Someone took my luggage

Old Jan 27, 2015, 5:58 pm
  #16  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.99MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,731
Originally Posted by tyc
... It was not a small add on lock, it was the built in lock and handle, measuring 2 by 3 inches each. ....
As mention, entering and traveling in the USA, non-TSA approved locks can be forced open without your involvement / permission. Hence not a good idea to use such lock if in the USA.
Originally Posted by tyc
... ... So, I thought I check with this community to see if there are other occurrences.
The thief of luggage is organized groups is common -- just google it. SFO (my home airport) seems to have a flair-up every 2-3 years. I'm not sure but I think I may have been a near victim -- I caught someone with my bag leaving the carousel area, and they said "sorry" and then left the area (did not go back to get "their" bag).

The mistaken pickup of luggage is a daily occurrence at any major airport -- I seen it happen and caught at the carousel a couple times a year.


http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...d-luggage.html

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...age-claim.html

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...iversions.html

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...hes-thief.html
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 6:12 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: QFF Gold, Flying Blue, Enrich
Posts: 5,366
Originally Posted by mgcsinc
And if it was a TSA-approved lock, it's precisely as effective as a little sticker that says "pls do not open thx."

Locking luggage is a fool's errand.
not really. Locking luggage helps prevent zippers coming loose. Last time I lost my lock I "locked" my suitcase with a keyring. It's not to keep it safe from someone opening it, it's to prevent it accidentally coming apart.
BadgerBoi is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 6:16 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 8,634
Originally Posted by BadgerBoi
not really. Locking luggage helps prevent zippers coming loose. Last time I lost my lock I "locked" my suitcase with a keyring. It's not to keep it safe from someone opening it, it's to prevent it accidentally coming apart.
I agree that if your purpose is not actually to lock your luggage, then locking it might serve your purpose.

For most people, the purpose of locking luggage is... to lock the luggage.
mgcsinc is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 6:40 pm
  #19  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,084
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
The mistaken pickup of luggage is a daily occurrence at any major airport -- I seen it happen and caught at the carousel a couple times a year.
Yes, it is. I've even had someone step in front of me while at the carousel and grab my bag (when I was standing very near the start of the belt). An honest mistake based on circumstances I won't elaborate on, but still, I have a huge FT tag and another fairly large custom name tag on my bags, and have an "off" color which isn't as common (a dark red, and a light blue set--when the majority is black, bold red, or bold blue it seems).
exerda is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 6:42 pm
  #20  
tyc
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Boston
Programs: UA GS MM
Posts: 129
Sorry that I might have been uncleared in the of word 'lock'. The samsonite hardcase suitcase comes with one main and two side 'clamps'. The clamps keep the suitcase securely closed. The main clamp has a built in combination lock and the side clamp has a built in lock with key. I never use any of the locks when I check in luggage due to TSA screening, although I use the combination lock on the clamp frequently when I am in a hoteL.

It make me wonder when:
1. He uses the same suitcase as me, so he should know how to open up the clamp (non-locked). Instead a bar was used to plier it opened.
2. All the clamps of his own suitcase have been replaced by 3rd party parts (light brown, diff color from the black suitcase) may suggest that they were all broken and needed to be replaced. And those contrasting color of the replacement parts that were riveted on with a big piece of leather, served as distinct markings of his bag.
3. I lost a bag with valuable clothing items a few years ago and was never found.

I still think it was all a coincidence and innocent mistake, but just want to do a quick ask if similar incidents happened in this location that may suggest otherwise based on the factors mentioned.

Last edited by tyc; Jan 27, 2015 at 6:56 pm
tyc is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 6:47 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,356
Originally Posted by tyc
Sorry that I might have been uncleared in the of word 'lock'. The samsonite hardcase suitcase comes with one main and two side 'clamps'. The clamps keep the suitcase securely closed. The main clamp has a built in combination lock and the side clamp has a built in lock with key. I never use any of the locks when I check in luggage due to TSA screening, although I use the combination lock on the clamp frequently when I am in a hoteL.

It make me wonder when:
1. He uses the same suitcase as me, so he should know how to open up the clamp (non-locked). Instead a bar was used to plier it opened.
2. All the clamps of his suitcase have been replaced by 3rd party parts (light brown, diff color from the black suitcase) may suggest that they were all broken and needed to be replaced.
3. I lost a bag with valuable clothing items a few years ago and was never found.
Life is short -- for some relief, I recommend watching "What's Up Doc," from 1972 (Barbra Streisand, Ryan O'Neill) and still worth the time!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069495/?ref_=ttmd_md_nm

"The accidental mix up of four identical plaid overnight bags leads to a series of increasingly wild and wacky situations."
AndyPatterson is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 6:49 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: QFF Gold, Flying Blue, Enrich
Posts: 5,366
Originally Posted by mgcsinc
I agree that if your purpose is not actually to lock your luggage, then locking it might serve your purpose.

For most people, the purpose of locking luggage is... to lock the luggage.
and so I agree with you also - that's pointless. I have a TSA lock on my new bag, I intend keeping it closed but at the default combination of 000, so if anyone wants to steal my dirty socks and spare gastric reflux pills at least they might get in without damaging my lovely new bag. Locking it to actually lock it? Dumb.
BadgerBoi is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 7:05 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,396
Originally Posted by BadgerBoi
not really. Locking luggage helps prevent zippers coming loose. Last time I lost my lock I "locked" my suitcase with a keyring. It's not to keep it safe from someone opening it, it's to prevent it accidentally coming apart.
This is the main reason.

There's also the issue of dirty baggage handlers. A locked suitcase takes more time to get into, they'll be more likely to go for the unlocked one.

Locks are completely useless against thieves that make off with bags.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 7:09 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: QFF Gold, Flying Blue, Enrich
Posts: 5,366
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
This is the main reason.

There's also the issue of dirty baggage handlers. A locked suitcase takes more time to get into, they'll be more likely to go for the unlocked one.

Locks are completely useless against thieves that make off with bags.
I rather liked my key ring solution, but it took me forever to get the damned bag open with that thing securing it. I could at least open the lost lock with a toothpick in a jiffy.
BadgerBoi is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 7:21 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: All of them, UA-Plat, 1MM*G
Posts: 881
I am not sure I agree with the other posters that UA bears no responsibility here. The OP checked his bag with UA. When bags came out on the belt, his was never presented to him. OP has no way of knowing when the bag went missing. When the bag was returned to him by UA, it was damaged. It doesn't matter to the OP whether the damage was inflicted by UA or by the person that UA allowed to pick up the bag. Until UA returned the bag to the OP who checked it (and not just anyone who happened to pick it off the belt), UA is responsible for it.

I think the OP is owed damaged bag compensation by UA.
seenitall is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 7:54 pm
  #26  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Originally Posted by seenitall
I am not sure I agree with the other posters that UA bears no responsibility here. The OP checked his bag with UA. When bags came out on the belt, his was never presented to him. OP has no way of knowing when the bag went missing. When the bag was returned to him by UA, it was damaged. It doesn't matter to the OP whether the damage was inflicted by UA or by the person that UA allowed to pick up the bag. Until UA returned the bag to the OP who checked it (and not just anyone who happened to pick it off the belt), UA is responsible for it.

I think the OP is owed damaged bag compensation by UA.
UA delivered the bag to the carousel. That's the end of the line, the story and liability.
Often1 is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 7:59 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok or San Francisco
Programs: United 1k, Marriott Lifetime PE, Former DL Gold, Former SQ Solitaire, HH Gold
Posts: 11,886
Originally Posted by seenitall
I am not sure I agree with the other posters that UA bears no responsibility here. The OP checked his bag with UA. When bags came out on the belt, his was never presented to him. OP has no way of knowing when the bag went missing. When the bag was returned to him by UA, it was damaged. It doesn't matter to the OP whether the damage was inflicted by UA or by the person that UA allowed to pick up the bag. Until UA returned the bag to the OP who checked it (and not just anyone who happened to pick it off the belt), UA is responsible for it.

I think the OP is owed damaged bag compensation by UA.
United doesn't "present" the bag. They put it on the belt. After that it's out of their control. If anyone failed, it's airport security.

In this particular case the OP knows that the guy picked the wrong bag off the belt.
Tchiowa is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 8:08 pm
  #28  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atherton, CA
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP; Owner, Green Bay Packers
Posts: 21,690
Cool

Originally Posted by euslaner
Why would United be responsible for someone taking your luggage?
In this case, it seems pretty clear that the airlines' choice not to provide security and match bag tags to their owner contributed significantly to the episode. Since they provided such security in the past, is is clearly feasible but not cost effective. Therefore, the airline should pay damages, and seek to recover that from the person who took the luggage if they wish.

They've made the choice to not provide adequate security and should pay the alternative price, i.e., making the customer whole.
Doc Savage is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 8:35 pm
  #29  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,084
Although it's most likely the person who mistakenly took the bag is the one who damaged the locks (probably saying to himself, "Why isn't my key or combo working?!?!"), how is the OP supposed to know it wasn't UA or the TSA who damaged it?

I am surprised that airport authorities haven't been hit with legal action over the years for basically allowing anyone off the street to waltz in and steal bags off the belts. Even putting baggage claim behind some kind of security (e.g. exit the secure area to baggage claim, but to get into baggage claim from the street, you have to show ID & a recent BP) wouldn't solve the problem entirely; I don't know what the solution is. But it does seem like airport authorities are just putting a big "steal me!" sign on bags.
exerda is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2015, 8:43 pm
  #30  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS 75k, AA Plat, Bonvoyed Gold, Honors Dia, Hyatt Explorer, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 16,780
Originally Posted by exerda
I am surprised that airport authorities haven't been hit with legal action over the years for basically allowing anyone off the street to waltz in and steal bags off the belts. Even putting baggage claim behind some kind of security (e.g. exit the secure area to baggage claim, but to get into baggage claim from the street, you have to show ID & a recent BP) wouldn't solve the problem entirely; I don't know what the solution is. But it does seem like airport authorities are just putting a big "steal me!" sign on bags.
iIRC, Oakland used to have security guards in baggage claim matching bag stubs to the tags on bags when passengers were leaving the claims area. Very much doubt that they still do that. At SFO on the other hand, you can do a drive-by pickup of random bags: run from a waiting car in the arrivals area to a conveyor, grab a bag, and be back at the car in a few seconds. Just don't take WineCountryUA's bag.
notquiteaff is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.