Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Lost business fall-out from Flight UA3411

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Lost business fall-out from Flight UA3411

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:08 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Houston/DC
Programs: UA 1K, 1MM
Posts: 564
Originally Posted by s0ssos
And the LEO that dragged and bloodied the passenger? Are you saying he is a monster? He couldn't also be a single dad raising 2 kids?

If you're not saying anybody is at fault, then maybe it is the corporation that is evil?
From my experience it is not the corporation or the people that work for it, far from it. I recognize this incident for what it is, a situation that got out of control and went sideways. Partly due to flawed procedures and/or regulations. It seems that the constructive part of this incident is UA is going to change their procedures and there may be some positive rules/legislation from government that benefit travelers (could be bad regs also).

It seems many who comment on these posts regarding this incident just want to see UA burn to the ground. What is constructive about that? If it truly happened and they went under (I doubt it), what would be good about that. One less major carrier in the marketplace, increased fares due to less competition, less chance of a CPU in your airline of choice as elites have to find a place on other airlines, etc..
FlyngSvyr is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:10 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
If there's one thing good that will come from this, it might well be an end to the police used as airline bouncers.
Why is that a good thing? If I run a business and I don't want a customer on my property anymore and they refuse to leave, I expect the police to show up and be my bouncers. That's what I pay my taxes for.

If the customer doesn't like it, they can sue me for whatever reason they think I was out of line in having them removed, but one thing they absolutely DO NOT get to do is camp out on my property if I don't want them there.

Originally Posted by MojaveFlyer
What an unlikely hero, but I gotta agree with you.
He's not a hero. He's an ........ He got hurt because he was committing a felony.

(Note: I do not think it was appropriate for him to be dragged off the plane after he hit his head - at that point force should have stopped and medical attention should have been provided.)

Originally Posted by TheVJOng
Most domestic flights these days are already full, especially for popular routes. If a lot of people boycott United, then won't that cause more overbooking on the other airlines? It's not like there are that many other choices for people to go to.
What will happen is other airline's low fare classes might book up a bit faster, and then people who fly based on price will buy the slightly cheaper United tickets.
raehl311 is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:12 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 401
Originally Posted by raehl311

(Note: I do not think it was appropriate for him to be dragged off the plane after he hit his head - at that point force should have stopped and medical attention should have been provided.)
I'm guessing that was the reason only one officer was suspended without pay (the plainclothes that dragged him after he was on the ground). That might be Dao's only real target in the coming weeks.

Just looking at this vid starting at the 5 second mark doesn't show anything out of the ordinary with removing someone from your property that is no longer welcome there.
MDJennings is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:13 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Houston/DC
Programs: UA 1K, 1MM
Posts: 564
Originally Posted by TheVJOng
Most domestic flights these days are already full, especially for popular routes. If a lot of people boycott United, then won't that cause more overbooking on the other airlines? It's not like there are that many other choices for people to go to.
Exactly, it's not like the other airlines are going to magically create more routes/planes/crews to move that many more people...
FlyngSvyr is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:16 pm
  #35  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17,451
Originally Posted by FlyngSvyr
From my experience it is not the corporation or the people that work for it, far from it. I recognize this incident for what it is, a situation that got out of control and went sideways. Partly due to flawed procedures and/or regulations. It seems that the constructive part of this incident is UA is going to change their procedures and there may be some positive rules/legislation from government that benefit travelers (could be bad regs also).

It seems many who comment on these posts regarding this incident just want to see UA burn to the ground. What is constructive about that? If it truly happened and they went under (I doubt it), what would be good about that. One less major carrier in the marketplace, increased fares due to less competition, less chance of a CPU in your airline of choice as elites have to find a place on other airlines, etc..
This company - as do many publicly traded companies - takes their fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders more seriously than it's commitment to customer service. But they're selling a service to create profitability. The contradiction causes mistaken priorities top to bottom as this case illustrates.
rickg523 is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:17 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Boston MA
Programs: UA 1K/1.5 million miler, SU Gold, JL Sapphire
Posts: 529
I have control of my travel budget.

Usually, always give United the chance to compete for my business. If there are within the same waters of others, I go with them. So, sure, if they try to get $2K more money, won't give them, but $200 on J transcon? Sure.

Now? I will give them the cold shoulder for a few months. This is not going to be permanent because I know others are probably as worse, but they need to get the message. The culture needs fixing in favor of clients. Munoz said he will make sure nothing like this will happen? Well, Oscar, I (and others, I am sure) will be watching.

If it turns out to be the point in time when passengers pushed back on the airlines, it may turn out to be a bright day after all. I am not holding my breath, but one can hope.
skidooman is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:18 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ATL
Programs: DL DM, Hyatt LT DM, Wyndham DM, Hertz PC, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,038
Originally Posted by DenverBrian
Knee jerk...or straw that broke the camel's back? @:-)
Exactly.

I don't understand how people will defend and continue to utilize an airline with the worst(or close to it) ratings year in and out. There are 2 other good options in the US(or more if you consider low cost). It just makes no sense.

I have a few die hard UA flyers in my industry(very small) and routinely deal with mechanical delays, canceled flights and more. DL isn't perfect but the two huge meltdowns(Aug 16 and Apr 17) pale in comparison with a single year of flying UA internationally from what they tell me(or I see on their twitter/facebook.
dinanm3atl is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:19 pm
  #38  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Platinum, DL Platinum, UA Gold, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 605
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
What an idiotic company to forfeit previously booked non-refundable tickets over a very complex issue that is still a developing story.

And here I don't mean United, though they often fall into that category.

If there's one thing good that will come from this, it might well be an end to the police used as airline bouncers.
It's a $180 ticket, I'm sure most of us here have had to eat a cheap ticket that fell below the $200 change fee threshold.

Companies start and stop using different vendors for different reasons all the time, nothing idiotic about that.
LA2CDG is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:22 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: LAX
Programs: UAL 1K MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 438
17+ years , 3100+ flights and I wish I could feel sorry for united
Kharma is real, united just does not care
Lani1 is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:26 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Programs: ba silver
Posts: 729
I think UA will take a hit because of this. It won't bankrupt them but a couple of things to keep in mind: nobody will suddenly decide to give their business to UA in support of what happened. While most of us are rational this has left a long term scar on UA, particularly in China. UA will have to offer lower fares to not lose market share, less so in American. They may need to start advertising in convince people that this is not how things will be. Right now, the perception is bad; there arste people ( wrongfully) fear stepping on a UA flight right now; picture a parent with a child who has issues and might overreact during a delay, or a senior who's spouse might also have certain issues due to their age, and so on. It's a knee jerk reaction but they might be afraid that their loved ones might be the passenger to get a beating. Not right, but that's the perception. United, and the industry in general has a huge image problem that will not be easy to fix.
stevendorechester is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:26 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Nashua, NH USA
Programs: Seashore Trolley Museum "flight attendant"
Posts: 1,991
Telling your employees to stop using a particular airline (United) and forfeit tickets already bought has a totally counterproductive outcome. The airline gets to make more money selling the seats to other passengers while pocketing the revenue from the forfeited tickets.
AllanJ is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:33 pm
  #42  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
Originally Posted by MDJennings
I'm guessing that was the reason only one officer was suspended without pay (the plainclothes that dragged him after he was on the ground).
The first officer was not suspended without pay. He was placed on paid administrative leave while an investigation is underway, something that is very common in serious police investigations while the facts are investigated. Both the Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun Times have reported he is on "leave" (not "suspended") and ABC reported this morning that the leave is paid administrative leave. He may very well end up suspended or fired after the investigation is completed, but we're not there yet.
tom911 is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:37 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
And the other two officers were also placed on leave today.
raehl311 is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:44 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 80
Originally Posted by FlyngSvyr
It seems many who comment on these posts regarding this incident just want to see UA burn to the ground. What is constructive about that? If it truly happened and they went under (I doubt it), what would be good about that. One less major carrier in the marketplace, increased fares due to less competition, less chance of a CPU in your airline of choice as elites have to find a place on other airlines, etc..
I also don't think UA burns to the ground, but hey, lest you forget, burning to the ground is how capitalism works. Survival of the fittest, next deserving one up, etc., etc. Nothing inherently wrong with it.
erlich is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2017, 8:52 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 401
Originally Posted by tom911
The first officer was not suspended without pay. He was placed on paid administrative leave while an investigation is underway, something that is very common in serious police investigations while the facts are investigated. Both the Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun Times have reported he is on "leave" (not "suspended") and ABC reported this morning that the leave is paid administrative leave. He may very well end up suspended or fired after the investigation is completed, but we're not there yet.
I stand corrected. ^
MDJennings is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.