense of these seat back cameras is, “If you’re not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about.” In itself, IFE cameras could be brushed off as another minor security measure meant to protect everyone on board. They could also be another step towards turning us into citizens of Oceania. Allowing small intrusions like this could lead to further privacy intrusions in the future.

So should you worry about seat back cameras possibly recording you? It’s definitely weird, even if you’re not “doing anything wrong.” It’s the principle – do we continue to accept privacy intrusions, whether by the government, corporations, or weirdos on the internet? At what point do we draw the line? On principle alone, I’m not ok with this. But I also know there’s nothing to be done about it.

We live in ultra-paranoid times where everything is a threat and the only way to deal with it is through constant surveillance. At least that’s what we’re told. We’ve become desensitized to privacy intrusions. If the idea of the NSA tapping into your laptop camera to watch you undress in your hotel room doesn’t freak you out, then the seat back cameras shouldn’t either. But if you’ve seen CitizenFour and have already applied a piece of tape over your laptop camera, you might want to bring an extra roll on your next flight.

How do you feel about airlines having seat back cameras?

[Image Source: Shutterstock]

View Comments (7)

7 Comments

  1. robsaw

    April 14, 2019 at 2:40 pm

    ” I find it hard to believe that IFE manufacturers would include cameras without the direction of the airlines. ”

    What a complete rubbish assertion. What that author “believes” is irrelevant. Conflated arguments that have no technical bearing on IF and HOW these IFE cameras could be used.

    A sensationalist, fact-devoid article – except for the fact that some IFE systems have cameras.

  2. amanuensis

    amanuensis

    April 14, 2019 at 6:21 pm

    I think there is too much paranoia here. I think the screens came with cameras because they build them that way by default. It is a lot simpler to use off-the-shelf components than to not.

  3. VegasGambler

    April 15, 2019 at 12:30 am

    Except, the cameras are off, so they are not watching. This is clickbait nonsense.

  4. Agremeister

    April 15, 2019 at 1:29 am

    If you’re so concerned about the camera, just stick a little tape over it I suppose.

  5. Counsellor

    April 15, 2019 at 7:40 am

    That’s “NSA surveillance program”, not NASA surveillance program.

    The “No Such Agency” runs it, not the moon-shot folks.

  6. BJM

    April 15, 2019 at 10:50 am

    Personal mobile devices with built in cameras have allowed all of us to become Big Brother.

  7. bostontraveler

    April 15, 2019 at 11:12 am

    Do people actually think AA, the airline that famously took an olive out of a salad to save money, would pay extra for camera functionality?
    If the camera is there, it’s there for a reason. Whether AA or the NSA paid for it somebody eventually will use them. I’m super boring to watch in general, but particularly so on planes… Now if what I am working on is being recorded it opens a whole host of issues.
    Am I convinced the NSA or AA or SQ are actively doing this? No. Could they? Absolutely yes.

You must be logged in on the FORUM to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

More in Opinion

How I Would Spend 1 Million Ultimate Rewards Points

Ariana ArghandewalApril 23, 2019

4 Airports That Need to Get their S— Together

Ariana ArghandewalApril 15, 2019

Why I Won’t Be Getting the New Apple Card

Caroline LupiniApril 10, 2019

Copyright © 2014 Top News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by Wordpress.