Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UA to move 777 heavy maintenance to China

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2005, 11:48 am
  #1  
Dub
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Programs: UA 1K, 2MM
Posts: 956
UA to move 777 heavy maintenance to China

"BEIJING, Aug. 30 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- United Airlines (BULLETIN BOARD: UALAQ) and Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Corporation (Ameco Beijing) signed a five-year agreement to conduct airframe heavy maintenance for United Airlines' Boeing 777 fleet.

Over the next five years, United Airlines' Boeing 777 fleet will go to Ameco Beijing for heavy maintenance visits (HMV). More than 50 HMV's are planned for the first three years, and as many as 80 will be completed over the contractual period. Based on this plan, Ameco Beijing will begin heavy maintenance work on the first five aircraft nose to tail starting this October. ...... "

Full details at http://www.industrywatch.com/pages/i...Manufacturing&

Dub is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 11:56 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: Nah.
Posts: 13,967
It is saves UA money and does not compromise safety, I think it is a good move. The wording of the article seems to indicate that the 777's are going in for D-checks... are they that old already?

I can't imagine the Mechanics union is going to be too happy about this though...
qasr is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 11:58 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco
Programs: UA 1K MM, Marriott
Posts: 1,740
Interesting. Ameco is a joint venture between Air China (60%) and Lufthansa German Airlines (40%).

I wonder if that means Air China might eventually join Star Alliance (I don't remember the current rumors).

While it sucks to see more offshoring, obviously United Services or any other US based provider couldn't be as competitive.
Wireless is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 12:13 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Programs: UA
Posts: 1,775
Originally Posted by Wireless
Interesting. Ameco is a joint venture between Air China (60%) and Lufthansa German Airlines (40%).

I wonder if that means Air China might eventually join Star Alliance (I don't remember the current rumors).

While it sucks to see more offshoring, obviously United Services or any other US based provider couldn't be as competitive.
Air China and Lufthansa already have code shares between China and Germany. There are plenty of rumors out about Air China joining Star Alliance and I assume this will eventually happen. At the moment the mainland Chinese carriers still try to figure out which alliance gives them the best deal. China Eastern has some agreements with Cathay. Eventually they will join but hope to get the best deal.
German Expat is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 12:13 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: port broad reach
Programs: NorthSails® | Starboard | ION
Posts: 6,525
Originally Posted by qasr
..The wording of the article seems to indicate that the 777's are going in for D-checks...
That would be correct, as communicated to me by someone within UA.

It makes sense to me. D-checks, after all, are very heavy on labor (vs. say, engine overhaul).

This follows the previous announcement of 747 D-checks going to Korea.
WindFlyer is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 12:20 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 20,404
Originally Posted by qasr
the 777's are going in for D-checks... are they that old already?
Actually, we just missed the 10 year anniversary...June 7, 1995 was the first 777 passenger flight, UA921 LHR-IAD.

Hard to believe it's been 10 years already!

Seems like yesterday UA had the "Ahhh...that new plane smell" billboards around ORD.
UNITED959 is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 12:32 pm
  #7  
dawei
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm a huge fan of China but this one scares me.
 
Old Aug 30, 2005, 12:38 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here today gone tomorrow
Programs: *G, ow Saph
Posts: 2,865
I'm just surprised that heavily-touted United Services, which does heavy maintenance for a number of other airlines, is the loser on this deal. It sort of dimishes their credibility (to those, like me, who don't have any idea about the backstory or any good reasons for this other than outsourcing=money saved).
MKE-MR is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 1:04 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Programs: Bar Alliance Gold
Posts: 16,271
I imagine it depends on each situation. When UA was the first and largest operators of 777s, they probably knew more about it then anyone else, so it seemed logical some domestic and international 777 operators would pick UA for maintenance of their birds.

Now most airlines have years of experience with the 777, meaning that the level of expertise is more widespread, and being able to get an experienced crew in China for half (or less) then an equally experienced crew in the US is now more important. So as UA's maintenance business shrinks (or specializes in other areas - they do a lot of USAF work on transports), UA can move their own maintenance offshore and get the same quality of service at a much lower price.
SEA_Tigger is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 1:10 pm
  #10  
Dub
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Programs: UA 1K, 2MM
Posts: 956
Originally Posted by SEA_Tigger
UA can move their own maintenance offshore and get the same quality of service at a much lower price.
Even if true, this is sad.

The worry, of course, is that it is not the same quality, just cheaper.
Dub is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 2:09 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: port broad reach
Programs: NorthSails® | Starboard | ION
Posts: 6,525
Originally Posted by MKE-MR
I'm just surprised that heavily-touted United Services, which does heavy maintenance for a number of other airlines, is the loser on this deal...
United Services strength is in engine overhaul (which is also very parts-intensive). The service going offshore is airframe heavy maintenance, which is very labor intensive.
WindFlyer is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 2:17 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,331
Anyone know of any other major international carriers have outsourced their heavy maintenance to China? IIRC, NW is doing it, but I can't confirm.

I am not worry about quality of work, but are concerned with the loss of jobs.

Originally Posted by German Expat
Air China and Lufthansa already have code shares between China and Germany. There are plenty of rumors out about Air China joining Star Alliance and I assume this will eventually happen. At the moment the mainland Chinese carriers still try to figure out which alliance gives them the best deal. China Eastern has some agreements with Cathay. Eventually they will join but hope to get the best deal.

Cathay has bought 10% equity in Air China, and the two airlines are working on codeshare flights, joint marketing, linking frequent flyer programs, maintenance and standardize reservation and IT systems. China Eastern (Cathay's out-of-favor playmate) has expressed its anger over Cathay's investment in Air China, and has indicated its desire to link with an international alliance. Air China has said the tie up with Cathay may not affect its choice of international alliance, although Cathy has expressed its desire to bringing Air China into Oneworld...........stay tuned!

Last edited by UA_Flyer; Aug 30, 2005 at 2:22 pm
UA_Flyer is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 2:20 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Programs: Bar Alliance Gold
Posts: 16,271
Originally Posted by Dub
The worry, of course, is that it is not the same quality, just cheaper.
Honestly, quality should not be an issue. The planes need to be repaired/refurbished to FAA specs, whether the person doing it is a PhD being paid $50,000 or a correspondance course student being paid $500.

Trained labor is in high demand in China right now as more and more of the workforce is both highly skilled and highly trained. So it is quite likely that the folks doing the work in China are everybit as skilled and capable as the folks in the US.
SEA_Tigger is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 2:37 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 20,404
Originally Posted by SEA_Tigger
Honestly, quality should not be an issue. The planes need to be repaired/refurbished to FAA specs, whether the person doing it is a PhD being paid $50,000 or a correspondance course student being paid $500.
Very true. The other important factor is the overall engineering of the 777 is more than capable.

I would think that if China got its hands on the 777's blueprints and started to produce imitations at 1/2 the price, then we'd need to worry. But even in that scenario, I'd be willing to bet cost-conscious airlines wouldn't give them the time of day.
UNITED959 is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2005, 2:42 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CHI
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat, SPG Gold, PC Gold
Posts: 174
From what I understand, only the XP configured 777s fly across the pacific. so the XC, XI and domestic version 777s will still get serviced elsewhere or they would fly them to china just for the servicing? I think jetblue flies their ACs empty to venezuela for servicing (not sure if that is for engine overhauls or more major work). There was a WSJ article about that a few months back.

In that same article, they were also talking about bringing replacement part design and manufacturing back in-house due to the high costs of replacement parts from third party vendors (one example was toilet seat). I wouldnt be surprised if this design and manufacturing was also shifted to china if UA decided to bring it inhouse.

Also, does anyone know the frequency of these HMV per aircraft. Does 80 visits over the next 5 years add up with the number of 777s currently in the fleet and the frequency with which these services need to be done?

Also, India is not far behind. A new airport is going up in HYD and a contract was signed to open up a pretty big maintenance center there for a AC servicing vendor like Ameco. This being the first new airport being built in India in a while, the same plans were also discussed for BLR. And with US and european airlines offering increased service to India and the Indian govt I think is now allowing US carriers onward flying permissions, it seems feasible that the all the long haul jets could be cycled through India and China.

Last edited by tanda_raho; Aug 30, 2005 at 2:50 pm
tanda_raho is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.