Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

[Confirmed] SYD going UA 3 Cabin 777 in 2014 [and other 747 route changes]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Aug 17, 2013, 10:44 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: Bitterroot
Updates to Wiki as of 20 January 2014

Planned changes in aircraft by date and route:

SFO -- SYD: first 772 departs SFO 27 March; turns to 840 at SYD on 29 March

LAX -- SYD: first 772 departs LAX 29 March; turn off 840-29th.

NRT -- ORD: First 744 departs NRT 27 March (aircraft turn at ORD to PVG and FRA in succession the day following arrival from NRT)
ORD -- NRT: First 744 departs ORD 31 March

ORD -- PVG: First 744 departs ORD 28 March
PVG -- ORD: First 744 departs PVG 29 March

ORD -- FRA: First 744 departs ORD 29 March
FRA -- ORD: First 744 departs FRA 30 March

NRT -- SFO: 852 to operate with 772 27 March through 31 March inclusive (772 coming out of rotation)

Or, you can just go look at the good work here (note that info posted above differs from AIRLINEROUTE info dated 4 January 2014 and before):

http://airlineroute.net/2013/08/17/ua-s14update1/

Or, straight to the source if you want to do your own research:

http://www.oag.com/Global
Print Wikipost

[Confirmed] SYD going UA 3 Cabin 777 in 2014 [and other 747 route changes]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2013, 2:04 pm
  #331  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,909
Originally Posted by ORDnHKG
PMUA 772 had been using on ORD-HKG since the end of March, ORD-HKG is longer than both SFO-SYD and LAX-SYD, so you know if it can work or not.
What's the difference in cargo capacity of 777 vs 747? Always thought they kept the 747 on this route for the extra cargo capacity which is where they make the real money.
Baze is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 2:10 pm
  #332  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,814
Originally Posted by Baze
What's the difference in cargo capacity of 777 vs 747? Always thought they kept the 747 on this route for the extra cargo capacity which is where they make the real money.
Seems about the same:

http://www.boeing.com/boeing/commerc...0er_prod.page?

747-400ER
Cargo: 5,599 cu ft (158.6 cu m) or 4,837 cu ft (137 cu m)*
* These volumes are reduced relative to the 747-400 due to the addition of one body fuel tank, basic on the -400ER, in the forward lower cargo hold.

http://www.boeing.com/boeing/commerc...00product.page

777-200
Cargo: Total volume 5,330 cu ft (151 cu m).
edcho is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 2:13 pm
  #333  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,909
Originally Posted by edcho
Seems about the same:

http://www.boeing.com/boeing/commerc...0er_prod.page?

747-400ER
Cargo: 5,599 cu ft (158.6 cu m) or 4,837 cu ft (137 cu m)*
* These volumes are reduced relative to the 747-400 due to the addition of one body fuel tank, basic on the -400ER, in the forward lower cargo hold.

http://www.boeing.com/boeing/commerc...00product.page

777-200
Cargo: Total volume 5,330 cu ft (151 cu m).
Thanks
Baze is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 2:49 pm
  #334  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: Hyatt GLOB, Marriott Lifetime PLT, UA 1K 1MM.
Posts: 1,728
Originally Posted by ORDnHKG
PMUA 772 had been using on ORD-HKG since the end of March, ORD-HKG is longer than both SFO-SYD and LAX-SYD, so you know if it can work or not.
LAX-SYD actually isn't that far. clocks in at 7,487. i actually remember in inception they were talking about where to plan their heist, and they said LA to sydney was the longest flight in the world. i had recently flown EWR-HKG when i first saw that movie and thought, "i could have sworn it was longer..."

EWR-HKG run 8060mi, 15:50. even in BF it felt long as heck, i'd imagine economy was painful. also if i remember right, SQ used to run a non-stop SIN-JFK which sounds like a crazy long flight.

i'm actually kind of bummed that they're going with the 777 to SYD. i do like the 777 as a plane, but the inner child in me was really hoping that they would replace the 744's with 748's. economics, load, etc. i get it, but i still think it would have been cooler to use the 748. big planes might not make economic sense, but i think they're more fun. it actually makes me sad in general to see the low adoption rate that plane is getting overall.
bob_the_d is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 3:03 pm
  #335  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,961
Originally Posted by bob_the_d
i'm actually kind of bummed that they're going with the 777 to SYD. i do like the 777 as a plane, but the inner child in me was really hoping that they would replace the 744's with 748's.
Wouldn't they have to buy some, first?
DaviddesJ is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 3:26 pm
  #336  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,814
Originally Posted by bob_the_d
LAX-SYD actually isn't that far. clocks in at 7,487. i actually remember in inception they were talking about where to plan their heist, and they said LA to sydney was the longest flight in the world. i had recently flown EWR-HKG when i first saw that movie and thought, "i could have sworn it was longer..."

EWR-HKG run 8060mi, 15:50. even in BF it felt long as heck, i'd imagine economy was painful. also if i remember right, SQ used to run a non-stop SIN-JFK which sounds like a crazy long flight.

i'm actually kind of bummed that they're going with the 777 to SYD. i do like the 777 as a plane, but the inner child in me was really hoping that they would replace the 744's with 748's. economics, load, etc. i get it, but i still think it would have been cooler to use the 748. big planes might not make economic sense, but i think they're more fun. it actually makes me sad in general to see the low adoption rate that plane is getting overall.
I believe it is EWR-SIN (all business class plane):

http://www.usatoday.com/story/todayi...light/1653833/

Clocks in at 9,525 miles (8,277 nautical miles). I believe it is still running actually. The stop date appears to be November 24, 2013.
edcho is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 3:29 pm
  #337  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by DaviddesJ
Wouldn't they have to buy some, first?
Is Lufthansa still the only one who has taken this plunge?
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 3:30 pm
  #338  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 1,498
Originally Posted by planeluvr
We don't use UA metal to fly to SYD.
What would you recommend using during OZ blackout periods then? Going late May 2014, only thing available was AC YVR-SYD with a long layover. Would rather just fly UA F/J non-stop. ANA unlikely to open up two award seats.
iceman77_7 is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 3:35 pm
  #339  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,814
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
Is Lufthansa still the only one who has taken this plunge?
KE (5) and CA (5) placed orders.

The freighter version seems much more popular though.
edcho is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 3:43 pm
  #340  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 133
Originally Posted by nova08
Originally Posted by ORDnHKG
I can't understand why ORD-NRT is back to a 744 but not ORD-HKG.

NH will have 2x 77W daily for ORD-NRT starting Septmeber, so it is totally unnecessary for UA to add more capacity for the route.
You could say the same about ORD-FRA. UA will have 2 daily 1 on the 744 and LH will have 2 daily 744s

Apparently UA feels that the extra seats are needed.
Thank the JVs with LH and ANA for this decision
MileCards is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 4:17 pm
  #341  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: SJC
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 609
LAX-SYD barely cracks the top 30 for longest scheduled non-stop flights. Longer UA routes are EWR-HKG, EWR-BOM, and ORD-HKG.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-sto...ongest_flights
BayAreaPilot is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 4:29 pm
  #342  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: United Plat
Posts: 499
How many 747s are returning to ORD?

Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
I mean the 747s will fly routes that do a W pattern ie SFO - FRA - ORD - NRT - SFO etc. Not the passengers.
I am curious how the W pattern works. Here is the schedule from United.com on 4/16/2014:

UA 835 departing ORD at 10:55 for PVG
UA 881 departing ORD at 13:20 for NRT
UA 907 departing ORD at 18:25 for FRA

UA 882 from NRT, arriving ORD at 14:30
UA 906 from FRA, arriving ORD at 14:55
UA 836 from PVG, arriving ORD at 16:05

Looks like only UA 907 can use the plane coming back from FRA on the same day. UA 835 and 881 are not able to wait for planes from NRT or PVG. Can I say on a single day, we will see 5 individual 747s in and out of ORD?

How many 747s does United need to operate these 3 routes?
sfo3388 is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 4:37 pm
  #343  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: EWR
Programs: United Mileage Plus Premier Silver
Posts: 223
Is EWR capable of 744's?

Would UA ever place a 744 on any route out of EWR?

EWR has seen some nice upgrades in the EWR-FRA market recently with a sUA 772! Wonder how long that will stick, as it seems to switch back to a 764 and then to a 763 and then back to a 772 in early spring.

Also when was the last time ORD-FRA saw the 744?
daganderson is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 7:40 pm
  #344  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: AA PP, UA 1K/MM, WoH Globalist, HH Gold
Posts: 1,196
Originally Posted by daganderson
Would UA ever place a 744 on any route out of EWR?

EWR has seen some nice upgrades in the EWR-FRA market recently with a sUA 772! Wonder how long that will stick, as it seems to switch back to a 764 and then to a 763 and then back to a 772 in early spring.

Also when was the last time ORD-FRA saw the 744?
ORD-FRA had a 744 back in the Summer of 2011.

ORD-LHR was also a 744 back in the Summer of 2012.

Originally Posted by Baze
You are free to fly another airline that better suits your needs.
Thanks for the advice

But since it has been confirmed that they are using a sUA 777, your recommendation is better suited for the person that had issues with a sUA 777: colpuck.

Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Aug 17, 2013 at 7:56 pm Reason: multi-quote should be used
Infinite1K is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2013, 7:52 pm
  #345  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Programs: UA,DL
Posts: 279
Well look like PVG won't see any 772s next year.

Last edited by deltaflyer08; Aug 17, 2013 at 8:03 pm
deltaflyer08 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.