Deceptive pricing on connecting itineraries {workaround to married segment pricing}
#1
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Deceptive pricing on connecting itineraries {workaround to married segment pricing}
What will UA charge on an itinerary with connecting flights? It depends on how you query the systems. The same exact flights can vary by more than 40% in cost depending on the search parameters used. Consider these examples. Which booking would you choose?
And it isn't limited to that market.
Essentially UA doesn't know how to assemble fares for connecting itineraries. Buyer beware.
And it isn't limited to that market.
Essentially UA doesn't know how to assemble fares for connecting itineraries. Buyer beware.
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
And here's what the searches look like to generate those differing results (at least for the PIT-PHX itinerary):
Search 1:
Search 2:
Search 3:
The PIT-BWI and BWI-FLL are similar.
Search 1:
Search 2:
Search 3:
The PIT-BWI and BWI-FLL are similar.
#4
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 8,634
This is a pretty well-known effect where the faring system does not apply married segments logic when you do a multi-city search. I always search both ways for that reason. I would NOT like to see this fixed, as it creates an accidental windfall for the customer.
#5
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,685
I sure as heck wouldn't call it "deceptive". It is exactly as shown. Decrptive pricing is where the bill differs from what is offered. One could call it many things, but surely not deceptive.
#6
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CT/NY
Programs: UA 1K/1MM, AA EXP, Marriott LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 6,016
Actually it does - it's doing it to maximize revenue on connections using married segments, and they have been doing this since the merger. In other cases, they'll split fare on 2 different segments instead of a through fare. Nothing new.
#7
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LHR (sometimes CLE, SFO, BOS, LAX, SEA)
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 5,892
Right, I think that the correct "fix" for this behavior would only ever cause prices to go up.
#8
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
I would agree if the pricing were different for different flights. I get that. Charge me more if I want the more efficient flight by fewer/shorter connections. But if the exact same itinerary can have multiple different prices that's not at all reasonable. This is the airline screwing passengers.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
Where's the windfall for a customer? UA is actively charging more than it should in most cases. How is that in favor of the consumer?? If they say they are offering the cheapest fare and they are not that is hardly creating a windfall. Moreover, the cheaper fare is as a result of it pricing as a "normal" round-trip fare rather than end-on-end of multiple fares. It is backwards from what logic would suggest.
http://www.united.com/web/en-US/cont...omerfirst.aspx
Advise about lowest available fares
On our website, at our ticket counters and city ticket offices, or when customers call United Reservations to inquire about a fare or reservation, we will tell customers that the lowest fare we offer may be available through one of our other sales channels, if that is the case.
Since airlines offered the Customer Commitment elements in 1999 to forestall legislative requirements, this looks DOT-complaint worthy to me.
http://www.oig.dot.gov/sites/dot/fil.../av2001020.pdf
#13
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 8,634
Where's the windfall for a customer? UA is actively charging more than it should in most cases. How is that in favor of the consumer?? If they say they are offering the cheapest fare and they are not that is hardly creating a windfall. Moreover, the cheaper fare is as a result of it pricing as a "normal" round-trip fare rather than end-on-end of multiple fares. It is backwards from what logic would suggest.
I would agree if the pricing were different for different flights. I get that. Charge me more if I want the more efficient flight by fewer/shorter connections. But if the exact same itinerary can have multiple different prices that's not at all reasonable. This is the airline screwing passengers.
I would agree if the pricing were different for different flights. I get that. Charge me more if I want the more efficient flight by fewer/shorter connections. But if the exact same itinerary can have multiple different prices that's not at all reasonable. This is the airline screwing passengers.
#14
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Gold-MM, AA Gold-MM, F9-Silver, Hyatt Something, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,392
Perhaps the most shocking thing to me is that there is one blogger who a.) still practices investigative journalism, b.) posts about it on FT! ^
#15
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,424
It's arguably deceptive if you take into account UA's "guarantee" that you will get its lowest available fare booking on .com:
When it comes to finding the lowest United® fare online, we guarantee you will find it on united.com.
What they don't disclose is that their booking engine will not actually show find you the lowest available fare for a connecting route.
When it comes to finding the lowest United® fare online, we guarantee you will find it on united.com.
What they don't disclose is that their booking engine will not actually show find you the lowest available fare for a connecting route.