If you ever wanted Jeff Smisek's email address...
Apr 20, 2011, 5:43 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: United Platinum
Posts: 207
If you ever wanted Jeff Smisek's email address...
[email protected]
http://money.cnn.com/video/news/2011...mails.fortune/
why is it that the CEO can answer emails faster than customer service?
http://money.cnn.com/video/news/2011...mails.fortune/
why is it that the CEO can answer emails faster than customer service?
Apr 20, 2011, 6:11 pm
#2
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,768
Some of the other video's are also interesting
Making a successful airline merger
Spending $25,000 a minute on jet fuel
United's innovation: Fees
well he forwards 99+% to Customer Care
Making a successful airline merger
Spending $25,000 a minute on jet fuel
United's innovation: Fees
well he forwards 99+% to Customer Care
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Apr 20, 2011 at 6:17 pm Reason: fixed formatting
Apr 21, 2011, 2:16 pm
#3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: UA 1k
Posts: 226
I just came over here to tell you all about the video, but you found it! pretty cool.
He actually has a decent sense of humor.
He actually has a decent sense of humor.
Apr 21, 2011, 2:27 pm
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: LAX/SFO/ASE
Posts: 176
thanks
I just sent an email regarding the new 120 qualification level - hope he responds
Apr 21, 2011, 4:17 pm
#5
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LAX
Programs: UA Silver, AA, WN, DL
Posts: 4,091
In the video, he stated that he will personally respond to customer emails if he finds it particularly compelling; majority of them are just customer gripes/issues (i.e. devaluation, poor service, etc.) go to the CS people.
I suspect if one writes a concise and articulated email that had valid issues or points that is beyond your normal CS canned reply, it may garner a response.
I have read some very well thought out and interesting points of views from our fellow FT'ers, and I think those kinds of posts would get a response.
I suspect if one writes a concise and articulated email that had valid issues or points that is beyond your normal CS canned reply, it may garner a response.
I have read some very well thought out and interesting points of views from our fellow FT'ers, and I think those kinds of posts would get a response.
Apr 21, 2011, 8:08 pm
#6
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: DEN (ex-MCI)
Programs: UA Platinum
Posts: 284
Apr 21, 2011, 8:36 pm
#7
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia, LAX, Paris
Programs: UA 1K/2MM, SPG/Marriott Lifetime Titanium, Lifetime HHonors Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, AA Exec Plat
Posts: 3,326
Very fascinating interviews, and I am very impressed with Jeff.
Thank you WineCountryUA for sharing the links.
While the jury is still out and I am not ready to applaud his work yet, I am willing to give Jeff the benefits of the doubt. I am not sure why so many people on FT dislike him, but to each its own
So far, however, I have been pleasantly surprised and somewhat impressed, and the fact that my 75% of my flying in 2011 has been on UACO speaks for itself (the rest has been on Useless Air to get my mileage & EQM because it does not make any sense to fly anyone else for some of the destinations).
Thank you WineCountryUA for sharing the links.
While the jury is still out and I am not ready to applaud his work yet, I am willing to give Jeff the benefits of the doubt. I am not sure why so many people on FT dislike him, but to each its own
So far, however, I have been pleasantly surprised and somewhat impressed, and the fact that my 75% of my flying in 2011 has been on UACO speaks for itself (the rest has been on Useless Air to get my mileage & EQM because it does not make any sense to fly anyone else for some of the destinations).
Apr 21, 2011, 8:53 pm
#8
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Midwest (ORD)
Programs: UA 1P, HHonors Gold, Hertz Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 28
Good Vid. I liked his candor and honesty. He's nuts for giving out his email to 150m people but that's his problem now. 
Apr 21, 2011, 9:16 pm
#9
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: AA Plat
Posts: 141
I found it fascinating he referred to employees as co-workers, instead of placing himself above them as most CEO's do.
Apr 21, 2011, 10:07 pm
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 20,404
Fascinating? Maybe. It does sound like he's a down to earth guy, but it ends there. Make no mistake, Jeff may give off this progressive CEO aura, but he does what he wants at the end of the day. Don't be fooled. Maybe a 1990 livery rings a bell.
Apr 22, 2011, 4:31 am
#11
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: HKG, BOS
Programs: CX SL, AB Gold, AF/KL FB Silver, HU/HX Silver, SPG Gold
Posts: 2,596
Previously, I wrote to his co.com email and I was really shocked when he replied personally on two different occasions. I had expected for a reply from "Executive Customer Relations" or something.
Apr 22, 2011, 6:39 am
#12
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: buffalo, ny, usa
Programs: DL DM
Posts: 120
wow, if they showed a clip of that on boarding instead of the changes you'll like crap, maybe everyone wouldn't think he a smug
Last edited by iluv2fly; Apr 22, 2011 at 7:43 am Reason: language
Apr 22, 2011, 8:15 am
#13
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC: UA 1K, DL Platinum, AAirpass, Avis PC
Posts: 4,599
He does read and respond -- but I never write about personal issues -- only brief suggestions to broad issues or opportunities. Though in my work exchanges with CEOs are common so have practice keeping it clean and direct.
He's been forthcoming in giving a heads up that a particular suggestion is in the works.
I only do it on occasion, and his predecessor Kellner was also good about it.
Really hope people don't abuse the privilege and think carefully before writing the question "is this something that could improve things for a large number of flyers?"
He's been forthcoming in giving a heads up that a particular suggestion is in the works.
I only do it on occasion, and his predecessor Kellner was also good about it.
Really hope people don't abuse the privilege and think carefully before writing the question "is this something that could improve things for a large number of flyers?"
Apr 22, 2011, 9:25 am
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
Very fascinating interviews, and I am very impressed with Jeff.
Thank you WineCountryUA for sharing the links.
While the jury is still out and I am not ready to applaud his work yet, I am willing to give Jeff the benefits of the doubt. I am not sure why so many people on FT dislike him, but to each its own
So far, however, I have been pleasantly surprised and somewhat impressed, and the fact that my 75% of my flying in 2011 has been on UACO speaks for itself (the rest has been on Useless Air to get my mileage & EQM because it does not make any sense to fly anyone else for some of the destinations).
Thank you WineCountryUA for sharing the links.
While the jury is still out and I am not ready to applaud his work yet, I am willing to give Jeff the benefits of the doubt. I am not sure why so many people on FT dislike him, but to each its own
So far, however, I have been pleasantly surprised and somewhat impressed, and the fact that my 75% of my flying in 2011 has been on UACO speaks for itself (the rest has been on Useless Air to get my mileage & EQM because it does not make any sense to fly anyone else for some of the destinations).
Apr 22, 2011, 9:38 am
#15
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Uncle Jeff (or one of his minions) does read his e-mail as I sent two to his UA e-mail address praising two UA employees and within 24 hours later I rec'd a response thanking me and telling me that the employees* would be contacted about my letter.
*both individual employees were named in his e-mail so somebody did read it
*both individual employees were named in his e-mail so somebody did read it
