Advice Sought on the Best Option for Flying SFO-FRA in Economy
#16
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: between SFO & SJC
Programs: UA 1MM (and no longer flying much)
Posts: 777
I fly SFO-FRA-XXX a few times a year. A few thoughts.
1. Don't connect, don't connect, don't connect. If you do you'll have a much longer flight and a real risk of misconnects (both due to SFO and due to ZZZ in SFO-ZZZ-FRA).
2. I think the choice between non stops on UA vs LH depends crucially on your height. If you're over 5'9'' I'd go for UA (for the possibility of E+, even if it's less legroom than E+ on non-747 aircraft). If you're <5'9'' I'd recommend LH.
3. Another consideration is that on discount fares, LH won't assign seats. UA will (and you should check out the seat map as you book).
1. Don't connect, don't connect, don't connect. If you do you'll have a much longer flight and a real risk of misconnects (both due to SFO and due to ZZZ in SFO-ZZZ-FRA).
2. I think the choice between non stops on UA vs LH depends crucially on your height. If you're over 5'9'' I'd go for UA (for the possibility of E+, even if it's less legroom than E+ on non-747 aircraft). If you're <5'9'' I'd recommend LH.
3. Another consideration is that on discount fares, LH won't assign seats. UA will (and you should check out the seat map as you book).
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco
Programs: GM on VX, UA, AA, HA, AS, SY; Budget Fastbreak
Posts: 27,601
SFO - FRA advice
I concur for the nonstop sfo-fra. Even e+ sucks on the 747 (ual), but if your work (and personal schedule) allows it, try to stay an extra night before you start working there so that your body has extra time to adjust to jet lag. And get a sandwich or something yummy at sfo before you board because it'll taste better than what you receive on the plane.
#18
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,394
If you do take the connection, do not do through EWR or IAD as the flight is much shorter...more time via ORD to get an OK night's sleep...just pop an ambien and put your head up against the window.
On that topic, doesn't the united flight from SFO leave much later in the day allowing you to be more ready to fall asleep?
On that topic, doesn't the united flight from SFO leave much later in the day allowing you to be more ready to fall asleep?
#19
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 690
I would add to that list that LH has a tendency to run cabins on the warm side. For many people, that would be OK, but I find it uncomfortable.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jersey Shore/YYZ
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat, Hilton Diamond, Hertz PC
Posts: 12,521
If I were the OP, I'd shoot for a W fare, and try for a GPU upgrade on UA metal. As long as it's UA metal (easier if an 016 ticket), then it can be done. I know it can be done on LH metal with the new e-GPU request process, but I'm not as familiar with that.
#22
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,796
I fly SFO-FRA-XXX a few times a year. A few thoughts.
1. Don't connect, don't connect, don't connect. If you do you'll have a much longer flight and a real risk of misconnects (both due to SFO and due to ZZZ in SFO-ZZZ-FRA).
2. I think the choice between non stops on UA vs LH depends crucially on your height. If you're over 5'9'' I'd go for UA (for the possibility of E+, even if it's less legroom than E+ on non-747 aircraft). If you're <5'9'' I'd recommend LH.
3. Another consideration is that on discount fares, LH won't assign seats. UA will (and you should check out the seat map as you book).
1. Don't connect, don't connect, don't connect. If you do you'll have a much longer flight and a real risk of misconnects (both due to SFO and due to ZZZ in SFO-ZZZ-FRA).
2. I think the choice between non stops on UA vs LH depends crucially on your height. If you're over 5'9'' I'd go for UA (for the possibility of E+, even if it's less legroom than E+ on non-747 aircraft). If you're <5'9'' I'd recommend LH.
3. Another consideration is that on discount fares, LH won't assign seats. UA will (and you should check out the seat map as you book).
I have flow SFO-FRA a few times and IIRC the IFE that plays on your tablet or laptop is pretty. Lots of movies. Just remember to download the latest app prior to getting on the plane.
E+ and a direct. Hard to argue with that. Lufthansa economy is painful
#24
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Programs: Marriott LT Titanium Elite, United LT 1M Gold
Posts: 552
#25
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
#26
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 261
Regarding UA IFE on the 747, it's much improved. Assuming you have ISP, which seems to be showing up more frequently. My last flight was in BF and I actually ended up using the streaming entertainment rather that what was on my PTV because the selection was better
#27
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redwood City, CA USA (SFO/SJC)
Programs: 1K 2010, 1P in 2011, Plat for 2012,13,14,15 & 2016. Gold in 17 & 18, Plat since
Posts: 8,826
I was initially in the camp of avoiding the 747 for the OP's trip like the plague, but reason has prevailed; the main point to the trip is not the flight but rather the destination, and a non-stop is going to be a better choice in January.
If nothing else, bad weather tends to cancel shorter flights first, even when the shorter flight is a TCON mainline. So you're more likely to "drill through" bad weather at SFO on the 747 to FRA than on a 737 to ORD or IAD.
#28
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: WAS-ish
Programs: UA 1K-MM + UC, Marriott Plat, National Exec
Posts: 1,341
The exit row aisle seats -- 45C and 45H -- on a 747 are excellent seats for long-haul. Infinite legroom, and the people next to you can get out without waking you up. Bring a camp stool for a footrest (or use your rollaboard), pop some Ambien, and you've got a pretty decent ride.
Of course, there's nothing else to recommend the 747 in Y... and, unfortunately, you have to be Gold or above to pre-reserve the exit rows. (That said, they open up within 24 hours with surprisingly frequency, probably because the sort of people that grab 45C/45H also tend to put in GPU requests.
Which means it's probably not relevant to the OP. However, I figured it was worth pointing out that there are reasons to choose the 747 in Y over the alternatives. (Well, one, at least).
Of course, there's nothing else to recommend the 747 in Y... and, unfortunately, you have to be Gold or above to pre-reserve the exit rows. (That said, they open up within 24 hours with surprisingly frequency, probably because the sort of people that grab 45C/45H also tend to put in GPU requests.
Which means it's probably not relevant to the OP. However, I figured it was worth pointing out that there are reasons to choose the 747 in Y over the alternatives. (Well, one, at least).
#29
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Programs: Marriott LT Titanium Elite, United LT 1M Gold
Posts: 552
The exit row aisle seats -- 45C and 45H -- on a 747 are excellent seats for long-haul. Infinite legroom, and the people next to you can get out without waking you up. Bring a camp stool for a footrest (or use your rollaboard), pop some Ambien, and you've got a pretty decent ride.
#30
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Suburban Philadelphia
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG Gold
Posts: 3,392
As a silver I was 100% on E+. I agree on the UA bird, last time I was in Y on LH I vowed it would be my last.