US miles as low as 1.1cpm (DM Multiplier promo)
#78
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DEN
Programs: DL PM, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,816
#79
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Programs: Amex Centurion
Posts: 202
Why blast TPG? Info has been on FT since Aug 16th. I hardly call a 6 page thread high vis. Maybe its just not a "once in a lifetime" deal
Last edited by LynchMob; Sep 6, 2012 at 12:40 pm
#80
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SEA
Posts: 398
Whatever here for the 6 pages was not that detailed enough as far as holding the hand goes. Hopefully, not many people have enough credit lines to buy multiple J tickets.
#81
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PIT
Programs: Marriott Platinum, USDM Gold, National Exec Elite, IHG Dumped-now Kettle, SPG Platinum
Posts: 1,787
#83
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: STL
Programs: US Silver, AA Gold
Posts: 509
Hopefully if they do anything, it is just adjust the pricing. It is silly that the double and triple can cost the same.
#84
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: PHL
Programs: Former long-time US GP; now AA dirt
Posts: 4,904
#85
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Programs: Amex Centurion
Posts: 202
He deserves to be blasted because he (1) posted the info as if HE had thought it up, even though he almost certainly got the info from this thread and (2) has the audacity to write in his comment section that he "wouldn't be surprised" that some of the posts earlier in this thread from people having trouble getting their miles were just fabrications to prevent others from taking advantage of the promo and having the promo shut down.
2) Numerous posts to this thread have claimed that USAir has suspended accounts for abusing this offer yet no one has claimed that their account has actually been suspended. This would not be the first time in FT history that posters have discouraged others from taking advantage of a good find.
3) Why does it upset you that a blogger is informing his readers of current offers? Why did the OP make a thread if he didn't want others to get in on the deal? IMO bloggers like TPG and others sort through the best of what is out there for those that don't have the time to read every FT thread.
#86
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: PHL
Programs: Former long-time US GP; now AA dirt
Posts: 4,904
Worse, TPC words it this way: "You can also read this Flyertalk thread to get more inside scoop on the Miles Multiplier." More inside scoop??? As if his blog entry was an inside scoop to begin with? It's just garbage.
2) Numerous posts to this thread have claimed that USAir has suspended accounts for abusing this offer yet no one has claimed that their account has actually been suspended. This would not be the first time in FT history that posters have discouraged others from taking advantage of a good find.
3) Why does it upset you that a blogger is informing his readers of current offers? Why did the OP make a thread if he didn't want others to get in on the deal? IMO bloggers like TPG and others sort through the best of what is out there for those that don't have the time to read every FT thread.
Bloggers who consolidate info AND properly attribute their sources provide a great service. However, bloggers who act as if they're clever and create these great miles/points "plans" without proper attribution deserve to be exposed.
#87
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 2,611
If you can do a better job blogging do so. The correct way to attribute a source in grammar is at the end...
#88
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: PHL
Programs: Former long-time US GP; now AA dirt
Posts: 4,904
That's half of your rebuttal? Seriously?
"In grammar" means...???
A blogger acts as a reporter -- or an opinion writer. Sometimes both. Proper reporting dictates that the source of garnered info is to be attributed immediately so that the reader understands -- again, immediately -- that the blogger's words are not his original thoughts or beliefs. Anything less is misrepresentation.
"In grammar" means...???
A blogger acts as a reporter -- or an opinion writer. Sometimes both. Proper reporting dictates that the source of garnered info is to be attributed immediately so that the reader understands -- again, immediately -- that the blogger's words are not his original thoughts or beliefs. Anything less is misrepresentation.
#89
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,031
http://thepointsguy.com/2012/08/amaz...es-multiplier/
TPG pretty much copied everything from FT right down to the bloody route - SFO-TLV - saying "I recommend booking...". What are the odds he found the same route independently? If you want to argue grammar (ironic since you say "in grammar"), proper form is to put a footnote or an endnote where you are copying material. Not some "more reading on FT" BS at the bottom when you have clearly copied the essence of your post from FT.
When I pointed this out to "The Points Guy" he had the gall to claim that he "did his own research":
I added the risk, but the audit has not been an issue and theres nothing that violates the T&C by getting miles via this method. I sourced the FT post, but I did not find out about htis 50% bonus via FT- I got na email from US and did my own research.
#90
Join Date: Dec 2010
Programs: US CP, MR Plat, SPG Plat, HHonors Gold, National X
Posts: 917
More importantly, what shows that he is ignorant and potentially dangerous for his readers is the fact that he encourages them to book refundable tickets to take advantage of the multiplier. Booking refundable tickets with no intention to fly is a red-red-red flag for airlines, as it takes away valuable inventory. Moreover, it increases the price of the tickets for the rest of us!!
So one would expect that airlines would (and should) go hard on people that abuse it. Thankfully, booking refundable tickets just to take advantage of the multiplier is easily traceable. The sad part is that most of the people that will have their accounts audited will be people that just put faith on an "alleged" expert that is as ignorant as they are, regarding how airlines act.
In a comment that was removed by the TPG's blog i cited two threads from FT that refer to the abuse of the option to cancel of refundable tickets (I am sure they are many more).
Maybe it will be useful for some to take a look:
Phantom fare to Ensure Upgrade Availability
Phantom Fare to Ensure Empty Seat Next to You