Misconnex due customs/immigration and tight connect: Who pays taxi from IAD to DCA?
#31
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,015
"We recently misconnected at IAD coming in from Asia. All segments were on UA and were on one single ticket. No UA flights were delayed.
We misconnected due to slow customs/immigration, and subsequently were protected on a flight, 6 hours later, ex-DCA, and had to fork out $70 for the taxi transfer between 2 airports."
Has the story changed somewhere?
#32
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Thanks all for the feedback. I was just expecting to learn from this experience.
There were no other options out of IAD on the same day. Overnighting would have cost a hotel room at my expense. The connection time was 1:21h, and even though I said there were no delays, the inbound flight certainly arrived later than scheduled thus reducing the connection time.
There were no other options out of IAD on the same day. Overnighting would have cost a hotel room at my expense. The connection time was 1:21h, and even though I said there were no delays, the inbound flight certainly arrived later than scheduled thus reducing the connection time.
#33
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,290
?
"We recently misconnected at IAD coming in from Asia. All segments were on UA and were on one single ticket. No UA flights were delayed.
We misconnected due to slow customs/immigration, and subsequently were protected on a flight, 6 hours later, ex-DCA, and had to fork out $70 for the taxi transfer between 2 airports."
Has the story changed somewhere?
"We recently misconnected at IAD coming in from Asia. All segments were on UA and were on one single ticket. No UA flights were delayed.
We misconnected due to slow customs/immigration, and subsequently were protected on a flight, 6 hours later, ex-DCA, and had to fork out $70 for the taxi transfer between 2 airports."
Has the story changed somewhere?
#34
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Between SFO and SJC
Programs: UA 1K-MM
Posts: 1,406
Any international connection less than 2 hours if you have checked luggage is a BIG risk.
And as noted above, if you are GE and the kiosks are down, you do get to use the crew line. Take advantage of all your benefits!
#35
Formerly known as CollegeFlyer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JRA
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA PLT, Hyatt Diamond, Marriott Gold, Hertz 5*
Posts: 6,716
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,015
Some of you are confused - Minimum connection times do not account for IRROPS. It's a connection time - from when you leave the jetway of one aircraft until you board the next, allowing time for terminal transfers, security clearances, CIQ, etc. It's based on expected arrivals/departures. If UA has a flight that's constantly late, then it needs to adjust the length of flight, not change MCT. That would have possibly made your connection invalid. If you want to make MCT include late arrivals, etc, let's just allow 24 hours or so as a MCT, unless you're at a infrequent service int'l airport and make it 48...
Last edited by IAH-OIL-TRASH; Apr 19, 2013 at 11:22 am Reason: INIMU
#37
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,691
Also, in these circumstances, and assuming that UA's published connection times were met, it would be reasonable for UA to pay for the cab - when booking a flight with several stops all on UA, a passenger is entitled to assume that UA has the expertise and the ability to perform that service.
Whatever, it should not be up to the passenger to "choose" or "accept" a tight connection. Not knowing IAD, how would one know what a "tight" connection is. Some airports are so much easier to connect through and 1:21h would be a breeze. IAD is totally a mess and my feeling is UA should have known, and perhaps increased the connection time there if misconnects were rampant. And no, we weren't the only ones who misconnected on that flight.
Thanks for that comment. After the fact, I relooked the connection of 1:21h. With gates closing 10min prior, and inbound taxi/disembarking taking at least 15min, the true connection time, including running across more than 20 gates, was south of 60mins. The airline, with whatever limited info it has, should have concluded that an international connection would take more time than that.
Thanks for this comment. As you can see, I choose to stay objective and to ignore other comments that suggest that the traveler should know what a reasonable connection is, or should know enough to "not like" a "tight" connection. The onus should not be on the pax to know what's tight or not - not everybody lives out of a suitcase - that responsibility falls on the airline within its definition of connection legality. The pax purchased something offered by the airline, so should have a reasonable expectation to make his connections.
My experience transiting IAD is that GE does not help. Yes, you bypass the long immigration lines, but baggage claim, even if transiting, takes longer than the wait in the customs lines.
Any international connection less than 2 hours if you have checked luggage is a BIG risk.
Any international connection less than 2 hours if you have checked luggage is a BIG risk.
#38
Join Date: May 2008
Location: WAS
Programs: AA Ex Plt
Posts: 1,630
I use GE at IAD all the time and zip right on through. I almost never check bags so I can't comment on that wait time, but a GE with no bags is in and out at IAD.
As an aside, wait until folks start counting on the Silver line to get home or into the District but arrive after Metro operations have closed for the night - that ain't going to be fun
Cheers -
As an aside, wait until folks start counting on the Silver line to get home or into the District but arrive after Metro operations have closed for the night - that ain't going to be fun
Cheers -
#39
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
If the situation at the border looks indefinite, UA will probably adjust their MCT for int'l connections. You want to blame someone? Blame Congress for not providing the money for the needed services. UA didn't cause the delay at CIQ. Send your representative the cab bill. Oops, OP is Canadian...
5.50 Customs
7.00 Immigration
5.00 APHIS
does anything think it really costs anything close to $17.50 to process a marginal passenger?
My experience transiting IAD is that GE does not help. Yes, you bypass the long immigration lines, but baggage claim, even if transiting, takes longer than the wait in the customs lines.
#40
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
1. UA's obligation was to rebook OP.
2. OP chose to accept the xDCA flight rather than overnight at IAD. That's a reasonable decision and I would almost certainly have made the same decision. But, nonetheless, it's a choice and OP made it.
3. Had OP asked, UA might have issued a voucher, but he didn't.
4. OP can certainly submit the receipt, but there's nothing in the COC which would require UA to reimburse when it didn't agree to pay upfront. If OP gets a couple of miles tossed his way, that would be about it.
On the subject of MCT's, there are people who book short connections, people who want more time and people who don't know what they need. The first two are certainly informed decisions. There's no shame in being like OP -- an traveler who doesn't know IAD -- but that's what a good TA does for you.
I don't want UA deciding for me what I want. While the connection was tight, it's the kind of thing I would have tried for, particularly if there were no later connections.
2. OP chose to accept the xDCA flight rather than overnight at IAD. That's a reasonable decision and I would almost certainly have made the same decision. But, nonetheless, it's a choice and OP made it.
3. Had OP asked, UA might have issued a voucher, but he didn't.
4. OP can certainly submit the receipt, but there's nothing in the COC which would require UA to reimburse when it didn't agree to pay upfront. If OP gets a couple of miles tossed his way, that would be about it.
On the subject of MCT's, there are people who book short connections, people who want more time and people who don't know what they need. The first two are certainly informed decisions. There's no shame in being like OP -- an traveler who doesn't know IAD -- but that's what a good TA does for you.
I don't want UA deciding for me what I want. While the connection was tight, it's the kind of thing I would have tried for, particularly if there were no later connections.
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,015
The fees do not go directly to the agencies they are intended for. UA does not write a check to Homeland Security. Congress allocates budgets.
#42
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 34
I don't think there is a clear policy, so it's hard to say what you could have gotten if you had asked when you were booked a new connection (unless someone else has personal experience on this). It doesn't hurt to contact CS, maybe you will get a credit for a future flight.
Look at the extreme scenario, what if the plane was stuck on the tarmac upon arrival for 90 minutes? Who is at fault here? In my opinion, I take the risk if I book a flight with a tight connection, but I will always lean on the airline to see what can be done to fix the issue at no additional expense to myself. In that sense, it doesn't really matter who is at fault, it's more about United's willingness to compensate you.
Personally, I would be more bummed at the wasted 6 hours than the $70.
Look at the extreme scenario, what if the plane was stuck on the tarmac upon arrival for 90 minutes? Who is at fault here? In my opinion, I take the risk if I book a flight with a tight connection, but I will always lean on the airline to see what can be done to fix the issue at no additional expense to myself. In that sense, it doesn't really matter who is at fault, it's more about United's willingness to compensate you.
Personally, I would be more bummed at the wasted 6 hours than the $70.
#43
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton ♦ , Hyatt Carbonado, Wyndham ♦, Marriott PE, "Stinking Bum" elsewhere.
Posts: 4,993
At IAH a few weeks ago, even the GE people were in the immigration line for over 30 minutes. The regular lines were over an hour. I agree with what others have said, don't take any international connection under 2 hours into the US unless you can afford to miss your connecting flight. This is not Hong Kong, after all, with plenty of efficient and competent immigration agents. I have done many 45 minute connections where I had to go through immigration and recheck my bags in HKG, and never had a problem.
There is just no way that you can blame the airline for the competence/proficiency of a government agency!
There is just no way that you can blame the airline for the competence/proficiency of a government agency!
#44
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EWR, PHL
Programs: UA1k 3MM, AA Plt, peasant on everybody else, elite something or other at a bunch of hotels.
Posts: 4,637
At IAH a few weeks ago, even the GE people were in the immigration line for over 30 minutes. The regular lines were over an hour. I agree with what others have said, don't take any international connection under 2 hours into the US unless you can afford to miss your connecting flight. This is not Hong Kong, after all, with plenty of efficient and competent immigration agents. I have done many 45 minute connections where I had to go through immigration and recheck my bags in HKG, and never had a problem.
#45
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,187
With six hours why would you ever take a taxi? Even if OP wasn't familiar with local public transit, Super Shuttle (for which no reservations are needed) would have done the transfer in plenty of time for only $29.00.