Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airline Programs > United MileagePlus (Consolidated) > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Use your Facebook account to securely log into this site! Click the logo to log in! Connect with Facebook

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 6, 09, 3:27 pm   #1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, Gondinendal erlines non-elite (proudly), SPG Plat, Hyatt & others
Posts: 17,657
The Reason Why CO People Are Getting Singapore F Awards and You Are Not is...

MANUAL SELL

I called CO to redeem some of my "valuable miles ". The agent asked me what cabin I would like. Despite ANA showing no F or C avaialble, I requested F. The agent said "ok, I have to request the flights and you will have to call back later to see if the award seats are confirmed."

(Fast forward to later...)

The F award came back confirmed even though ANA showed it as not available.

So, there you go. This is why CO people have been reporting success in scoring these impossible awards like SQ 1/2 F while we UA folks just watch and drool.

That's it. Next year, all of my UA flights upgraded with SWUs and CR1s will be credited to CO.
__________________
| photo album / flickr | twitter |
BlissWorld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 3:34 pm   #2
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA 1K 1.629 MM
Posts: 8,990
Is SQ 1/2 in F selling for regular F miles?
__________________
12 year FT vet, 2000-2012
zrs70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 3:43 pm   #3
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ORD, HKG
Programs: UA*G (0.57MM), CO Plat, HHonors Gold
Posts: 6,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlissWorld View Post

The F award came back confirmed even though ANA showed it as not available.
If ANA tool showed it is not available, that means it is not available to any *A partners not just UA.

Are you suggesting CO use a different system that we should forget all *A partners and join CO instead if we want to get award seats on SQ ?
ORDnHKG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 3:50 pm   #4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, Gondinendal erlines non-elite (proudly), SPG Plat, Hyatt & others
Posts: 17,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by ORDnHKG View Post
If ANA tool showed it is not available, that means it is not available to any *A partners not just UA.

Are you suggesting CO use a different system that we should forget all *A partners and join CO instead if we want to get award seats on SQ ?
I'm not suggesting. It's a fact.

When an agent requests an award seat from a carrier and the carrier goes back to the requesting airline either confirming the award or denying the award is called a manual sell.

United used to do this but agents are now heavily monitored to never do a manual sell because this increases the cost for United.

Continental is requesting the award from Singapore. The *A published awards on ANA have NOTHING to do with whether Singapore is going to confirm or deny. SQ will most likely confirm because this generates revenue.

My guess is that CO is doing the manual sell temporarily because of the Star Alliance integration. However, it's a perfect time for OnePass members to take advantage of it.

But, since CO is going to be in close partnership with UA, and IF they at one point offer mutual FF benefits, then its a no brainer to accrue all miles on CO, to avoid starnet blocking.
__________________
| photo album / flickr | twitter |
BlissWorld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 4:02 pm   #5
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: CGK SIN PVG ORD
Programs: UA 1K, AA Plat, Hyatt Diamond, Hertz 5*
Posts: 2,562
You mentioned SQ 1/2, so are you saying that SQ is allowing F redemptions on their 77W and A380 flights?
__________________
Born an Indonesian, Raised a Wolverine, now living a mature Flyertalk life
indo79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 4:33 pm   #6
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: UA 1K, BD*G
Posts: 1,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by ORDnHKG View Post
If ANA tool showed it is not available, that means it is not available to any *A partners not just UA.

Are you suggesting CO use a different system that we should forget all *A partners and join CO instead if we want to get award seats on SQ ?
IIRC an agent doing a manual sell, NN request and the like, is bypassing starnet and directly requesting the space. It could well be that the space is there but that SQ is not publishing it to starnet. They do after all make some space available for KF members.

I would imagine the the willingness to so a manual sell is likely due to delays associated with CO integrating their systems to starnet and other *A systems. I would get this while it is hot.
gbsfo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 4:58 pm   #7
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Programs: AA EXP, A3*G, CO Plat
Posts: 981
Actually, you are mixing up different concepts. Every transaction is a 'manual sell,' because by nature the agent always has to request a seat. When an agent requests availability for a segment they see the buckets and number of seats available, then put in an entry to sell from that availability screen by line number. That is called a 'short sell' in industry speak.

Now, if an agent has the flight information, they do what is called a 'LONG SELL' (which is what you are confusing manual sell with) and this involves bypassing the availability screen and directly requesting the segment from the airline in question.

The difference is in the SHORT SELL scenario the system gathers all the availability data ahead of time from the relevant systems and displays it to the user. So, when the user tries to SHORT SELL (the entry looks something like 01O1) the system would immediately reject it as it knows there is no availability.

When an agent LONG SELLS (the entry would something like 0SQ11O2MARLAXNRTNN1) and that request is immediately sent to the airline's system (in this case SQ), and the airline would respond with either a confirm, unconfirm, or waitlist response (there are several variations on each response though).

THAT is the difference here, and THAT is why UA restricts it's agent from performing long sells because it requests from the other carriers system directly.
denCSA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 5:58 pm   #8
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1K, once-upon-a-time NW Gold, BMI Gold, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Gold
Posts: 3,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlissWorld View Post
That's it. Next year, all of my UA flights upgraded with SWUs and CR1s will be credited to CO.
What happens if CO stops doing the manual sell next year? Or SQ stops approving the seats? Then you end up on CO without any SWUs. And without E+ for that matter.

Seems like a lot of risk just to fly SQ.
hobo13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 6:42 pm   #9
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, California
Posts: 2,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by denCSA View Post
Actually, you are mixing up different concepts. Every transaction is a 'manual sell,' because by nature the agent always has to request a seat. When an agent requests availability for a segment they see the buckets and number of seats available, then put in an entry to sell from that availability screen by line number. That is called a 'short sell' in industry speak.

Now, if an agent has the flight information, they do what is called a 'LONG SELL' (which is what you are confusing manual sell with) and this involves bypassing the availability screen and directly requesting the segment from the airline in question.

The difference is in the SHORT SELL scenario the system gathers all the availability data ahead of time from the relevant systems and displays it to the user. So, when the user tries to SHORT SELL (the entry looks something like 01O1) the system would immediately reject it as it knows there is no availability.

When an agent LONG SELLS (the entry would something like 0SQ11O2MARLAXNRTNN1) and that request is immediately sent to the airline's system (in this case SQ), and the airline would respond with either a confirm, unconfirm, or waitlist response (there are several variations on each response though).

THAT is the difference here, and THAT is why UA restricts it's agent from performing long sells because it requests from the other carriers system directly.
Nice info, thank you.
DBCme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 7:17 pm   #10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DCA
Programs: AMC MovieWatcher, Giant BonusCard, Petco PALS Card, Silver Diner Blue Plate Club
Posts: 22,216
Did you score SQ1/2, and not SQ11/12? Because SQ11/12 are still available as regular mileage F awards to SQ's own members, while SQ1/2 are not...
__________________
View from the Wing blog: everything you need to know about earning/redeeming miles & getting the most bang for your travel $$
gleff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 7:35 pm   #11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA 1K 1MM; DL Plat; SPG Gold; Hilton Silver; Marriott Silver; Hertz 5-Star; Avis Pres Club
Posts: 26,860
Posting something like this is a sure-fire way to get it shut down sooner rather than later.
channa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 11:05 pm   #12
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ORD, HKG
Programs: UA*G (0.57MM), CO Plat, HHonors Gold
Posts: 6,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by gleff View Post
Did you score SQ1/2, and not SQ11/12? Because SQ11/12 are still available as regular mileage F awards to SQ's own members, while SQ1/2 are not...
I am still puzzling about why on earth even SQ's own members cannot redemm on SQ 1/2 instead CO member can.
ORDnHKG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 11:18 pm   #13
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: VGT
Programs: UA Metal-of-the-month, SBUX Gold, Couch Platinum
Posts: 1,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlissWorld View Post
That's it. Next year, all of my UA flights upgraded with SWUs and CR1s will be credited to CO.
So, you're counting on taking advantage of CO in 2011 and beyond based on your experience today!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlissWorld View Post
My guess is that CO is doing the manual sell temporarily because of the Star Alliance integration.
But you acknowledge today's experience is a temporary anomaly!

Have fun on the other side. See you back in 2012.
__________________
“A good traveler has no fixed plans and is not intent on arriving.” -- Lao Tzu
AquaDyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 11:19 pm   #14
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: All over
Programs: Most
Posts: 8,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by denCSA View Post
Actually, you are mixing up different concepts. Every transaction is a 'manual sell,' because by nature the agent always has to request a seat. When an agent requests availability for a segment they see the buckets and number of seats available, then put in an entry to sell from that availability screen by line number. That is called a 'short sell' in industry speak.
Yep. OP is somewhat confused with these different concepts.

I doubt that CO would have access to SQ award inventory that would not be available to other *A partners. Also there might be POS issues that doesn't always always show the exact inventory using ANA tool.
holtju2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 11:23 pm   #15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: FRA - PHL - LAX
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP, HH Gold, Hyatt Diamond, Starwood Gold, BD/BA Gold, Kingfisher Silver
Posts: 15,882
UA agents can manual sell to. But don't count on it sticking...

http://upgrd.com/matthew/update-circ...l-failure.html
(with a tip of the hat and a humble apology to holtju2 for doubting his wisdom)

I agree with others: CO is most likely going to patch up this hole, so I'm still crediting my miles to UA.
__________________
Check out my travel blog at upgrd.com
MatthewLAX is online now   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:19 pm.

Contact Us - FlyerTalk - Archive - Top



SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.