UA&AC-booking - how long for AC ticket confirmation?
#16
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,852
Absolutely this happens. I explained it in my post above. I've had this happen several times in the past. Once when booking TK (and that whole ticket cancelled before 24 hours because TK denied UA's request for inventory). Twice last year where tickets included LH, AC and CA flights. I waited 24 hours on both of them, called back and got the tickets issued and my card charged.....
So this happens to you for every partner booking or every booking including TG, LH, AC, CA, ...???
If only happens sometimes, how does the agent know which times to deffer payment?
... If I had to guess, UA does this because if they issue the ticket and then the partner cancels the inventory request within 24 hours (which the partner has the right to do), UA is then on the hook to get the passenger to their destination without any upcharge in fare. This way if the partner cancels within 24 hours UA cancels the whole itinerary and is not responsible for transporting the passenger, nor for refunding any fare. ...
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Floating around
Programs: UA 1K (1MM), DL Gold (1MM), Marriott LTT
Posts: 10,344
Well, I ticket 90%+ online and I have never had this happen with an online booking.
So this happens to you for every partner booking or every booking including TG, LH, AC, CA, ...???
If only happens sometimes, how does the agent know which times to deffer payment?
Would equally apply for online bookings if this was the reason and would not it happen for all bookings with those partners?
So this happens to you for every partner booking or every booking including TG, LH, AC, CA, ...???
If only happens sometimes, how does the agent know which times to deffer payment?
Would equally apply for online bookings if this was the reason and would not it happen for all bookings with those partners?
However, CA and TK by far have the most issues. I've done AC tickets and had them issued immediately but also had to call back in (granted, other airlines were in that reservation as well).
Maybe it's a case of some agents being more cautious than others. I'm not sure about that. But there is precedent for this happening, and frequently.
BTW, it also happens for SQ and TG. I've purchased UA tickets online with SQ and TG and get the warning that UA will request the inventory from the partner and that the credit card will not be charged until a ticket is issued. Sometimes the ticket is issued within 3 hours, other times it takes 24 hours. I don't bother calling unless I book a ticket for the next day (in the case of SQ earlier this year).
-RM
#19
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SJC
Programs: Southwest, Alaska, United, American Airlines
Posts: 994
Well, I ticket 90%+ online and I have never had this happen with an online booking.
So this happens to you for every partner booking or every booking including TG, LH, AC, CA, ...???
If only happens sometimes, how does the agent know which times to deffer payment?
Would equally apply for online bookings if this was the reason and would not it happen for all bookings with those partners?
So this happens to you for every partner booking or every booking including TG, LH, AC, CA, ...???
If only happens sometimes, how does the agent know which times to deffer payment?
Would equally apply for online bookings if this was the reason and would not it happen for all bookings with those partners?
There's no requirement for United to wait 24 hours -- the airline can ticket anytime after HK status is received from the other airline, and frequently does so. If ticketing with a phone agent, they can contact the OAL's res office directly, or even visit the carrier's website, to confirm right away the space is holding (I've had UA agents do both). A response to a OAL seat assignment sent by UA also provides sufficient verification of HK status as well (in fact, UA's system uses this very approach for certain carriers to confirm space ahead of T+24 ).
To be sure, other airlines DO have a minimum of 24 hours to accept or refuse any bookings made by United on their flights, and UA policy is a derivative of this industry practice with the intention of minimizing booking complications for the passenger.
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,884
BTW, it also happens for SQ and TG. I've purchased UA tickets online with SQ and TG and get the warning that UA will request the inventory from the partner and that the credit card will not be charged until a ticket is issued. Sometimes the ticket is issued within 3 hours, other times it takes 24 hours. I don't bother calling unless I book a ticket for the next day (in the case of SQ earlier this year).
-RM
-RM
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Floating around
Programs: UA 1K (1MM), DL Gold (1MM), Marriott LTT
Posts: 10,344
i believe for any ticket, the charge is only done once it tickets. However, they do always run a pending charge (which is different). Also, since UA flights typically ticket witthin a few minutes, no one knows the difference if the card is charged at booking or ticketing.
Interest note...I just booked an all CA-operated/coded itinerary on UA.com. It ticketed immediately and there was no warning online about needing 24 hours to confirm availability. So maybe UA has changed their handling of CA flights and no longer requires 24 hours. Not sure.
Also, someone above posted TK allows instant ticketing. That was not the case two years ago but things could have definitely changed. I had a wholly TK-operated/coded ticket get cancelled less than 8 hours after booking. UA said TK rejected the sale.
-RM
#22
Join Date: Oct 2002
Programs: United Premier 1K
Posts: 1,230
United has seamless availability that enables instant ticketing with the following partners: LH, SN, LX, NH, CM, AV, CA, TK. For these carriers, UA can simply book what it sees availability, and process ticketing/exchanges right away. For all other Star Alliance partners (incl. OS and AC), United's policy is to book the space, then hold it for some time pending confirmation by the other airline.
Do we know why this connection isn't as seamless as with other airlines? Is it due to the systems they are on?
#23
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SJC
Programs: Southwest, Alaska, United, American Airlines
Posts: 994
Slightly off-topic, but during IRROPS it is extremely frustrating that UA does not have this "seamless" link. Often flying out of Toronto on UA if there is a delay, the best/only alternative is on AC metal. While the UA agent can see the space, they have to *call* AC to confirm it before they can book me. AC's phone lines are notoriously clogged (even for UA agents apparently), and I'm usually on hold with UA (who is on hold with AC) for a long time trying to make the change, while the clock is ticking down to make the new flight.
Do we know why this connection isn't as seamless as with other airlines? Is it due to the systems they are on?
Do we know why this connection isn't as seamless as with other airlines? Is it due to the systems they are on?
To properly handle an Involuntary Reroute governed by IATA rules (e.g., a reroute from UA to AC), the IRROPS impacted airline must obtain a confirmation of space from the Receiving Carrier (i.e., the new airline) prior to re-ticketing/FIM'ing the customer. This is because 1) inventory displays of Other Airline space are often inaccurate within some time before departure, and/or 2) the Receiving Carrier may be experiencing its own irregular operations (e.g., potential oversale). The confirmation of space may be done electronically (e.g., via Telex), or more commonly, by simply calling the Receiving Carrier to confirm seats are available.
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,884
Slightly off-topic, but during IRROPS it is extremely frustrating that UA does not have this "seamless" link. Often flying out of Toronto on UA if there is a delay, the best/only alternative is on AC metal. While the UA agent can see the space, they have to *call* AC to confirm it before they can book me. AC's phone lines are notoriously clogged (even for UA agents apparently), and I'm usually on hold with UA (who is on hold with AC) for a long time trying to make the change, while the clock is ticking down to make the new flight.
Do we know why this connection isn't as seamless as with other airlines? Is it due to the systems they are on?
Do we know why this connection isn't as seamless as with other airlines? Is it due to the systems they are on?
#25
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SJC
Programs: Southwest, Alaska, United, American Airlines
Posts: 994
My understanding is that it doesn't need to be called in if there is availability as a Ua codeshare. Out of YYZ, going transborder, shouldn't be an issue in most cases as most (though potentially not all) AC flights have a Ua codeshare number. Though I'm not sure if there is a time limitation (i.e., codeshares can only be sold until X hours prior to departure).
Codeshare flights are not supposed to be used for IRROPS re-protection, for a number of reasons.
#26
Join Date: Oct 2002
Programs: United Premier 1K
Posts: 1,230
Interesting. Thanks for that. I still wish though that UA and AC would find a way to automate it more (I realize that's probably asking too much when they can't even get IT right for each of their own airlines)
#28
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SJC
Programs: Southwest, Alaska, United, American Airlines
Posts: 994
One reason is avoiding problems of phantom availability on the codeshare flight. At some point within T-24 (exact time varies by airline) the inventory data displayed by the marketing carrier may not always correspond to actual availability with the operating airline. Additionally, in some cases, the migration of res and e-ticket data from the marketing carrier to the operating airline is not instantaneous once a flight moves to management in the departure control system.
Therefore, in order to minimize further customer inconvenience, the true code of the operating carrier should be used whenever possible.
Therefore, in order to minimize further customer inconvenience, the true code of the operating carrier should be used whenever possible.