Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UA reports highest increase in revenue per passenger mile flown in March

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UA reports highest increase in revenue per passenger mile flown in March

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2013, 1:41 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
UA reports highest increase in revenue per passenger mile flown in March

United Airlines reported that its passenger revenue per passenger mile flown, or unit revenues, increased 6.5 percent to 7.5 percent in March – by far the best performance reported by a U.S. airline

Here’s what its competitors have reported for their March unit revenues.

Delta Air Lines Up 2%
American Airlines Up 0.3%
Southwest Airlines Flat
US Airways Flat
Allegiant Air Down 0.7% to 1.1%


http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/2...d-growth.html/
HNLbasedFlyer is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 2:23 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ASE
Programs: UA 1MM, AA1MM PLTPRO, Hertz PC, National EXC, Hyatt Explorist, Hilton/Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 3,357
You are, perhaps forgetting, that perhaps the reason the PRASM rose so much is because beginning March 03, 2012, things went to Heck for UA after switching to SHARES. I'd fully expect (and so should the shareholders) to see PRASM rise year-over-year. Remember, UA reduced schedules in 2012 due to the switch, and things still fell apart.
UAPremierGuy is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 2:40 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
I'm not forgetting anything - direct quotes from the article.
HNLbasedFlyer is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 5:40 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,166
I suppose you could also say "UA reports a dramatic increase in on-time and completion rates vs. last March!"

A pointless comparison
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 6:03 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
So, you don't think this is positive news?

What will it take for you to acknowledge a positive trend?

I do agree that the baseline is low, but then 1 year later we should expect these type of dramatic improvements if UA is trending in the right direction, correct?
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 6:37 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,814
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
So, you don't think this is positive news?

What will it take for you to acknowledge a positive trend?

I do agree that the baseline is low, but then 1 year later we should expect these type of dramatic improvements if UA is trending in the right direction, correct?
While I take it as positive news, they've been decreasing capacity for the past year so I'd be shocked if they didn't increase in PRASM since last March.
edcho is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 6:51 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: DL Platinum, AA Lifetime Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Radisson Premium
Posts: 6,638
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_1_3 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B329 Safari/8536.25)

Capacity cuts have been so large that this really means nothing
demkr is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 7:12 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by edcho
While I take it as positive news, they've been decreasing capacity for the past year so I'd be shocked if they didn't increase in PRASM since last March.
Caveats and qualifications are everywhere...

But, something has to be going right here, correct?

Originally Posted by demkr
Capacity cuts have been so large that this really means nothing
Nothing? Nothing at all?

Every little nit and pick that is negative quickly becomes a 50 post thread here on FT deriding the airline.

But, a very large increase in passenger revenue per mile means nothing?

I am not trying to claim that this is some watershed event and UA is now out of the woods. There is a lot of work still to be done.

But characterizing this news as 'nothing' seems misguided to me.
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 7:15 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,166
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
Caveats and qualifications are everywhere...

But, something has to be going right here, correct?
You realize March '12 is probably going to be the best month to comp against in a decade, right?

I think the Q1 results will be a bit more telling, and not in a good way.
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 7:19 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: AA LT Plat, UA 1k/1mm+, National EE, IC Plat, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 2,605
Originally Posted by demkr
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_1_3 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B329 Safari/8536.25)

Capacity cuts have been so large that this really means nothing
+1. At my home airport AUS, several of the AUS-EWR nonstops will be flown on E170s going forward and much of the AUS-IAH flights which were all 737 service on pmCO for the last decade are now on E145/E145/CRJ700 (and even some Q400). It's getting hard to fly UA out of AUS without flying a significant portion of a trip on regionals. Ludicrous. Capacity is way down.

In the meantime, AA zeroes out practically every flight in and out of AUS every time I fly (usually Tue and Thu but even this coming Sat). All on MD80s with far more service frequencies. UA is quite literally handing the AUS market to AA and SWA.
AAExPlat is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 7:25 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
You realize March '12 is probably going to be the best month to comp against in a decade, right?

I think the Q1 results will be a bit more telling, and not in a good way.
Fair enough... and Q2, and Q3, and this entire fiscal year and next fiscal year, etc. All will be telling.

Still, characterizing this uptick as 'no news' is just a little hypocritical in my opinion.
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 7:59 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
Fair enough... and Q2, and Q3, and this entire fiscal year and next fiscal year, etc. All will be telling.

Still, characterizing this uptick as 'no news' is just a little hypocritical in my opinion.
No less hypocrytical than UA's attempt to use a year over year comparison with one of the worst months in airline history as fodder for creating spin that tries to make it look like they have done a great job.
FlyWorld is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 8:05 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K MM, Marriott Life Plat, various others of little note
Posts: 2,763
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
So, you don't think this is positive news?

What will it take for you to acknowledge a positive trend?

I do agree that the baseline is low, but then 1 year later we should expect these type of dramatic improvements if UA is trending in the right direction, correct?
Sure it's a positive trend, but last march was so bad that if they didn't show a positive trend from then it would be an epic failure. The point is that you would fully expect a dramatic increase, any mediocre results in March would be a dramatic increase from last March. The comparison with other airlines is meaningless because they did not implode last march.
Boghopper is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 8:07 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by mitchmu
No less hypocrytical than UA's attempt to use a year over year comparison with one of the worst months in airline history as fodder for creating spin that tries to make it look like they have done a great job.
So, are you saying that by achieving this large increase, UA management has done a bad job?

Now we are really entering some parallel reality...

Originally Posted by Boghopper
Sure it's a positive trend, but last march was so bad that if they didn't show a positive trend from then it would be an epic failure. The point is that you would fully expect a dramatic increase, any mediocre results in March would be a dramatic increase from last March. The comparison with other airlines is meaningless because they did not implode last march.
So, in your opinion, these results fall somewhere between "epic failure' and "good job"?
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2013, 8:16 am
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Programs: UA PP, AA, DL, BA, CX, SPG, HHonors
Posts: 2,002
Originally Posted by AAExPlat
+1. At my home airport AUS, several of the AUS-EWR nonstops will be flown on E170s going forward and much of the AUS-IAH flights which were all 737 service on pmCO for the last decade are now on E145/E145/CRJ700 (and even some Q400). It's getting hard to fly UA out of AUS without flying a significant portion of a trip on regionals. Ludicrous. Capacity is way down.

In the meantime, AA zeroes out practically every flight in and out of AUS every time I fly (usually Tue and Thu but even this coming Sat). All on MD80s with far more service frequencies. UA is quite literally handing the AUS market to AA and SWA.
You actually prefer a 30-year-old MD80 that probably needs a 3rd D-check over a relatively new CRJ700 ?
787fan is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.