Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

American Express AX Centurion Lounge at SFO & IAH (IAH Opened Jun 24, 2016 @ Term D)

American Express AX Centurion Lounge at SFO & IAH (IAH Opened Jun 24, 2016 @ Term D)

Old Jan 4, 2015, 2:04 pm
  #76  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,900
Originally Posted by elCheapoDeluxe
I keep my UC membership for one reason: expedited re-routing assistance during weather / mis-connects / adverse events, etc. I can get the 1K line to do some of the work, but some things at the end often require a person in front of you - particularly if you are getting rerouted on another carrier and need a ticket endorsed over. 80% of my trips I don't even bother going in - that's how appealing they are. But... can Amex do better? Back to that one reason....
This. Everything else is secondary. The UC agents have saved my butt any number of times.
milepig is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 2:05 pm
  #77  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,165
Originally Posted by elCheapoDeluxe
I keep my UC membership for one reason: expedited re-routing assistance during weather / mis-connects / adverse events, etc. I can get the 1K line to do some of the work, but some things at the end often require a person in front of you - particularly if you are getting rerouted on another carrier and need a ticket endorsed over. 80% of my trips I don't even bother going in - that's how appealing they are. But... can Amex do better? Back to that one reason....
I'm getting to that point too - getting to the airport a bit later now, hanging out in Tortas Frontera or (formerly) Vino Volo a bit longer pre-flight, etc. Helps that I get my membership free via work otherwise there's no damn way I'd pay the current prices for it.
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 2:18 pm
  #78  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: London; Bangkok; Las Vegas
Programs: AA Exec Plat; UA MM Gold; Marriott Lifetime Titanium; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,741
Originally Posted by mre5765
And how long will the UCs be full when AMEX continues to build lounges in UA concourses. People aren't stupid, especially the type of people who fly frequently enough to justiify an airline club membership. I won't be renewing my UC membership.
People aren't stupid? That is a debatable point since they are continuing to fly United.

If they aren't choosier about the airline they fly, why would you expect them to be choosier about the lounge they pay to visit?

The only reason I can see to pay for UC access is access to the agents in the lounge if there is flight problem that day, but I just call United on the phone anyway when that happens.

I had free UC access the past decade due to my Gold status with LH and only used the agents once, and they didn't know what they were doing. Another agent had to take over to finish the task (and it wasn't that complicated).

Originally Posted by Shareholder
Admirals Clubs are still doing a booming business at DFW and LGA where there are Centurion Clubs so little likelihood of that happening if new ones are co-located in UA terminal areas.
The only Centurion Lounge I have visited was the one in DFW. I was underwhelmed, to put it mildly. I didn't find it any better than the AA lounge in the same terminal.
Always Flyin is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 4:39 pm
  #79  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PWM
Programs: AA Plat
Posts: 1,332
Originally Posted by SFHokie
or a one-day "cover charge"
They already have this. It's a whopping $50!!!
sexykitten7 is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 8:05 pm
  #80  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by Always Flyin


People aren't stupid? That is a debatable point since they are continuing to fly United.

If they aren't choosier about the airline they fly, why would you expect them to be choosier about the lounge they pay to visit?
Well I went from about 170K PQMs in 2013 to about 45K PQMs in 2014. Call me stupid for the 45K bis on UA metal, but I didn't see a more or as direct flight option between COS and California. I suppose it would have been "smart" to take RJs all the time on DL or Alaska, or fly Allegient via LAS. Right?

There are only four major mainlines, and at times, UA is the best option.


Originally Posted by Always Flyin

The only Centurion Lounge I have visited was the one in DFW. I was underwhelmed, to put it mildly. I didn't find it any better than the AA lounge in the same terminal.
The booze is better, and it is free. There is a full buffet all day with food as good as you will get at any diner in D concourse. There is a spa. Other than that it is no better. On the negative side, the office area of the centurion lounge isn't very good for taking phone calls. When I know I will be more than an hour on the phone, I use the AC unless the one conference room (free, unlike an airline club lounge) is available.

By any objective measure, the Centurion Lounges are better than UCs and ACs, but the ACs are nice enough that if an AA FFer uses lots of non Centurion stations, an AC membership might be worth it.

Again this thread is about UCs vs Centurions, and I think the latter will impact the former.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 8:09 pm
  #81  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jersey Shore/YYZ
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat, Hilton Diamond, Hertz PC
Posts: 12,521
One has to admit that the AmEx Platinum is a card that many folks (including me) would be interested in - if there were more Centurion lounges, and if DL and UA were in the same terminals. Having both DL and Centurion access for a net price of ~$200 (and including the Global Entry fee now) is tempting - alas, for a Newark hub captive, not worth it for me.
aacharya is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 8:13 pm
  #82  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,067
If AMEX can plug the EWR, ORD, DEN and to some extent IAD holes, the United Club is dead.
channa is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 8:14 pm
  #83  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: IAH
Programs: DL DM, Hyatt Ist-iest, Stariott Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 12,760
Originally Posted by sexykitten7
They already have this. It's a whopping $50!!!
Except when it's not... I've seen posters outside the UCs at IAH offering discounted admission for $30 or 35. Still $20 or $25 more than it's worth if I'm paying cash.

Originally Posted by channa
If AMEX can plug the EWR, ORD, DEN and to some extent IAD holes, the United Club is dead.
Add IAH to that and you've got yourself a gigantic amount of converts. IAH at least has lots of space vs. ORD. Not sure about the rest... The only non-UC lounge that's accessible is the KLM Crown Lounge via Priority Pass. Thankfully it's all the way in Terminal D so it's normally not at all crowded. A Centurion Lounge at IAH would cement me as a Plat card holder as long as I live here.
krazykanuck is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 8:18 pm
  #84  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,899
Originally Posted by channa
If AMEX can plug the EWR, ORD, DEN and to some extent IAD holes, the United Club is dead.
Most people I know have no desire to have an Amex card. Too many merchants don't take it. And I certainly wouldn't get one just to go into their lounges.
Baze is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 9:24 pm
  #85  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Programs: Lifetime UA 1K, Lifetime Hilton Diamond, Lifetime Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 1,261
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
People aren't stupid? That is a debatable point since they are continuing to fly United.
Unfortunately if you live in Denver you are stuck on United. It is difficult to fly American or Delta unless you want to connect most of the time.
bldr1k is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 11:46 pm
  #86  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: LAX
Programs: United Silver, 0.9MM
Posts: 133
Originally Posted by SFHokie
  • Better atmosphere, seating arrangements
  • Shower facilities
  • Hot and cold food items prepared fresh
  • Much larger selection of complimentary wines, alcohol, coffee, teas
  • Waitstaff that walk around with small round trays instead of ugly grey plastic carts
  • The "feel" of more attention instead of "just another passenger" from anyone you encounter
  • Cloth napkins and actual plates & silverware for the food
Seating arrangements, fine I can get that
Shower facilities, who cares. Honestly who takes a shower at a airport?
Hot and cold food items. Meh. If I'm hungry I'd rather go to a real restaurant to waste my time, not eating tiny apps
Complimentary wine/alcohol, fine I get that I guess
Waitstaff walking around, who cares
Cloth napkins, lol who cares

I don't really understand people's obsession with and critique of airport lounges.

I never pay for access, just not worth it for me. Do I go into them for free? Sure why not, but to me its not a big deal at all. Honestly the biggest difference is just it being a bit quieter and somewhat more comfortable seats.

People willing to pay $350 or whatever the Club Card costs boggles my mind. I think part of it has to do with their delusion that they are part of some exclusive club when in fact there are ways to cheat the system and get into almost any UC for free. And even for those who don't know how to do that, you can get a one time pass off ebay for like $15 if you want to see how the "exclusive" people waste their time at airports.
robbgrn is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 11:57 pm
  #87  
TA
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: if it's Thursday, this must be Belgium
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 6,481
Don't allow yourself to imagine that the AMEX clubs would be as good if they had the level of traffic and type of passenger that UA clubs do. See how long they would be offering the better food/drink/amenities if the trays were being emptied out every 10 minutes, people left messes all over the place, and the place were packed with people who pay nothing but incur a lot of resources.

The main reason that you like the Centurion lounge is because there are few people there -- and the resulting higher quality of service that permits. If they (or UA) had to charge what that type of lounge really costs to operate I think you would be quickly turned off that idea.

Actually, I correct myself. There is a lounge that parallels the AMEX lounge, and offers you the chance to pay for that level of service -- the UA First Class lounge. And I think you can figure out what membership to that lounge will cost you.
TA is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 12:00 am
  #88  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 8,634
Originally Posted by robbgrn
in fact there are ways to cheat the system and get into almost any UC for free
Lolz, what praytell would those be?
mgcsinc is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 12:03 am
  #89  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LAX
Posts: 10,904
Originally Posted by TA
Don't allow yourself to imagine that the AMEX clubs would be as good if they had the level of traffic and type of passenger that UA clubs do. See how long they would be offering the better food/drink/amenities if the trays were being emptied out every 10 minutes, people left messes all over the place, and the place were packed with people who pay nothing but consume a lot of resources.

The main reason that you like the Centurion lounge is because there are few people there -- and the resulting higher quality of service that permits. If they (or UA) had to charge what that type of lounge really costs to operate I think you would be quickly turned off that idea.

This.
Also i happened to be in LAS centurion lounge when they had to turn people away as they exceeded capacity - it was not pretty.
azepine00 is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 12:14 am
  #90  
TA
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: if it's Thursday, this must be Belgium
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 6,481
Originally Posted by mgcsinc
Lolz, what praytell would those be?
I'm guessing he's talking about the methods of unscrupulously purchasing premium tickets solely for the purpose of getting into the clubs.

Anyway. If you look at the lounge phenomenon from a curious scientific point of view -- there is no successful evolutionary niche that has been occupied by an affordable, non-subsidized, yet high quality premium lounge in the US. That bird is not able to survive in this passenger environment... (just as the odd evolutionary beak shape experiments of 3 class passenger transcon US service, all-premium US-Europe service, or long-haul low cost service are dying or have died shortly after launch).
TA is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.