PHX weather vs incompetence
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
PHX weather vs incompetence
I have flown US Air a few times through Phoenix and nothing was bad. Of course the weather was fine. And then last night there was a storm with lightning and all the flights were grounded.
(Of course, my background is mostly flying in California, where I expect no weather issues, and I realize that there was winter issues in most other parts of the country and many parts that have regular snow are used to dealing with it, and it is no big deal)
We landed (touched down) at 6:40pm and stood there in the runway, because nobody was moving. Because of the lightning. But planes started taking off later, and we still stood there. Apparently we couldn't get to our spot (I was flying a regional jet, our spot is just a spot on the tarmac, not a gate) because another plane was there. Every 10 minutes we'd move about 100 feet. Until finally a little after 8pm we were 10 feet away from the spot. But we still stopped there for 10 minutes.
I feel that is simply US Airways' incompetence. There was no plane in our spot. Maybe they had to move some stuff? That makes no sense to me, because if the other plane was just there, obviously there is an open spot.
From your experience at Phoenix, is everything horrible for every airline when there are weather issues, or is it just US Air?
(Of course, my background is mostly flying in California, where I expect no weather issues, and I realize that there was winter issues in most other parts of the country and many parts that have regular snow are used to dealing with it, and it is no big deal)
We landed (touched down) at 6:40pm and stood there in the runway, because nobody was moving. Because of the lightning. But planes started taking off later, and we still stood there. Apparently we couldn't get to our spot (I was flying a regional jet, our spot is just a spot on the tarmac, not a gate) because another plane was there. Every 10 minutes we'd move about 100 feet. Until finally a little after 8pm we were 10 feet away from the spot. But we still stopped there for 10 minutes.
I feel that is simply US Airways' incompetence. There was no plane in our spot. Maybe they had to move some stuff? That makes no sense to me, because if the other plane was just there, obviously there is an open spot.
From your experience at Phoenix, is everything horrible for every airline when there are weather issues, or is it just US Air?
#2
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sun Prairie, WI
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, HH Diamond, National Executive
Posts: 1,786
First off - weather at PHX is only an issue about a handful of days per year and when it is it impacts everyone. Why do you think this is a US Airways problem? This is an ATC problem who would be the group allowing or not allowing planes to move accordingly.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,458
I echo the previous poster. Fortunately, weather only affects PHX a few times per year. I have no idea why your plane couldn't move into its "spot". Perhaps a US employee at PHX can enlighten us. At the end of the day, it would be the operating carrier on an RJ, who makes the decisions (not US).
If it was Mesa, all bets are off. I have had "on-time" flights with Mesa where there is no gate agent at the podium. Finally, the pilot comes up into the gate area and tells us that we are waiting for a replacement FA. At the supposed departure time, there was still no GA and no FA. I finally went over to one of the other gates and pointed all this out to the agent. She was good enough to call and a GA showed up 5 minutes later.
If it was Mesa, all bets are off. I have had "on-time" flights with Mesa where there is no gate agent at the podium. Finally, the pilot comes up into the gate area and tells us that we are waiting for a replacement FA. At the supposed departure time, there was still no GA and no FA. I finally went over to one of the other gates and pointed all this out to the agent. She was good enough to call and a GA showed up 5 minutes later.
#4
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: SFO
Programs: WFBF
Posts: 963
If ATC doesn't allow planes to move, then planes don't move.
Sometimes that happens in weather situations; I've had more than my share of sitting on the tarmac at DCA, for example, when they decide to flip the airport, and I know there's nothing the airline can do about it.
Sometimes that happens in weather situations; I've had more than my share of sitting on the tarmac at DCA, for example, when they decide to flip the airport, and I know there's nothing the airline can do about it.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL, NYC
Programs: AA PLT, DL SLV, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH DIA
Posts: 10,065
Lightning on the tarmac also means ground crews stop working for safety reasons. That means nobody to marshall the plane into the parking spots and no crews to to unload the bags.
Did you take note if other airlines' planes were being ushered to their gates in an expeditious fashion or was this an airport wide delay due to weather?
Did you take note if other airlines' planes were being ushered to their gates in an expeditious fashion or was this an airport wide delay due to weather?
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
The reason I would ask if it were US (it was US Express so somebody else I guess) because some companies are more flexible, so would do things that aren't SOP when exceptional circumstances warrant (if as the poster notes weather is only an issue a handful of times a year I would call that exceptional).
#7
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sun Prairie, WI
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, HH Diamond, National Executive
Posts: 1,786
The reason I would ask if it were US (it was US Express so somebody else I guess) because some companies are more flexible, so would do things that aren't SOP when exceptional circumstances warrant (if as the poster notes weather is only an issue a handful of times a year I would call that exceptional).
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
Apparently at airports if there is lightning out the probability of being struck is much higher than non-airport locations.
If it isn't you are saying no reasonable person goes outside?
No, I am talking about flexibility
#9
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sun Prairie, WI
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, HH Diamond, National Executive
Posts: 1,786
It's the same reason that a number of events are postponed due to lightning - sporting events are a good example.
The fact is that your delay was not due to US unable to be flexible, it was due to an ATC delay. You can argue whether it was reasonable or not but the fact remains that it is a policy that all airlines and airports follow.
The fact is that your delay was not due to US unable to be flexible, it was due to an ATC delay. You can argue whether it was reasonable or not but the fact remains that it is a policy that all airlines and airports follow.
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
It's the same reason that a number of events are postponed due to lightning - sporting events are a good example.
The fact is that your delay was not due to US unable to be flexible, it was due to an ATC delay. You can argue whether it was reasonable or not but the fact remains that it is a policy that all airlines and airports follow.
The fact is that your delay was not due to US unable to be flexible, it was due to an ATC delay. You can argue whether it was reasonable or not but the fact remains that it is a policy that all airlines and airports follow.
#11
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sun Prairie, WI
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, HH Diamond, National Executive
Posts: 1,786
#12
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: US-CP, UA, Marriott Rewards, HHonors, Avis,
Posts: 4,549
While there are many reasonable residents of Phoenix who will go outside in a lightning storm, they generally are not walking around airplanes, luggage tugs, and all sorts of other equipment which can attract lightning. The level of caution considered reasonable for walking from a parking garage or across your back yard is not the same level of caution considered reasonable for a variety of different settings, including airports, construction sites, and sporting events. Being "flexible" on these lightning rules can get someone seriously injured or worse. If you are safely on the ground in your plane, then chill out and wait till conditions are safe for people to start doing their jobs again.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL, NYC
Programs: AA PLT, DL SLV, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH DIA
Posts: 10,065
Or....are you realizing that your original post was completely uniformed and subjective from your limited, myopic view from a seat in the back? Who do you suggest break the rules? The ground workers violate their work rules? The pilots violate FAA Ground Controller instructions? I'll tell you what..next time you don't want to wait, why don't YOU break the rules and open the door and just get off the plane by yourself?
#14
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
When there is lightning within 2 miles, all ramp activities stop and all personnel go inside. Ground crews can't uses electronic communications headsets if there's lightning within 3 miles. http://www.aviationpros.com/article/...htning-strikes
While there are many reasonable residents of Phoenix who will go outside in a lightning storm, they generally are not walking around airplanes, luggage tugs, and all sorts of other equipment which can attract lightning. The level of caution considered reasonable for walking from a parking garage or across your back yard is not the same level of caution considered reasonable for a variety of different settings, including airports, construction sites, and sporting events. Being "flexible" on these lightning rules can get someone seriously injured or worse. If you are safely on the ground in your plane, then chill out and wait till conditions are safe for people to start doing their jobs again.
While there are many reasonable residents of Phoenix who will go outside in a lightning storm, they generally are not walking around airplanes, luggage tugs, and all sorts of other equipment which can attract lightning. The level of caution considered reasonable for walking from a parking garage or across your back yard is not the same level of caution considered reasonable for a variety of different settings, including airports, construction sites, and sporting events. Being "flexible" on these lightning rules can get someone seriously injured or worse. If you are safely on the ground in your plane, then chill out and wait till conditions are safe for people to start doing their jobs again.
If lightning really is an issue then wouldn't it be smart to "fix it"?
My main question is whether any airlines are able to handle the weather delays. I presume some airlines are better able to handle things because they allow their employees to use their brains. I do not know why United was so affected by the flight control tower incident near Chicago recently and not American.
An example of flexibility-when that happened I was stranded at AUS. There was no way on United to get back. The gate agent walked over to look at the departure schedule and sent me off to American (after ensuring I had no checked baggage).
Was that an exceptional day? I would say burning flight control equipment doesn't happen often (I have never heard of it prior).
If everybody just follows the rules we should have robots.
#15
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: US-CP, UA, Marriott Rewards, HHonors, Avis,
Posts: 4,549
I guess it will be another 100 years before the lightning rod has been invented. Must have travelled back in time too much.
If lightning really is an issue then wouldn't it be smart to "fix it"?
My main question is whether any airlines are able to handle the weather delays. I presume some airlines are better able to handle things because they allow their employees to use their brains. I do not know why United was so affected by the flight control tower incident near Chicago recently and not American.
An example of flexibility-when that happened I was stranded at AUS. There was no way on United to get back. The gate agent walked over to look at the departure schedule and sent me off to American (after ensuring I had no checked baggage).
Was that an exceptional day? I would say burning flight control equipment doesn't happen often (I have never heard of it prior).
If everybody just follows the rules we should have robots.
If lightning really is an issue then wouldn't it be smart to "fix it"?
My main question is whether any airlines are able to handle the weather delays. I presume some airlines are better able to handle things because they allow their employees to use their brains. I do not know why United was so affected by the flight control tower incident near Chicago recently and not American.
An example of flexibility-when that happened I was stranded at AUS. There was no way on United to get back. The gate agent walked over to look at the departure schedule and sent me off to American (after ensuring I had no checked baggage).
Was that an exceptional day? I would say burning flight control equipment doesn't happen often (I have never heard of it prior).
If everybody just follows the rules we should have robots.
Last edited by dcpatti; Oct 20, 2014 at 3:01 pm