Oxford Airport
Jun 10, 2016, 9:57 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MSN
Programs: AA, BAEC Gold
Posts: 3,928
Oxford Airport
This article may be of interest to some: http://www.oxfordtoday.ox.ac.uk/news...xfords-airport
"London Oxford Airport" the sixth busiest general aviation airport in the UK and its aspirations to have common carrier traffic.
"London Oxford Airport" the sixth busiest general aviation airport in the UK and its aspirations to have common carrier traffic.
Jun 11, 2016, 5:14 am
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: somewhere north of London, UK
Programs: HH Gold, BA Silver, Accor Silver
Posts: 15,245
Thanks for posting. I live about 20 mins from Oxford Airport and would love to see it develop some scheduled flights but I honestly can't see it being viable simply because Heathrow and Birmingham are just an hour away.
Jun 11, 2016, 9:54 am
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: somewhere north of London, UK
Programs: HH Gold, BA Silver, Accor Silver
Posts: 15,245
As I understand it they have managed some charter operations with a flight to Jersey running for a few summers. They tried Palma on I think a SAAB2000 but it was load constrained.
Jun 11, 2016, 11:16 am
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MSN
Programs: AA, BAEC Gold
Posts: 3,928
Well I have grown used to LHR, though I am usually connecting up to MAN, but I thought the story of the success of the general aviation side coupled with the difficulty of making common carrier aviation work was interesting. If AA would just have reasonable business class fares now that they have switched ORD-MAN to a 787 I would be happy.
Jun 12, 2016, 1:38 am
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,224
The normal route for airports like this is to develop a significant holiday charter business. People get used to using it and then some of the charters morph into scheduled. This will attract an LCC perhaps.
Jun 12, 2016, 2:38 am
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: somewhere north of London, UK
Programs: HH Gold, BA Silver, Accor Silver
Posts: 15,245
But the runway is even shorter than the one at LCY, which rules out the majority of charter operators. As I said, the PMI service they tried was load constrained.
Jun 12, 2016, 4:36 pm
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
They've tried scheduled services; including, I think, a whacky short-lived affair to Cambridge, competing with the X5 
. A young Walter Mitty was successful in raising the capital to start an Edinburgh service, but that lasted only a very short time.
I guess there's simply not the volume of passengers willing to pay the fares required to sustain routes operated by the aircraft types able to use Oxford.
My understanding is the "London" designation is self-branding.
. A young Walter Mitty was successful in raising the capital to start an Edinburgh service, but that lasted only a very short time.I guess there's simply not the volume of passengers willing to pay the fares required to sustain routes operated by the aircraft types able to use Oxford.
My understanding is the "London" designation is self-branding.
Jun 14, 2016, 3:02 am
#9
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 399
Certainly is self branding. The UK CAA and IATA recognise 6 airports as "London" - Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted, Luton, City, and Southend.
Put 'LON' as the three letter airport code in a flight search engine and you'll get flights to/from as many of the 6 as have services to the airport at the other end of the route.
If Oxford had scheduled flights, they wouldn't show up in searches for 'LON' as the airport is not officially recognised as serving London.
Put 'LON' as the three letter airport code in a flight search engine and you'll get flights to/from as many of the 6 as have services to the airport at the other end of the route.
If Oxford had scheduled flights, they wouldn't show up in searches for 'LON' as the airport is not officially recognised as serving London.
Jun 14, 2016, 7:41 am
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MSN
Programs: AA, BAEC Gold
Posts: 3,928
Certainly is self branding. The UK CAA and IATA recognise 6 airports as "London" - Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted, Luton, City, and Southend.
Put 'LON' as the three letter airport code in a flight search engine and you'll get flights to/from as many of the 6 as have services to the airport at the other end of the route.
If Oxford had scheduled flights, they wouldn't show up in searches for 'LON' as the airport is not officially recognised as serving London.
Put 'LON' as the three letter airport code in a flight search engine and you'll get flights to/from as many of the 6 as have services to the airport at the other end of the route.
If Oxford had scheduled flights, they wouldn't show up in searches for 'LON' as the airport is not officially recognised as serving London.
Jun 14, 2016, 8:34 am
#11
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 399
And Birmingham Airport has its own station linked to the airport with 5 trains an hour to Euston (more in the peak periods), 3 of which take just 10 minutes longer than those from Oxford Parkway, which is more than made up by the shuttle train directly from the airport to the station instead of an 8 mile road transfer. Add a full-length runway - being extended to take even bigger intercontinental planes, and fully equipped terminals, and there is a much better candidate for the 7th London Airport than Oxford.
Jun 15, 2016, 3:30 am
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
But they have branded it as London Oxford, although official designation is missing: I'm guessing the branding is to make the airport more visible to Netjets et al and private operators. Luton is getting chocka so someday there'll be movement up the M1 to J13 and Cranfield, or across to Kidlington.
Jun 15, 2016, 7:57 am
#14
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MSN
Programs: AA, BAEC Gold
Posts: 3,928
But they have branded it as London Oxford, although official designation is missing: I'm guessing the branding is to make the airport more visible to Netjets et al and private operators. Luton is getting chocka so someday there'll be movement up the M1 to J13 and Cranfield, or across to Kidlington.
Jun 18, 2016, 12:43 pm
#15
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,945
The longer of the two runways at OXF is actually 50 m longer than the runway at LCY. However, you are right that it does result in restrictions.