SAG/AFTRA end first class travel req -- PS F class impact?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC: UA 1K, DL Platinum, AAirpass, Avis PC
Posts: 4,599
SAG/AFTRA end first class travel req -- PS F class impact?
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/new...s-travel-43527
The two largest acting unions gave up the requirement for first class travel when on a 3 class aircraft in their latest contract.
They're even flying coach when 1000 miles or less...
Am guessing this somewhat factors into the decision re: 3 class service on the combined carrier. At least on the PS flights.
We'll see....but looks like better quality business class in recent years prob played a role in the concession being palatable.
Maybe we'll find some actresses on here scoping out elite upgrade tricks now that they're relegated to being in paid coach.
The two largest acting unions gave up the requirement for first class travel when on a 3 class aircraft in their latest contract.
They're even flying coach when 1000 miles or less...
Am guessing this somewhat factors into the decision re: 3 class service on the combined carrier. At least on the PS flights.
We'll see....but looks like better quality business class in recent years prob played a role in the concession being palatable.
Maybe we'll find some actresses on here scoping out elite upgrade tricks now that they're relegated to being in paid coach.
#2
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,686
Maybe we'll see ps go 2 cabin with the current intl C as the F/C product and then E+. Wouldn't be so bad.
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC: UA 1K, DL Platinum, AAirpass, Avis PC
Posts: 4,599
And detail here indicates it goes into effect July 1 if ratified.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR111...Latest+News%29
Just hope we don't end up with 16 seat intl C cabins plying the routes in the name of fleet harmonization...
http://www.variety.com/article/VR111...Latest+News%29
Just hope we don't end up with 16 seat intl C cabins plying the routes in the name of fleet harmonization...
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,558
If they installed IPTE C on the p.s. birds, I think that would be pretty cool! Definitely better than the crappy hand-held video players! One JFK-SFO in September, I went through three devices before one would actually work..
The only downside, would be that the infinite legroom in row 9 would go away
The only downside, would be that the infinite legroom in row 9 would go away
#5
Join Date: Jun 2006
Programs: DL DM, US CP
Posts: 237
The End of P.S.?
The Hollywood Reporter had an article today about how SAG/AFTRA won't require studios to pay for first or business for actors anymore for flights under 1000 miles and will only require business on a 3 class flight longer than 1000 miles. Seeing as these contracts were one of the biggest reasons the 3 class LAX-NYC flights made financial sense for airlines, I wonder--especially in light of the UA/CO merger--if 3 class transcons will soon be a thing of the past.
#6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Platinum
Posts: 1,536
While many in hollywood were filling the F cabins on these flights, also remember there is a lot of connecting traffic from Asia to NYC that take advantage of these flights.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,757
Last time I checked, JFK-LAX is more than 1000 miles.
As long as they need to do it for that purpose, they will keep it. I do think they might expand PS and PS-type operations to EWR and to TATL ops that have a significantly higher ratio of C to Y passengers; ZRH, BSL and GVA come to mind, maybe LHR too.
As long as they need to do it for that purpose, they will keep it. I do think they might expand PS and PS-type operations to EWR and to TATL ops that have a significantly higher ratio of C to Y passengers; ZRH, BSL and GVA come to mind, maybe LHR too.
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC: UA 1K, DL Platinum, AAirpass, Avis PC
Posts: 4,599
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8A293 Safari/6531.22.7)
More than 1000 miles only qualifies for business class travel now in 3 cabin aircraft.
First only allowed on 2 class planes.
Originally Posted by entropy
Last time I checked, JFK-LAX is more than 1000 miles.
As long as they need to do it for that purpose, they will keep it. I do think they might expand PS and PS-type operations to EWR and to TATL ops that have a significantly higher ratio of C to Y passengers; ZRH, BSL and GVA come to mind, maybe LHR too.
As long as they need to do it for that purpose, they will keep it. I do think they might expand PS and PS-type operations to EWR and to TATL ops that have a significantly higher ratio of C to Y passengers; ZRH, BSL and GVA come to mind, maybe LHR too.
First only allowed on 2 class planes.
#9
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MBS/FNT/LAN
Programs: UA 1K, HH Gold, Mariott Gold
Posts: 9,621
To directly answer the question.... It can't help PS.
While I assume it might put a damper on some of the F business LAX-JFK (and vv). As the article notes, several "stars" may be able to still negotiate F travel.
While I assume it might put a damper on some of the F business LAX-JFK (and vv). As the article notes, several "stars" may be able to still negotiate F travel.
#10
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Arlington, VA
Programs: United MP 1p, PC Ambassador, GP Platinum
Posts: 439
#11
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 2P
Posts: 814
If PS works on SFO-JFK as well as LAX-JFK, that would seem to imply that the acting traffic isn't the only thing that makes the flights lucrative.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,757
16C isn't enough really... I could see them going to the CO BF seats up to the exit rows. Depending how they configured it, (? can they do it so that a Read/Forward set of footwells fit between the XR windows? ) they might be able to 32-38 lie flat C
that'd leave 17-18 rows (CO config) in Y (vs 12 for PS), so take out 1 row for E+ and call it 16 rows, that's 24 more Y seats vs the current config.
That's 38/96 =134 total seats +24 from where they are now with lie flat. I think the new management could really use that sort of plane: JFK/EWR/BOS-SFO/LAX, IAD/EWR-GVA/ZRH/BSL/LHR/BRU.
Depends which routes.... Premium traffic that can will book on the nonstops out of EWR rather than connecting thru SFO/LAX when possible. CO serves the biggest of asian routes out of EWR.
that'd leave 17-18 rows (CO config) in Y (vs 12 for PS), so take out 1 row for E+ and call it 16 rows, that's 24 more Y seats vs the current config.
That's 38/96 =134 total seats +24 from where they are now with lie flat. I think the new management could really use that sort of plane: JFK/EWR/BOS-SFO/LAX, IAD/EWR-GVA/ZRH/BSL/LHR/BRU.
Agree. I think the Asia-route-feeder aspects of both LAX and SFO are much more significant.
Last edited by iluv2fly; Nov 10, 2010 at 11:58 am Reason: merge
#14
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,836
So soon, psF will be exclusively employee class and federal air marshalls!
#15
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Arlington, VA
Programs: United MP 1p, PC Ambassador, GP Platinum
Posts: 439