Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UA 777 PMco BusinessFirst vs Thai 777 Royal Silk

UA 777 PMco BusinessFirst vs Thai 777 Royal Silk

Old Dec 17, 2014, 5:05 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: EWR
Programs: UA Plat, KE Morning Calm, Hertz Gold, SPG Plat
Posts: 57
UA 777 PMco BusinessFirst vs Thai 777 Royal Silk

I need to fly back from ICN to NYC on Xmas day.

award ticket only shows either ICN-PEK with CA and UA from PEK to EWR on BusinessFirst for 70k miles OR ICN-LAX on Thai 777 Royal Silk then PS BusinessFirst from LAX-JFK for 80k miles.

What are Flyertalker's preferences?
bryanlee81 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 5:16 pm
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,298
Originally Posted by bryanlee81
I need to fly back from ICN to NYC on Xmas day.

award ticket only shows either ICN-PEK with CA and UA from PEK to EWR on BusinessFirst for 70k miles OR ICN-LAX on Thai 777 Royal Silk then PS BusinessFirst from LAX-JFK for 80k miles.

What are Flyertalker's preferences?
TG is now flying the 77W on that route. That's the winner as far as I'm concerned.

1. Equivalent hard product TG vs. UA.
2. Better service on TG.
3. Avoid PEK connection (most delayed major airport in the world).
4. If your connection's long enough, enjoy the *A lounge at TBIT.

Watch also for OZ to open space on OZ202 (A380).
Kacee is online now  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 5:17 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: UA Plat, Copa Pres. Plat, Hyatt Diamond, Hilton Diamond, SPG LT Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 769
If it were me, I'd go with the ICN-PEK-EWR route. Benefits:
  • Saves 10K miles
  • No need to connect after clearing customs in LAX
  • Less flight time (though some might consider this a downside)

I don't find TG's Royal Silk to be anything special, especially if that 777 is a 773 and not a 77W (7 across vs. 4 across in J)
(can ignore this last part per Kacee's confirmation of 77W)

Last edited by milesmuncher; Dec 17, 2014 at 5:19 pm Reason: updating based on new info from Kacee
milesmuncher is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 5:36 pm
  #4  
Used to be 'thiti'
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA-PP 1MM, Hyatt-Globalist, Bonvoy-LT Titanium, Hertz-Pres Cir
Posts: 189
I took TG's BKK-ICN-LAX couple times last year and found this option better than United's. TG 77W has much better seats/beds, which all have direct aisle access. You should allow a good transit time in LAX though to move from TB terminal to T7.
Sawasdee is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 6:13 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: US
Programs: UA GS 2MM
Posts: 1,727
Kacee hit on all the excellent reasons to choose TG through LAX. The risk of misconnecting in PEK is reason enough to avoid that route.
cmhua777 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 6:47 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WAS/TYO
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP (3MM), DL PM, BONVOY TITANIUM, HYATT GLOBALIST, HILTON DIAMOND, IHG DIAMOND AMB, et al
Posts: 5,906
Originally Posted by Kacee
TG is now flying the 77W on that route. That's the winner as far as I'm concerned.

1. Equivalent hard product TG vs. UA.
2. Better service on TG.
3. Avoid PEK connection (most delayed major airport in the world).
4. If your connection's long enough, enjoy the *A lounge at TBIT.

Watch also for OZ to open space on OZ202 (A380).
I definitely agree with Kacee on going with TG and watching for OZ space to open on the A380 (which would be the best option, in my opinion).

-FlyerBeek

Last edited by FlyerBeek; Dec 17, 2014 at 9:03 pm Reason: edited post - it now appears possible to access TBIT using a domestic BP
FlyerBeek is online now  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 6:59 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 134
Originally Posted by FlyerBeek
The *A lounge at TBIT will not be accessible, however, if the OP is connecting onto LAX-JFK.

-FlyerBeek
Of course it will be. OP is departing on a star alliance flight and is *G.
Kingston is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 7:57 pm
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Programs: UA PP, AA, DL, BA, CX, SPG, HHonors
Posts: 2,002
Originally Posted by Kingston
Of course it will be. OP is departing on a star alliance flight and is *G.
I don't think the connecting boarding pass allows OP back inside TBIT after he clears immigration ... Have to proceed to T7 directly
787fan is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 8:07 pm
  #9  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
LAX reportedly now DOES allow passengers into any terminal with a BP departing LAX that day; it is a relatively recent change.

But it would require the OP to allow for the time required to leave TBIT and head over to T7 for the flight to JFK. Depending on the layover it might not be worth dealing with the extra TSA bits.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 9:02 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WAS/TYO
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP (3MM), DL PM, BONVOY TITANIUM, HYATT GLOBALIST, HILTON DIAMOND, IHG DIAMOND AMB, et al
Posts: 5,906
Originally Posted by sbm12
LAX reportedly now DOES allow passengers into any terminal with a BP departing LAX that day; it is a relatively recent change.

But it would require the OP to allow for the time required to leave TBIT and head over to T7 for the flight to JFK. Depending on the layover it might not be worth dealing with the extra TSA bits.
Sbm12, thanks for the correction. As you mention, and as posted here, it now seems possible to access TBIT using a domestic BP. This is definitely a recent change, as even the lounge webpage indicates passengers need to be departing from TBIT to access the lounge.

-FlyerBeek
FlyerBeek is online now  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 9:02 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: West Coast, USA
Programs: Skywards Platinum
Posts: 3,747
Originally Posted by Kacee
TG is now flying the 77W on that route. That's the winner as far as I'm concerned.

1. Equivalent hard product TG vs. UA.
Disagree here, the TG hard product on the 77W is not even comparable to UA, it is vastly better. It is the same seats used on EY J and EK A380 J. All-aisle access, very private, etc...
whimike is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 9:11 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 26,903
If you're worried about food, TG C food is generally poor, but UA C food ex-PEK is also horrible.
MatthewLAX is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2014, 11:45 pm
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,298
Originally Posted by whimike
Disagree here, the TG hard product on the 77W is not even comparable to UA, it is vastly better. It is the same seats used on EY J and EK A380 J. All-aisle access, very private, etc...
I'm familiar with the TG seat, I've flown it on both the 77W and the 380. It has direct aisle access but I find the cushioning less comfortable than either of the UA BF seats. And it's only private if you manage to avoid one of the paired middle seats - those are very similar to the middle seats on an sUA 763 in terms of privacy - i.e., not much at all.

IIRC correctly, TG does have better AVOD and the lavs tend to be much nicer than on any UA aircraft. But on the whole I don't think this choice gets made on hard product.

And one more thing - the fake wood and purple decor on the TG 77W is unbelievably tacky.

Last edited by Kacee; Dec 18, 2014 at 12:09 am
Kacee is online now  
Old Dec 18, 2014, 12:20 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Programs: UA 1K, AA PLT, SPG PLT
Posts: 1,612
Chalk me up for a TG vote, hands down.

Purple may be 'tacky', but their soft product is a bunch better, I think their food is much better (especially portion-size) than UA and the cheese plate and wines are much MUCH better than UA (if that matters to you).

Flying through PEK (especially if you don't have a visa, which isn't required, but read some reports here with UA and transiting on the mainland), ON UA would be awful - I wouldn't even do it if it saved me 50k miles - UA is that bad in every service level.

-jeremy
kmfdm91 is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2014, 3:36 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: West Coast, USA
Programs: Skywards Platinum
Posts: 3,747
Originally Posted by Kacee
I'm familiar with the TG seat, I've flown it on both the 77W and the 380. It has direct aisle access but I find the cushioning less comfortable than either of the UA BF seats. And it's only private if you manage to avoid one of the paired middle seats - those are very similar to the middle seats on an sUA 763 in terms of privacy - i.e., not much at all.
The 2 paired middle seats accounts for just 2 out of 8 seats, so hardly an issue unless you are booking last minute. Although, for couples, those are the preferred seats due to all other seats being too private.

The pmCO BF seats are quite nice and I like them a lot, but I still prefer the TG seats. For some reason I was thinking pmUA BF seats, where there is no comparison.
whimike is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.