Turkish 321 vs. EgyptAir 737-800 -- Transit and Comfort
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 109
Turkish 321 vs. EgyptAir 737-800 -- Transit and Comfort
I'm booking a flight from Cairo to Dulles next March, flying via Istanbul. I the choice of going on EgyptAir on a 737-800 and having 1:45 hours to make the connection, or I can fly on a Turkish 321 and have 2:45 hours to connect. I can't find reliable EgyptAir seating info, so I can't compare, but it looks as though Turkish in Economy on the 321 is quite small. Anyone have any experience.
Plus, any thoughts on the extra hour to connect? Tnx.
Plus, any thoughts on the extra hour to connect? Tnx.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
I'm booking a flight from Cairo to Dulles next March, flying via Istanbul. I the choice of going on EgyptAir on a 737-800 and having 1:45 hours to make the connection, or I can fly on a Turkish 321 and have 2:45 hours to connect. I can't find reliable EgyptAir seating info, so I can't compare, but it looks as though Turkish in Economy on the 321 is quite small. Anyone have any experience.
Plus, any thoughts on the extra hour to connect? Tnx.
Plus, any thoughts on the extra hour to connect? Tnx.
1:45H isn't a generous connection time; in fact it could be rather tight given IST congestion, flight delays and the security faff around flights to the US.
The last time I took the TK flight from CAI I missed my connection at IST (admittedly just one hour ten minutes). The airline came up trumps: with a little pressure they bought me a ticket on another carrier (after offering a hotel etc for a next-day departure) AND came up with an EU-type compensation payment. So there are probably advantages in making an "online" connection, even if the M`s service is a code-share.
I'd definitely take the TK flight.
P.S. I see you've added exactly the same post to other forums. That's a no-no.
Last edited by IAN-UK; May 24, 2017 at 4:25 am
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Barcelona, London, on a plane
Programs: BA Silver, TK E+, AA PP, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 13,033
Can't think of a single reason to fly MS instead of practically any other airline. (except maybe for some random F mileage run)
And given the security nightmare, take the extra connection time in IST, unless you fancy an overnight layover in IST...
And given the security nightmare, take the extra connection time in IST, unless you fancy an overnight layover in IST...
#5
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: TK*G (E+), IHG Plat Ambassador
Posts: 7,884
For the record: aren't TK flights to/from Egypt dry, either?
http://wildabouttravel.boardingarea....ks-on-turkish/
http://wildabouttravel.boardingarea....ks-on-turkish/
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
For the record: aren't TK flights to/from Egypt dry, either?
http://wildabouttravel.boardingarea....ks-on-turkish/
http://wildabouttravel.boardingarea....ks-on-turkish/
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Barcelona, London, on a plane
Programs: BA Silver, TK E+, AA PP, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 13,033
#10
Join Date: May 2006
Location: MYF/CMA/SAN/YYZ/YKF
Programs: COdbaUA 1K MM, AA EXP, Bonbon Gold, GHA Titanium, Hertz PC, NEXUS and GE
Posts: 5,837
I can think of no situation where I would fly MS over TK, in any class.
Egyptair isn't dry due to government policy, but a foolish airline one.
For the record: aren't TK flights to/from Egypt dry, either?
http://wildabouttravel.boardingarea....ks-on-turkish/
http://wildabouttravel.boardingarea....ks-on-turkish/
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
Separating government policy from that of a state-owned company is difficult: pointless in Egypt.
Just wondering - why do you believe it is a foolish policy?
Absence of alcohol on board is a USP attractive to many.
You might find it unattractive, but others care less if they miss out on an inflight drink, while many in the airline's home market and elsewhere in its network are relieved to be able to secure a place in an an alcohol-free environment.
Just wondering - why do you believe it is a foolish policy?
Absence of alcohol on board is a USP attractive to many.
You might find it unattractive, but others care less if they miss out on an inflight drink, while many in the airline's home market and elsewhere in its network are relieved to be able to secure a place in an an alcohol-free environment.