Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Partner EQM award changes (UA quietly changed some partner Y/B fares 150%->100%)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Partner EQM award changes (UA quietly changed some partner Y/B fares 150%->100%)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2013, 2:36 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LHR (sometimes CLE, SFO, BOS, LAX, SEA)
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 5,893
Partner EQM award changes (UA quietly changed some partner Y/B fares 150%->100%)

It looks like some of the more generous 150% EQM for Y/B fares on partners that UA inherited from sCO after 3/3 have been reverted to the more stingy 100%.

If you're counting your EQM in 2013, you may want to check your itineraries on partner carriers in Y/B and rebook if needed. See discussion at http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/19961514-post16.html :

Originally Posted by N515CR
Ya, TK was 150 when I made that post on Dec 10, as were NZ, Croatia, EgyptAir, LOT, SQ, SA, TAM, TAP, and TG. This is a massive fml, and a change I DEFINITELY don't like.
I'm pretty sure that TK Y/B earned 150% a few months ago and are now 100% EQM. I now need to rebook a FRA-IST segment onto LH (which still credits 150% to UA). (Edit: I'm wrong -- TK Y/B was always 100% in 2012. I was confused because UA shouldn't have booked FRA-IST onto a LH flight number operated by TK in the first place.)

Same story with SQ -- used to be 150%, now 100%.

As a reminder, if you're curious how many MileagePlus miles will be earned for travel on an airline partner and don't know where to look, go to united.com -> MileagePlus->Earn Award Miles -> Learn more about airline partners, then click on a partner airline's logo. Here's TK, for example: http://www.united.com/CMS/en-US/mark...spx?ItemId=306

Last edited by mherdeg; Jan 3, 2013 at 3:54 pm
mherdeg is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 2:54 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ATL
Programs: DL DM 1.77MM, Marriott LT Plat
Posts: 2,784
PMUA was very stingy in this regard...it was only the JV airlines and US that gave a 150% CoS bonus.

It's odd that this seemed to change for just a few months only to revert back. Looks like they exercised the "United Airlines® and Singapore Airlines reserve the right to change the eligible fare classes at any time without notice" clause...
N515CR is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 3:05 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: IAD
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 292
Huge change for South African earnings. I got 150% RDM/PQM and 1.5 PQS on a Q fare a few months ago, now it's down to 100% and 1 segment. The low fare buckets remain at 50%, but have dropped to 0 segments. It's a shame, as there is a huge price difference between fares in the two buckets.
IADOrange is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 3:08 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 535
I am booked in R (Suites) class on SQ 2 in several weeks and now I'll be earning 100% PQM versus 150% Not happy about this change!
Robert is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 4:50 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: TPE
Programs: UA Gold, HA Premier, Hertz #1 Gold PC, SBUX Gold
Posts: 603
As a PMUA flyer this was a change Jeff was right about my liking last year, but not now! I definitely made use of this flying TPAC Y and B fairs on CA's new international 773ER service from LAX to PEK and appreciated the PQM bonuses for sure.

Update: I mispoke in this post. I had a wacky mixed metal/codeshare trip back in the spring with UA and CA and did indeed have several Y and B fares in the intinerary, but I went back and checked my statement and did not earn bonus PQMs for these on CA metal, only on the UA sectors. I stand corrected on this. Since it isn't one of the carriers in the list of changes, I think CA was always just at 100% PQM for Y and B.

Last edited by gradsflyer; Jan 3, 2013 at 3:50 pm Reason: Accuracy update
gradsflyer is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 4:52 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ATL
Programs: DL DM 1.77MM, Marriott LT Plat
Posts: 2,784
Originally Posted by mherdeg
It looks like some of the more generous 150% EQM for Y/B fares on partners that UA inherited from sCO after 3/3 have been reverted to the more stingy 100%.
Looks like F/C cabin fares have also been affected. I was really excited about the NZ CoS bonus for LAX-LHR flights...major deflation

Originally Posted by Robert
I am booked in R (Suites) class on SQ 2 in several weeks and now I'll be earning 100% PQM versus 150% Not happy about this change!
I'm in the same boat...on SQ38 SIN-LAX in March (along with some TG flights) and was expecting to bank a serious chunk of PQMs, then they went and changed things.
N515CR is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 5:11 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: TPE
Programs: UA Gold, HA Premier, Hertz #1 Gold PC, SBUX Gold
Posts: 603
Maybe Shannon will be able to chime in with this thread about the changes and at least provide some sort of explanation.
gradsflyer is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 5:17 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Gold-MM, AA Gold-MM, F9-Silver, Hyatt Something, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,392
Originally Posted by gradsflyer
Maybe Shannon will be able to chime in with this thread about the changes and at least provide some sort of explanation.
Do you expect her to be able to put a positive spin on this?

Face it, when airlines merge, customers get the worst of both worlds.....
hobo13 is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 5:21 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 123
Originally Posted by Robert
I am booked in R (Suites) class on SQ 2 in several weeks and now I'll be earning 100% PQM versus 150% Not happy about this change!
Does it matter that the rate was 150% at date of booking? Seems not quite fair to apply change to flights already booked.
wdrg is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 5:23 pm
  #10  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,850
Originally Posted by wdrg
Does it matter that the rate was 150% at date of booking? Seems not quite fair to apply change to flights already booked.
Fair seems to be an odd word to use concerning an airline.
Always has been the rules at time of flight prevail.

The real question is did UA change the benefit or was it the partners (probably in response to fees charged by UA). It has always been may understanding is the partners have the final decision of flight mileage although UA can influence it strongly per the deals they make with the partners.
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 5:36 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 123
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
Fair seems to be an odd word to use concerning an airline.
...
Well, you've got me there! I know better than that.
wdrg is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 6:00 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by hobo13
Do you expect her to be able to put a positive spin on this?
Check back at 7pm on Friday.

This does seem to be a general trend across many airlines and broadly speaking, I think UA has been on the generous side compared with some others I've looked at, so it only makes sense they'd pull back to solidify their position as being worst across all measures.
FlyWorld is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 6:00 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 210
Looks like Turkish Airlines G code is still listed at 100% PQM/Miles despite difficulties getting Turkish Airlines to grant miles for this fare code.
syzygy is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 6:25 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: TPE
Programs: UA Gold, HA Premier, Hertz #1 Gold PC, SBUX Gold
Posts: 603
Originally Posted by hobo13
Do you expect her to be able to put a positive spin on this?

Face it, when airlines merge, customers get the worst of both worlds.....
Not necessarily a positive spin, but at least an explanation. It's when they make unannounced changes to MP that I tend to get frustrated. Of course the whole 2012 program came without as much advanced notice as it could have.
gradsflyer is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013, 6:33 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New York
Programs: Bonvoy LifetimeTitanium, UA Plat 2MM, LHW LeadersClub, IHGPlat, HiltonDiamnd, ASMVPG100K, WyndDiamnd
Posts: 1,227
Not very happy at all. Some advance notice would have been reasonable and fair. I have TG (Thai) flights scheduled this month in Business and was counting on 150% PQM. Too late to change my plans.

Last edited by Nevsky; Jan 3, 2013 at 5:33 pm
Nevsky is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.