Basic Economy Airport and Plane Experiences (First or Second Hand)
#91
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hiding under the trees in Denver, CO
Programs: UA 1K 2.5MM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium Elite, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 4,306
Maybe one of the positive results of BE is that there will be fewer delays due to the last-minute checking of carry-ons. The agents can make announcements, then spot potential problems when BE customers line up in Group 5.
#92
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: ORD
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Platinum/LT Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 5,594
I do realize its easier to just fill any empty E+ with BE fares that don't have seats, but its going to create expectations and give a potential incentive for folks to be ok with buying BE. Many people have this happen to them once, and they'll be back with the GA next flight asking for this favor.
I agree with you that UA should stick to the rules, for the experiential reasons. But I don't think UA cares if people buy BE or not. At worst, it's probably revenue-neutral, at least in whole if not by each BE fare sold.
My concern is that a plane made up of 90% regular fare passengers is going to be delayed as they work through individual issues, or as you noted, people thinking they have a right to E+ in the future. Hopefully they have some type of process and algorithm in mind as BE becomes more prevalent.
#93
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Denver
Posts: 451
Just had an interesting second hand account on a flight to ORD. Passenger on BE fare has carry on that GA has him put in the sizer to make sure it's small enough to fit under his seat. Turns out it's a little bit too big, so GA informs him she's going to have to charge him to gate check it. In response the guy starts taking out clothes from the bag and puts them on. In the end he was wearing several shirts and a couple pairs of shorts, bag fit the sizer, and he got on the plane looking like the Michelin Man. All's well that ends well, I suppose.
#94
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Just had an interesting second hand account on a flight to ORD. Passenger on BE fare has carry on that GA has him put in the sizer to make sure it's small enough to fit under his seat. Turns out it's a little bit too big, so GA informs him she's going to have to charge him to gate check it. In response the guy starts taking out clothes from the bag and puts them on. In the end he was wearing several shirts and a couple pairs of shorts, bag fit the sizer, and he got on the plane looking like the Michelin Man. All's well that ends well, I suppose.
#95
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: AA
Posts: 14,727
Just had an interesting second hand account on a flight to ORD. Passenger on BE fare has carry on that GA has him put in the sizer to make sure it's small enough to fit under his seat. Turns out it's a little bit too big, so GA informs him she's going to have to charge him to gate check it. In response the guy starts taking out clothes from the bag and puts them on. In the end he was wearing several shirts and a couple pairs of shorts, bag fit the sizer, and he got on the plane looking like the Michelin Man. All's well that ends well, I suppose.
#96
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Oakland CA
Programs: DL Gold, AS MVPG, Globalist
Posts: 1,008
If you are always going to buy F, then that works as a plan.... But in my case, I will pay for F/J (or on OALs PE) if the price is reasonable and the trip is 3+ hours. But on common routes I fly (SFO-SEA, SFO-LAX) I don't see a need to pay for F. So the Options are (a) fly Delta/VX/AS and get a Y fare, that they upgrade to E+ or F for $x, or (b) fly United and get offered BE for $x and have to pay another $30 for E+ and to get status credit(i.e. to use my benefits). Putting aside that United is never going to upgrade me to F, that effort to charge me more, costs United a shot at all of my business, and I pay about $60-70K/year in airfares.
Shortsighted, esp. in competitive markets, unless everybody does it. I'm thinking AS won't, and neither will SWA.
Already doing a lot more AS flying this year, so for me the ship has sailed, but we'll see how many others they lose.
#97
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philly, PA
Programs: Avis First, Hertz Gold, Marriott Platinum, US Airways Platinum, AA Platinum, UA Silver, Hilton Diamo
Posts: 206
Flown on United most my life, but not frequent enough to ever maintain any real status with them. First time flying United with my wife and children in tow (3 children under the age of 3). 2 of 3 children were ticketed (one lap child).
Flying from EWR to MCO, we arrived at the gate with a double stroller and car seat. When attempting to gate check the car seat and stroller the gate agent offered to clear our row so we could have it to ourselves and use the car seat. We had 4 tickets and it was a 737 so this meant moving the others next to us elsewhere on the plane.
The customer were moved up to Economy Plus and we were given the whole row to ourselves. We never asked for anything so we were taken aback and very happy with the gate agent. Really made us feel good about United, which is commensurate with my previous experiences with the airline.
On the way back from MCO to EWR I asked the gate agent about it to see if the same scenario could be extended to us again and she looked at me like I had 3 heads
So thank you EWR United Gate Agent!
Flying from EWR to MCO, we arrived at the gate with a double stroller and car seat. When attempting to gate check the car seat and stroller the gate agent offered to clear our row so we could have it to ourselves and use the car seat. We had 4 tickets and it was a 737 so this meant moving the others next to us elsewhere on the plane.
The customer were moved up to Economy Plus and we were given the whole row to ourselves. We never asked for anything so we were taken aback and very happy with the gate agent. Really made us feel good about United, which is commensurate with my previous experiences with the airline.
On the way back from MCO to EWR I asked the gate agent about it to see if the same scenario could be extended to us again and she looked at me like I had 3 heads
So thank you EWR United Gate Agent!
#98
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: ORD
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Platinum/LT Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 5,594
Just had an interesting second hand account on a flight to ORD. Passenger on BE fare has carry on that GA has him put in the sizer to make sure it's small enough to fit under his seat. Turns out it's a little bit too big, so GA informs him she's going to have to charge him to gate check it. In response the guy starts taking out clothes from the bag and puts them on. In the end he was wearing several shirts and a couple pairs of shorts, bag fit the sizer, and he got on the plane looking like the Michelin Man. All's well that ends well, I suppose.
#99
Join Date: May 2012
Location: ORF, RIC
Programs: UA LT 1K, 3 MM; Marriott Titanium; IHG Platinum
Posts: 6,944
First of all, that's awesome. Second, I'm glad I wasn't sitting next to him. I wonder if he took a couple layers off and stuffed them under the seat once he was seated? Kind of like the silliness of having someone stuff a purse into another bag to get down to 2 when you know they're going to take it out 5 minutes later anyway (but I get it, it's the rule).
#100
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,882
Bolding mine.
I agree with you that UA should stick to the rules, for the experiential reasons. But I don't think UA cares if people buy BE or not. At worst, it's probably revenue-neutral, at least in whole if not by each BE fare sold.
My concern is that a plane made up of 90% regular fare passengers is going to be delayed as they work through individual issues, or as you noted, people thinking they have a right to E+ in the future. Hopefully they have some type of process and algorithm in mind as BE becomes more prevalent.
I agree with you that UA should stick to the rules, for the experiential reasons. But I don't think UA cares if people buy BE or not. At worst, it's probably revenue-neutral, at least in whole if not by each BE fare sold.
My concern is that a plane made up of 90% regular fare passengers is going to be delayed as they work through individual issues, or as you noted, people thinking they have a right to E+ in the future. Hopefully they have some type of process and algorithm in mind as BE becomes more prevalent.
For Regular fare passengers: Create an algorithim for a comp. E+ selection if needed based on BE load and number of available seats in E- - offer could be based on *G status or if one is in a high enough fare class (maybe Y, B, M, E, U...or maybe even program flexibility based on number of BE passengers and number of available seats for them), offer them the normal E+ buy up. If they decline, give them a message, something like "due to overbooking in the regular economy cabin, you have been selected to receive a seat in economy + for no additional charge" - they can either select from available seats in E+, or decline and keep in their existing seat. Maybe skip the buy up, maybe not. Repeat as necessary for other customers that meet the offer requirements.
For BE passengers: If there are enough seats at the time of check in for their entire party - they get BPs with the seats...if not, they get a "see agent at gate for seat assignment" or whatever it says today, and then agent handles at gate.
I realize its not going to work 100% of the time, but could work to not overload the GA with seat requests while handling the matter. The programming shouldn't be that hard, but would of course, require software to 'guesstimate" - but these days, can be done fairly accurately.
#101
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Programs: UA Gold (.85 MM), HH Diamond, SPG Platinum (LT Gold), Hertz PC, National EE
Posts: 5,648
I had the pleasure of seeing this in person today in PHX. GA made multiple announcements that group 5 would not be allowed anything but one personal item. Boarding looked orderly from start to finish on a completely full airplane. I got to watch, as I was on standby and was the very last person to board. To my surprise, there was plenty of bin space. If this is the side benefit of BE fares, I guess I will take it as a positive.
#102
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Programs: UA Plat-2MM, Marriott Life Titanium, Hyatt something
Posts: 1,888
I had the pleasure of seeing this in person today in PHX. GA made multiple announcements that group 5 would not be allowed anything but one personal item. Boarding looked orderly from start to finish on a completely full airplane. I got to watch, as I was on standby and was the very last person to board. To my surprise, there was plenty of bin space. If this is the side benefit of BE fares, I guess I will take it as a positive.
#103
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Programs: UA Gold (.85 MM), HH Diamond, SPG Platinum (LT Gold), Hertz PC, National EE
Posts: 5,648
#104
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atherton, CA
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP; Owner, Green Bay Packers
Posts: 21,690
I flew yesterday out of SFO.
My scheduler got suckered by the new "Basic Economy" on UA and booked that, unfortunately last minute, so I got screwed on EQDs and EQSs. I'd mentioned it to her a few months ago, but she ended up forgetting to schedule my flight until 2 days prior, and I didn't catch it within the 24 hour window.
UA is really going out of their way to make basic economy pax feel like merde. Plastered all over the tickets, signs at the gate, the absolute worst seat on the plane, threatening to charge for even carry on bags. Luckily just talked to a GA and fixed these.
There's no charge for a carryon rollaboard for Premier status, but a $50 charge if you bring it to the gate otherwise. $25 for a checked rollaboard.
I was initially assigned, literally, the worst seat on the plane, last row stuck in the window seat (2X2 seating).
Boarding group was assigned appropriately per my status, so not stuck at the end of boarding.
It looks like UA is going out of their way to make BE pax feel like 3rd or 4th class citizens.
Terrible look for the airline.
My scheduler got suckered by the new "Basic Economy" on UA and booked that, unfortunately last minute, so I got screwed on EQDs and EQSs. I'd mentioned it to her a few months ago, but she ended up forgetting to schedule my flight until 2 days prior, and I didn't catch it within the 24 hour window.
UA is really going out of their way to make basic economy pax feel like merde. Plastered all over the tickets, signs at the gate, the absolute worst seat on the plane, threatening to charge for even carry on bags. Luckily just talked to a GA and fixed these.
There's no charge for a carryon rollaboard for Premier status, but a $50 charge if you bring it to the gate otherwise. $25 for a checked rollaboard.
I was initially assigned, literally, the worst seat on the plane, last row stuck in the window seat (2X2 seating).
Boarding group was assigned appropriately per my status, so not stuck at the end of boarding.
It looks like UA is going out of their way to make BE pax feel like 3rd or 4th class citizens.
Terrible look for the airline.
#105
Join Date: Nov 2012
Programs: BA Bronze, United 1K, HH Gold, SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 3,477
Lucky for me, my wife is the one that does my airline and hotel reservations. And then my place of employment reimburses me. At the beginning of my career, I had my administrative assistant doing the reservations and always ended up in middle seats at the back of the plane and in hotels not convenient for my destination.