Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Just Witnessed US Accident at PHL [13 Mar 2014]

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2014, 7:31 am
  #76  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SJC
Programs: AA, AS, Marriott
Posts: 6,059
Originally Posted by GEXPO
Quite a few examples, including of deaths, in this 2004 report
I'm willing to give people the benefit of the doubt in these situations. Emotions are charged and adrenaline is flowing, so it's likely many of those who grabbed their bags were not thinking about their actions at the moment. Some may have had medications in their personal belongings that might not be immediately available. Others just do what they'd do in a normal evacuation of a building and grab their purse, backpack, or briefcase.
Majuki is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 7:41 am
  #77  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: FLL
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by Majuki
I'm willing to give people the benefit of the doubt in these situations. Emotions are charged and adrenaline is flowing, so it's likely many of those who grabbed their bags were not thinking about their actions at the moment. Some may have had medications in their personal belongings that might not be immediately available. Others just do what they'd do in a normal evacuation of a building and grab their purse, backpack, or briefcase.
You're more generous than I am. I think we've seen enough incidents like these to argue it's symptomatic of a lack of emphasis by flight crews to instruct passengers to leave stuff behind. A backpack, fine. A purse, fine. Two big bags like the woman in one of early pictures, or the kids each with backpacks is a conscious, life-endangering decision. Also hard for me to comprehend why so many people seem to react in the same way, by grabbing their bags.
GEXPO is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 7:47 am
  #78  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP / HH Diamond
Posts: 592
Perhaps they should add (back) "in the event of evacuation, leave all personal belongings behind" (or similar). I know it is (or at least was) on the safety card; but that reminder may be a good step.
Flyer78 is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 8:23 am
  #79  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: PHL
Programs: AA - Plat, HHonors - Diamond, IHG - Plat, Marriott - Gold, National - Exec, Amtrak - Select, NEXUS
Posts: 1,075
Originally Posted by heyeaglefn
Are there lots of cases where people died because they grabbed their backpack?
Even if there wasn't a specific example, do you agree that minimizing evac time is a key measure of effectiveness of aircraft evacuation? And that taking anything at all besides your person can only increase evac time?

I'm pretty sure I saw an Air Disasters that showed an incident where only some of the pax escaped before being overcome by smoke in a fire situation. I can't say that grabbing carry-ons was the cause there, but it illustrates that seconds do matter in such a situation.

I'm not sure what I would do in that situation, but I'm pretty sure that anyone reaching into the overhead would get a two-handed shove towards the doors from me or I would just bypass them if possible in the effort to save my skin.

This is especially true here since the pax in this incident thought the aircraft was on fire.
pa3lsvt is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 8:25 am
  #80  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Programs: US Airways Gold, Marriott Platinum, SW A List
Posts: 1,575
I was asking more about people grabbing backpacks under their seats, not opening overhead bins.
heyeaglefn is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 8:28 am
  #81  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SJC
Programs: AA, AS, Marriott
Posts: 6,059
Originally Posted by GEXPO
You're more generous than I am. I think we've seen enough incidents like these to argue it's symptomatic of a lack of emphasis by flight crews to instruct passengers to leave stuff behind.
While I haven't been in an aircraft evacuation, I was in a nearly fatal car crash about a decade ago. After the car stopped, the driver's side door got jammed shut, and I panicked and climbed out the rear passenger door even though this car had a bench front seat, and the passenger side was fine. I don't know what else could have been going through my mind other than problem = driver's side door, so opposite end of the car = no problem.

The accident happened at night, and I ended up about a quarter of the mile off of a 2-lane county road in a bare field in the middle of the night. I wasn't even sure the way the road was whereas a bystander would have just thought to walk the opposite direction of the way the car was facing.

Finally, I was trying to flag down people passing by to use their phones thinking mine was still in the car. After no friends and family were answering, I assumed it was because of the unfamiliar number. I ended up running back to the car with the paramedics to search for the phone, not realizing it was in my pocket the whole time.

The point of this story is that in these situations many people cease to think logically. While you think people carrying their suitcases is a willfully selfish and negligent act, I contend that many of these people rationalize these actions under duress without thinking.
Majuki is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 8:33 am
  #82  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: PHL
Programs: AA - Plat, HHonors - Diamond, IHG - Plat, Marriott - Gold, National - Exec, Amtrak - Select, NEXUS
Posts: 1,075
And some of the pax on US1702 had two bags with them after evac - clearly had to get something from the overhead. That's what burns me up, and as a PHL based traveler this hits home and makes it easier to imagine myself in their shoes.

I see your point heyeaglefn (and previous posters have mentioned the "a small bag, fine; a purse, fine" to which I agree somewhat given the medicine argument - as long as it doesn't delay evac), but the direction from the flight crew is "LEAVE EVERYTHING BEHIND!!!" and they are trained to yell that at pax during an evac. I'm doing just that if this ever happens to me. I don't have anything in my bags that I'm willing to risk anyone's life over.
pa3lsvt is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 8:46 am
  #83  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 462
Originally Posted by f0xx
Your report sites a fatty got stuck in the door with his/her bag. If said person wasn't fat, he/she would have fit through the door just fine.

Rule of the story? Don't be fat and you'll live.
Just one part of the report but still, LOL. . I agree that in the heat of the moment many people panic. It's very, very hard to say what you would do in a situation like that until you've been in it. I definitely will not blame the kids for grabbing their backpacks and running - maybe they were unaccompanied minors, regardless people should be directing the kids what to do. Seeing those kids is the scary part, thinking about them if this hadn't ended in a good result.

“One over-wing exit of a narrow-body airplane was blocked because a large passenger was carrying a bag, and the combination of the bag and body size caused the passenger to become stuck in the open hatch. Initially the passenger would not let go of the bag. A flight attendant on the wing was able to get this passenger out the exit; [and,]
lizs is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 8:54 am
  #84  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: WAS
Programs: SPG Plat. Marriott Plat. Hilton Diamond. Hyatt Diamond. IHG Plat.
Posts: 2,580
Originally Posted by lizs
Just one part of the report but still, LOL. . I agree that in the heat of the moment many people panic. It's very, very hard to say what you would do in a situation like that until you've been in it. I definitely will not blame the kids for grabbing their backpacks and running - maybe they were unaccompanied minors, regardless people should be directing the kids what to do. Seeing those kids is the scary part, thinking about them if this hadn't ended in a good result.

“One over-wing exit of a narrow-body airplane was blocked because a large passenger was carrying a bag, and the combination of the bag and body size caused the passenger to become stuck in the open hatch. Initially the passenger would not let go of the bag. A flight attendant on the wing was able to get this passenger out the exit; [and,]
I have to admit. As I flying through the report, it was the first thing I seen and almost choked on my coffee.
f0xx is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 9:35 am
  #85  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: 6E Westbound, 4E Eastbound
Programs: AA EXP & 3MM, Priority Club Plat since 1984
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by phlwookie
Yeah, what happened over there, anyway? I saw a bunch of fire vehicles there but with all the other activity just assumed it was a command post for the US 1702 incident. But now that you mention this I do recall the A-West US Club starting to make AA boarding announcements around 7:30 or 8pm and I thought that odd but I know the AC closes relatively early in the evening as AA-operated departures taper off.
In a notebook in the basement of the airport is a situational model of the blast range of a fully fueled and loaded craft of this make and model. The terminal fell in the shrapnel zone and was evacuated.
Thumper is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 9:37 am
  #86  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
For everyone who is ready to issue life without parole to the "selfish" passengers who took their carryons and/or personal items with them, relax. This plane wasn't on fire, and nobody died or was even injured because of their selfishness. It might have mattered if things had turned out differently, but it this crash landing, it didn't make a difference.

In the OZ crash last July, that plane did in fact burn up and many passengers were shown carrying their carryon/personal items. While there were deaths in that crash, none of those deaths resulted from the selfish passenger behavior.

This may be a good example of "if you haven't experienced it yourself (surviving a crash landing and rushed evacuation)" then you might not be the most understanding person to pass judgment on those who did experience it and selfishly carried their suitcases and laptops off the plane.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 9:58 am
  #87  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WAS, LAX
Programs: AS 100K
Posts: 1,330
Geez, how about we show a little humanity? I'd be willing to make a very substantial bet that the majority of people in an airline crash experience shock or panic. What they do after the crash isn't necessarily a result of ordinary thought processes.

I'm not saying everyone should get a pass, but if YOU were just in an airline crash, would you be completely right in the head? I'm guessing not.
flyingmusicianlax is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 9:58 am
  #88  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: 6E Westbound, 4E Eastbound
Programs: AA EXP & 3MM, Priority Club Plat since 1984
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
So your backpack is more important than your life?
he asked the twenty year Air Force veteran.

Very harshly worded question, not sure why. The fact of the matter is, I have had training on how to walk away from these types of successful landings. You evaluate what is going on then act accordingly. Based on the descriptions of the situation, and perhaps like those who have never seen it to know how they would react, I believe I would have grabbed my backpack.
Thumper is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 9:59 am
  #89  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: FLL
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by FWAAA
For everyone who is ready to issue life without parole to the "selfish" passengers who took their carryons and/or personal items with them, relax. This plane wasn't on fire, and nobody died or was even injured because of their selfishness. It might have mattered if things had turned out differently, but it this crash landing, it didn't make a difference.

In the OZ crash last July, that plane did in fact burn up and many passengers were shown carrying their carryon/personal items. While there were deaths in that crash, none of those deaths resulted from the selfish passenger behavior.

This may be a good example of "if you haven't experienced it yourself (surviving a crash landing and rushed evacuation)" then you might not be the most understanding person to pass judgment on those who did experience it and selfishly carried their suitcases and laptops off the plane.
Does it matter that in this case it didn't make a difference? Must we wait until there is conclusive evidence that a passenger with a carry-on caused a death to take the issue up?

Not trying to sound alarmist but regardless of whether I've experienced an evacuation, seeing the attitude of passengers taking bags is concerning to me if only in the off chance I do happen to have to evacuate a plane in the future.
GEXPO is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 11:15 am
  #90  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: DFW
Programs: AA EXP, SPG Platinum, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 383
Originally Posted by mbece
Will do -if I don't get killed by one of these bozos thinking their $1000 in crap is more important than peoples' lives.
+1
pindento is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.