Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

SFO-AKL JV w/NZ, all year UA metal, 77W Nov18-Mar19, 772 Apr19-Oct19 (+newORD-AKL NZ)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jul 1, 2016, 10:36 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: IBJoel
27 March 2018
Air New Zealand service between Auckland and Chicago

From Nov. 30, 2018, Air New Zealand will operate three times weekly, year-round service with its new configuration Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner aircraft. Flight time will be approximately 15 hours northbound and just over 16 hours southbound. Air New Zealand code share service will be offered on around 100 flights across the U.S. for convenient connections to Auckland via Chicago. United Airlines operates more flights from its hub at O'Hare International Airport than any other airline, with more than 500 flights to 147 airports across the United States.

United expands service between San Francisco and Auckland


Beginning in April 2019, United will extend service between its West Coast hub in San Francisco and Auckland to year-round with three-times-weekly service. In partnership with Air New Zealand, United's flight arriving in Auckland will offer passengers more than 20 connections across the region. The return trip utilizes United's extensive route network in San Francisco, which provides connections to the United States, Canada, and Latin America. United operates more than 290 daily flights from its hub at San Francisco International Airport to 79 airports across the U.S. and 26 international destinations. Tickets for the expanded San Francisco schedule will be available on united.com and airnewzealand.com later this year.

United service between San Francisco and Auckland will operate with a Boeing 777-300ER between November and March and will operate with Boeing 777-200ER aircraft between April and October.
Originally Posted by jimyvr
UA will now fly the 77W on SFO AKL when it resumes operation 29OCT17 - 22MAR18 (from SFO). Overall frequency will be 6 weekly, and increasing to 7 weekly from mid-Dec. UA73/74 is canceled.

http://www.routesonline.com/news/38/...as-of-01sep17/
United Airlines suspends NZ service (Suspension Period: April 18, 2017 - October 30, 2017)

Per New Zealand Herald quoting UA:

This change is in response to seasonal variations, which will also see United Airlines adding an additional three flights per week starting December 18, 2017 after resuming its daily Auckland to San Francisco services on October 31, 2017. This will increase services to a total of 10 United's flights per week during the high seasonal demand period. Passengers who have already purchased tickets during the suspended period are being contacted by the airline and offered flights on the Air New Zealand service instead. We apologise to customers for any inconvenience and advise that customers will not be out of pocket as a result of this shift in scheduling and will retain all frequent flyer benefits."
Print Wikipost

SFO-AKL JV w/NZ, all year UA metal, 77W Nov18-Mar19, 772 Apr19-Oct19 (+newORD-AKL NZ)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2015, 9:21 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: 1K
Posts: 784
Please let this be true!
hookthem is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 9:20 am
  #47  
Senior Moderator; Moderator, Eco-Conscious Travel, United and Flyertalk Cares
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fulltime travel/mostly Europe
Programs: UA 1.7 MM;; Accor & Marriott Pt; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 17,831
Originally Posted by greg99
When? Nonstop? Not in the last 16 or so years. LAX, yes.

Greg
Now I'm questioning my memory. I found receipts to 2002 to lax, but that's all I can find.
l etoile is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 10:11 am
  #48  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: The electrified part of North Carolina
Programs: UA GM, AA GM, DL GM
Posts: 4,157
Originally Posted by SFO_FT
An AA service LAX-AKL also makes sense as QF is quite keen to have a NZ-USA oneworld service.
QF cut their LAX-AKL service less than 3 years ago, so it doesn't seem they're very eager to serve NZ-US. What has changed since they cut their service?
UA1K_no_more is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 10:18 am
  #49  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: The electrified part of North Carolina
Programs: UA GM, AA GM, DL GM
Posts: 4,157
Originally Posted by wco81
Yeah when you look at the choices between NZ or taking UA to SYD and then flying back east to AUK, it's simply not competitive.
I wonder why...
UA1K_no_more is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 10:33 am
  #50  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
Well there are people who study glaciers so they might be interested in direct flights between the arctic and the antarctic or nearby regions.

wco81 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 10:35 am
  #51  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Programs: AA CONCIERGE KEY & 1MM, HILTON DIAMOND
Posts: 11,970
Originally Posted by wco81
Well there are people who study glaciers so they might be interested in direct flights between the arctic and the antarctic or nearby regions.

NZ used to offer such flights before they had a fatal crash, alas.
fly747first is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 11:21 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: All of them, UA-Plat, 1MM*G
Posts: 881
Originally Posted by fly747first
NZ used to offer such flights before they had a fatal crash, alas.
And UA used to offer 747 service between HNL and AKL and had, unfortunately, a fatal accident for nine of its passengers. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_811
seenitall is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 12:15 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: Marriott Ambassador, UA Mileage Plus 1K, AA Executive Plat, Marriott Ambassador Elite
Posts: 2,344
Originally Posted by mre5765
I am sure if the city hadn't allowed international flights out of HOU, UA would have tried IAH/AKL. Now whether UA expected the route to make money is a different question.
had the merger between CO / UA never happened, then we may have seen IAH-AKL come to fruition. However, with two west coast hubs thrown into the mix, it made no sense to offer a flight into IAH.
CALMSP is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 6:47 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EWR, PHL
Programs: UA1k 3MM, AA Plt, peasant on everybody else, elite something or other at a bunch of hotels.
Posts: 4,637
Originally Posted by UA1K_no_more
QF cut their LAX-AKL service less than 3 years ago, so it doesn't seem they're very eager to serve NZ-US. What has changed since they cut their service?
Perhaps the 787 makes this a (more?) viable option. QF ran a 744 on this route, which then continued on to MEL, at least the time I took it.
1kBill is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 7:16 pm
  #55  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,224
Originally Posted by 1kBill
Perhaps the 787 makes this a (more?) viable option. QF ran a 744 on this route, which then continued on to MEL, at least the time I took it.
The 787 makes many routes more viable but it's even more viable simply to substitute it for a less efficient plane on an existing route - and then retire that plane, which seems to be the core plan
lhrsfo is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2015, 1:49 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Programs: United mileage Plus 1k and Million Miler, Krisflyer, Air New Zealand, Qantas, Virgin
Posts: 211
I was pondering the routing potential and was wondering if this was related to NZ's announcement that it was adding another US flight. Is there reciprocity involved here somewhere? If NZ gains a US route, surely it has to give something back for this.

A secondary issue had me wondering about NZ's recent closer ties to SQ. Last year NZ returned to Singapore and SQ added more flights to NZ, with both offering more fluid code share. Is something similar in works for US/NZ?
syrahnose is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2015, 2:00 pm
  #57  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: The electrified part of North Carolina
Programs: UA GM, AA GM, DL GM
Posts: 4,157
Originally Posted by 1kBill
Perhaps the 787 makes this a (more?) viable option. QF ran a 744 on this route, which then continued on to MEL, at least the time I took it.
It was an A333 during the last period before the cancellation, and the aircraft was also used for the LAX-JFK-LAX turn. The 787 would obviously give better fuel economy, but with two or three daily NZ LAX-AKL flights, there may not be enough demand for another flight.
UA1K_no_more is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2015, 2:40 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canada
Programs: Star Alliance G*, Marriott Bonvoy Titanium,
Posts: 3,585
NZ v. UA

Originally Posted by dvs7310
UA has E+ which NZ doesn't
Is this really true? NZ has the Sky Couch, no??

It is certainly true that NZ's leisure fares do not accrue MP credits (nor AP credits, for that matter).

It is also true that NZ fares are much higher than Aussie fares, reflecting its monopoly status. That's why I am routing to AKL via SIN (on SQ).

Currently, UA channels its Kiwi-bound passengers via SYD & MEL, so a new dedicated SFO-AKL route would divert some of these passengers.
Antonio8069 is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2015, 6:05 pm
  #59  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,140
Originally Posted by Antonio8069
Is this really true? NZ has the Sky Couch, no?
What I suspect the OP meant was that NZ doesn't have "extra legroom with no other benfits for free". What they have is real Premium Economy, which costs.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2015, 6:14 pm
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by syrahnose
I was pondering the routing potential and was wondering if this was related to NZ's announcement that it was adding another US flight. Is there reciprocity involved here somewhere? If NZ gains a US route, surely it has to give something back for this.
I may be misunderstanding your post (and if so, please forgive me), but New Zealand and the USA have an open skies treaty, so airlines from both countries can begin as many new flights as they want between the two countries without specific approval. Of course, the airlines still have to meet basic fitness requirements, etc. It's not like the USA and China, where both countries airlines have limited numbers of frequencies and the airlines have to ask their own governments for permission to use some of those limited frequencies.
FWAAA is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.