Return of the wide-body jet, SFO-ORD and ORD-SFO?
#18
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: if it's Thursday, this must be Belgium
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 6,484
#19
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: DL DM, AS MVP 100K, Amtrak peon, Colbert Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 4,534
#21
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,447
And UA did this, added a tag as (1) they had unused time on the AC, or (2) were rotating planes so they were in KSFO where UAs main maintenance base was.
Adding a domestic tag using an international aircraft is very economical if you can fill the plane. The CASM using a 772 or 763 is better than flying two (or three) A320/319/737s. I think after a while the CO folks looked around, someone said "why are we running 3 narrow bodies at the same time?" and actually figured out that what UA was doing made sense for their network, fleet, and maintenance locations.
As I said, sometimes domestic widebody flying is worth it, for a panoply of reasons, other times it may not be.
Last edited by EWR764; Jun 21, 2013 at 11:43 am