RJ 145 maximum carry-on size to avoid gate check
#46
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1K (MM), DL, AA, AS, HHonors, SPG, Kimpton, Hyatt, IC PC, Marriott Titanium (LT PLT), Hertz PC
Posts: 7,231
Please hear me out. :-)
First of all it is my intention to get every single customer to their destination, with their bag at the time we said we would. It is also my intention to make the entire process as pleasant as possible. I am what you call an "Express Jet lifer" and happy customers equals job security and makes my day easier.
Here is the full definition of a "carry-on bag" according to chapter 8 page 14 of my inflight manual:
"Defined as a roll-aboard bag, suitcase or other type of bag. Carry-on bags must not exceed 45 linear inches (H+W+L) or 40 pounds, or be of a size and shape which does not allow for proper aircraft stowage." (Remember that carry on bags are not permitted in the cabin)
When it says any other type of bag I realize that is a huge grey area. So I'm going to answer your question based on my understanding of the definition. Please remember this is just my opinion. Yes, your briefcase with wheels can be brought into the cabin. I see it as a briefcase and not a suit case. The roller bags would be similar in size to my crew bag and your brief case would be similar in size to my tote bag. My roller bag is considered a carry on and my tote is considered a personal item.
I apologize for all the frustration anyone may have felt and hope that my input is helpful.
First of all it is my intention to get every single customer to their destination, with their bag at the time we said we would. It is also my intention to make the entire process as pleasant as possible. I am what you call an "Express Jet lifer" and happy customers equals job security and makes my day easier.
Here is the full definition of a "carry-on bag" according to chapter 8 page 14 of my inflight manual:
"Defined as a roll-aboard bag, suitcase or other type of bag. Carry-on bags must not exceed 45 linear inches (H+W+L) or 40 pounds, or be of a size and shape which does not allow for proper aircraft stowage." (Remember that carry on bags are not permitted in the cabin)
When it says any other type of bag I realize that is a huge grey area. So I'm going to answer your question based on my understanding of the definition. Please remember this is just my opinion. Yes, your briefcase with wheels can be brought into the cabin. I see it as a briefcase and not a suit case. The roller bags would be similar in size to my crew bag and your brief case would be similar in size to my tote bag. My roller bag is considered a carry on and my tote is considered a personal item.
I apologize for all the frustration anyone may have felt and hope that my input is helpful.
I typically travel with one carry-on (Patagonia MLC). It fits in the overhead. If necessary, it fits (barely) under my seat. By definition, it is almost exactly the size of the bag sizer available at the gate (which almost has to make it a carry-on). By your definition it should be viewed as not allowed into the cabin. Having said that, I often wear it as a backpack and carry my laptop in it, so maybe I can make the case that it's my laptop bag backpack ? I've had a couple of GAs try to tag it, but I've never gate checked it (because it always fits in the overhead!).
I do get frustrated when I'm told I have to check it, but I try to internalize that frustration, smile, nod, and proceed to slip the tag into my pocket (because the bag easily fits in the overhead!). Never had a problem once on board.
I also can't stand the "everyone wait on board because the bags aren't out yet" rule that's often imposed. I don't have a bag to wait for, and waiting onboard for an extra 5 minutes is going to make me miss my connection/bus/club time. Why do I have to wait onboard when the engines are powered off, the door is open and it is safe to deplane?
#47
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 133
According to the United RGCOM, all bags are to be scanned on and off an aircraft so they can do weight and balance in Unimatic. Just because you don't see them scan it at the beltloader doesn't mean it isn't done. At our station, sometimes we do it at the gate (if we're short workers), in the jetbridge (when we have enough people), or planeside at the beltloader (if I've got a newbie ramp crew that doesn't know what the heck their doing and forget or we have more regular bags to scan.)
All bags are to be scanned off a flight too, typically inside the bins on the 145s. It raises red flags if more bags are scanned off than on a flight.
All bags are to be scanned off a flight too, typically inside the bins on the 145s. It raises red flags if more bags are scanned off than on a flight.
#48
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 48
Here is some food for thought:
Fact: We are using a different weight and balance system then before.
Fact: The previous system accounted for "carry on luggage" in the cabin. The number of bags and their location throughout the cabin was added to the weight and balance.
Fact: With the new system we no longer count the "carry on bags" in the cabin and thus their weight is not added to the final weight and balance numbers the pilots use.
Speculation: I have lots if it lol. However I feel it will devalue the integrity of my post.
Fact: We are using a different weight and balance system then before.
Fact: The previous system accounted for "carry on luggage" in the cabin. The number of bags and their location throughout the cabin was added to the weight and balance.
Fact: With the new system we no longer count the "carry on bags" in the cabin and thus their weight is not added to the final weight and balance numbers the pilots use.
Speculation: I have lots if it lol. However I feel it will devalue the integrity of my post.
#49
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Programs: UA 1k, Hertz Pres, Avis Pres, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 244
Fact: The previous system accounted for "carry on luggage" in the cabin. The number of bags and their location throughout the cabin was added to the weight and balance.
Fact: With the new system we no longer count the "carry on bags" in the cabin and thus their weight is not added to the final weight and balance numbers the pilots use.
Fact: With the new system we no longer count the "carry on bags" in the cabin and thus their weight is not added to the final weight and balance numbers the pilots use.
#50
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 75
This is indeed coming from the Feds. Some FAs are just stricter than others on enforcement. A roll aboard bag is supposed to be gate checked. Apparently the FAA audited ExpressJet and fined them a few months back for allowing them on board thus the policy change.
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
I believe the deal here is that every airline has their own carry on rules, which are submitted to the FAA. And the FAA enforces those rules. The carry on rules then influence weight and balance checks. So that's why the FAA cares.
The part about whether the personal item can have wheels or not seems ambiguous.
The part about whether the personal item can have wheels or not seems ambiguous.
#53
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: BOS
Programs: MP,MR Silver,Avis
Posts: 848
So, there's nothing published anywhere that we can see that says that rollaboards have to be checked, or that bags over a certain size have to be checked, so we're at the mercy of the airport staff. Wonderful.
#54
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 75
We just got a bulletin about results of the recent FAA audit - here is the verbiage regarding the findings on the bags:
Baggage Policy
It was documented that Flight Attendants were not following the “No Carry On” policy by allowing items larger than personal items (i.e., large suitcases/rollaboard bags) in the cabin on the EMB135/145 and CRJ200.
The CRJ-200, EMB-135 and EMB-145 aircraft operate under a No Carry-On Bag
policy. Only carry-on items defined as personal items are permitted to be transported
in the aircraft cabin provided they can be properly stowed. Carry-on items defined as carry-on bags are not permitted to be transported in the passenger cabin. They must be planeside/gate claim-tagged and stowed in the cargo compartment. Refer to FAM 8–14.1 for the Company policy on Carry-On Baggage.
#56
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 75
I'm not sure to be honest. Not an FA either so I can't really say where the line is. I think it is intentionally vague in its language, so YMMV as to what the FA will allow. I've seen them overridden by the Captain and the item allowed on, but it is quite rare. If a Captain or First Officer writes up a Flight Attendant for being over zealous (which happens once in a while), there is some potential blowback involved.
#58
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Programs: UA MM 1K, AA MM Gold, Marriott LT Platinum
Posts: 3,235
Yes, from another forum:
We just got a bulletin about results of the recent FAA audit - here is the verbiage regarding the findings on the bags:
Baggage Policy
It was documented that Flight Attendants were not following the “No Carry On” policy by allowing items larger than personal items (i.e., large suitcases/rollaboard bags) in the cabin on the EMB135/145 and CRJ200.
The CRJ-200, EMB-135 and EMB-145 aircraft operate under a No Carry-On Bag
policy. Only carry-on items defined as personal items are permitted to be transported
in the aircraft cabin provided they can be properly stowed. Carry-on items defined as carry-on bags are not permitted to be transported in the passenger cabin. They must be planeside/gate claim-tagged and stowed in the cargo compartment. Refer to FAM 8–14.1 for the Company policy on Carry-On Baggage.
We just got a bulletin about results of the recent FAA audit - here is the verbiage regarding the findings on the bags:
Baggage Policy
It was documented that Flight Attendants were not following the “No Carry On” policy by allowing items larger than personal items (i.e., large suitcases/rollaboard bags) in the cabin on the EMB135/145 and CRJ200.
The CRJ-200, EMB-135 and EMB-145 aircraft operate under a No Carry-On Bag
policy. Only carry-on items defined as personal items are permitted to be transported
in the aircraft cabin provided they can be properly stowed. Carry-on items defined as carry-on bags are not permitted to be transported in the passenger cabin. They must be planeside/gate claim-tagged and stowed in the cargo compartment. Refer to FAM 8–14.1 for the Company policy on Carry-On Baggage.
#60
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1K (MM), DL, AA, AS, HHonors, SPG, Kimpton, Hyatt, IC PC, Marriott Titanium (LT PLT), Hertz PC
Posts: 7,231
Baggage Policy
It was documented that Flight Attendants were not following the “No Carry On” policy by allowing items larger than personal items (i.e., large suitcases/rollaboard bags) in the cabin on the EMB135/145 and CRJ200.
The CRJ-200, EMB-135 and EMB-145 aircraft operate under a No Carry-On Bag
policy. Only carry-on items defined as personal items are permitted to be transported
in the aircraft cabin provided they can be properly stowed. Carry-on items defined as carry-on bags are not permitted to be transported in the passenger cabin. They must be planeside/gate claim-tagged and stowed in the cargo compartment. Refer to FAM 8–14.1 for the Company policy on Carry-On Baggage.
It was documented that Flight Attendants were not following the “No Carry On” policy by allowing items larger than personal items (i.e., large suitcases/rollaboard bags) in the cabin on the EMB135/145 and CRJ200.
The CRJ-200, EMB-135 and EMB-145 aircraft operate under a No Carry-On Bag
policy. Only carry-on items defined as personal items are permitted to be transported
in the aircraft cabin provided they can be properly stowed. Carry-on items defined as carry-on bags are not permitted to be transported in the passenger cabin. They must be planeside/gate claim-tagged and stowed in the cargo compartment. Refer to FAM 8–14.1 for the Company policy on Carry-On Baggage.
Is my larger, computer-carrying, backpack-style bag that also holds all of my clothes and can be properly stowed in the overhead on any RJ considered a "carry-on" or a "personal item"?
If the former, then I should avoid flying the ERJs and CR2s -- if the latter, all is well.