Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel News
Reload this Page >

Flight Attendant Co-pilots Plane

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Flight Attendant Co-pilots Plane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 12:29 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Vancouver
Programs: AE
Posts: 10,566
Flight Attendant Co-pilots Plane

OK, its not quite Karen Black in Airport 75:

A flight attendant with a commercial pilot's licence helped land an Air Canada jet in January after the co-pilot was removed from the cockpit following an emotional breakdown over the Atlantic Ocean, according to Ireland's Air Accident Investigation Unit.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl.../National/home
LeSabre74 is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 2:34 pm
  #2  
10 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TAS
Programs: A3*G, UA 1K
Posts: 9,252
They couldn't just let a pax do it?
Palal is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 3:19 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: yyz
Programs: Non-Rev Lifetime
Posts: 1,925
http://avherald.com/h?article=41050827

This story has legs.
PropWasher is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 8:54 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 465
The Flight Attendant had her commercial pilots license, but expired equipment cert. They did ask PAX before the Flight Attendant admitted to having her license. Pretty amazing. Good for her. Bad for him.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,455064,00.html
DontCallMeShirley is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 9:07 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: OKC/DFW
Programs: AA EXP/2 MM
Posts: 9,999
Originally Posted by DontCallMeShirley
Good for her. Bad for him.
Good for her, yes. But bad for him? I seriously doubt that the co-pilot was "bad" just for the heck of it. More likely there's a medical reason for his odd behaviour. Up until the incident the man had "...6,581 hours in total flying time, of which 3,173 hours were on the Boeing 767".

I'm glad the FA was able to fill in to help land the flight safely, but I am concerned for the the co-pilot. I hope that the cause of the problem can be discovered and is treatable. He and his family are in my prayers.
oklAAhoma is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 9:12 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag DYKWIA:SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night:Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,524
Official final report of the incident.
N965VJ is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 9:18 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 465
I did not mean that he was a "bad" person. I meant simply that it would be bad for his career that he has most likely worked to hard for. Sorry for the confusion, and I hope that he is better.

Originally Posted by oklAAhoma
Good for her, yes. But bad for him? I seriously doubt that the co-pilot was "bad" just for the heck of it. More likely there's a medical reason for his odd behaviour. Up until the incident the man had "...6,581 hours in total flying time, of which 3,173 hours were on the Boeing 767".

I'm glad the FA was able to fill in to help land the flight safely, but I am concerned for the the co-pilot. I hope that the cause of the problem can be discovered and is treatable. He and his family are in my prayers.
DontCallMeShirley is offline  
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 9:38 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: OKC/DFW
Programs: AA EXP/2 MM
Posts: 9,999
Originally Posted by DontCallMeShirley
I did not mean that he was a "bad" person. I meant simply that it would be bad for his career that he has most likely worked to hard for. Sorry for the confusion, and I hope that he is better.
Oops. Sorry for the misunderstanding; I should have given you the benefit of the doubt.

And back to the co-pilot... I agree this will not be good for his career. In fact, I am wondering if it won't be a career-ender. Poor guy.
oklAAhoma is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2008 | 5:18 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,389
Oh. I thought this was a variation of the "Mile High Club."

My mistake.
Bart is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 1:24 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: OOL Australia
Programs: QFF (Gold), Skywards, Rapid Rewards,United, Velocity, Hilton Silver
Posts: 2,440
If it had been American Airlines I would venture to say he had just got the latest report on his 401K
Lonely Flyer is offline  
Old Nov 22, 2008 | 5:54 pm
  #11  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: HYX
Programs: ~IHG(p)/BW~Nat'l.Exec~ ~NW(SE)~ ~Cessna~ NASM.do-07 ~AAAF.do-05/06/07/08/09
Posts: 1,530
Had seen several mentions of that 'expired equipment cert.' - - thanks for the AvHerald link to clarify (instrument currency).
Would I plunk an 'expired' but otherwise servicable pilot in the right-seat in that situation? In a farkin' heartbeat!

Wish there was better information on the FO's medical issues; sounds like a wacky allergic reaction.

/.
CaveatEmpty is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 5:26 am
  #12  
szg
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SZG, Austria
Programs: LH(OS) HON, IC RA
Posts: 33,193
Originally Posted by N965VJ
Thanks for the link ^
szg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.