Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Dec 3, 07, 4:53 pm   #1636
KVS
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Planet Earth, Solar System
Programs: KVS Availability Tool
Posts: 6,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
My response is - why isn't it written to be platform-independent?
The use of a Mac is one's choice and I certainly respect that. I am willing to make reasonable accommodations in terms of compatibility (for example, an alternative keyboard shortcut was introduced to accommodate Mac users, who couldn't "right click").

Re-writing 15 000+ lines of code and taking a hit on decreased application performance from the use of "platform-independent" solutions? Sorry, but I would have to say no.

In any case, now that Apple had finally acknowledged the idiocy behind using a non-Intel processor architecture on consumer-grade machines, running a Win32 application on a modern Mac is easier than ever: http://kvs.unrealnetwork.com/Images/...elsDesktop.gif
__________________
«··········» [KVS Availability Tool: Main Thread]
KVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 07, 5:10 pm   #1637
TalkBoard Candidate/09
I Voted
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Near MSN
Programs: DL PM, SPG PLT, Marriott Lame Duck PLT
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by KVS View Post
The use of a Mac is one's choice and I certainly respect that. I am willing to make reasonable accommodations in terms of compatibility (for example, an alternative keyboard shortcut was introduced to accommodate Mac users, who couldn't "right click").

Re-writing 15 000+ lines of code and taking a hit on decreased application performance from the use of "platform-independent" solutions? Sorry, but I would have to say no.

In any case, now that Apple had finally acknowledged the idiocy behind using a non-Intel processor architecture on consumer-grade machines, running a Win32 application on a modern Mac is easier than ever: http://kvs.unrealnetwork.com/Images/...elsDesktop.gif
Please tell me how I can do so without purchasing a copy of Windows for a significant price?

Or, to rephrase, in an Internet world, why a client at all?

Edited to say: I'm not trying to turn this personal against your business. I believe I've purchased 2 full subscriptions at the PLT level now, matter of fact. I'm just saying that pointing Mac users to a virtualization option may not get quite the warm response you expect. Many users would say if they wanted to run Windows, they'd have bought a Windows machine.
__________________
This space for rent to the highest bidder. Enquire within.

Last edited by RichMSN; Dec 3, 07 at 5:21 pm.
RichMSN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 07, 5:47 pm   #1638
KVS
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Planet Earth, Solar System
Programs: KVS Availability Tool
Posts: 6,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Please tell me how I can do so without purchasing a copy of Windows for a significant price?
I think that this might be the wrong kind of forum for that .

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Or, to rephrase, in an Internet world, why a client at all?
Firstly, it's a performance issue -- no web-based solution will ever be as fast a well-written native [Win or Mac] application. Secondly, there are currently operational/technical constraints for making the Tool web-based.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Edited to say: I'm not trying to turn this personal against your business. I believe I've purchased 2 full subscriptions at the PLT level now, matter of fact.
Indeed, and I certainly appreciate your continued support of the project.
__________________
«··········» [KVS Availability Tool: Main Thread]
KVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 07, 7:03 pm   #1639
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Earth
Programs: Various but few meaningful ones
Posts: 1,394
Question

Greetings,

I was wondering if this could be something to work on in the future perhaps. KVS is giving me this as below:

[KVS Availability Tool 3.0.0/Platinum - Amadeus: Timetable/NL-BCDF]
Code:
SIN  Singapore Changi SG [WSSS]
LAX  Los Angeles Int'l CA US [KLAX]
MON  03 Mar 2008 - 10 Mar 2008

Carrier   Flight From Depart    To   Arrive    A/C  St   Frequency | Dur'n | Dep T | Arr T | Effect | Ending | Exceptions
--------- ------ ---- --------- ---- --------- ---- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
SQ        28     SIN  17:15     LAX  18:40     EQV  1    123456-     17:25       3       B   03 Mar   10 Mar   Mon 10 Mar
SQ        28     SIN  17:15     LAX  19:40     EQV  1    1-----7     17:25       3       B   03 Mar   10 Mar   Mon 03 Mar
As you can see it is EQV.

But if you access via another Amadeus system you get this:

TN01MARTPELAX/ASQ -TC-
** AMADEUS TIMETABLE - TN ** LAX LOS ANGELES.USCA 01MAR08 08MAR08

1 SQ 028 257 TPE 2 LAX B 2255 1840 0 02MAR08 07MAR08 772 11:45
2 SQ 028 1346 TPE 2 LAX B 2255 1840 0 01MAR08 08MAR08 77W 11:45

Which clearly shows B77E operating on Tuesday, Friday Saturday with the B77W operating on all other dates making it a daily service.

Is it just a case of different POS access points?
Singapore_Air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 07, 12:19 am   #1640
KVS
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Planet Earth, Solar System
Programs: KVS Availability Tool
Posts: 6,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Singapore_Air View Post
Greetings,

I was wondering if this could be something to work on in the future perhaps. KVS is giving me this as below:

As you can see it is EQV.

But if you access via another Amadeus system you get this:

Which clearly shows B77E operating on Tuesday, Friday Saturday with the B77W operating on all other dates making it a daily service.

Is it just a case of different POS access points?
The current timetable engine does not 'break-up' flights if the only difference is the equipment type. This is done by the engine itself, so I have no control over this...
__________________
«··········» [KVS Availability Tool: Main Thread]
KVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 07, 4:47 am   #1641
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Earth
Programs: Various but few meaningful ones
Posts: 1,394
Ahh OK. Thanks KVS!
Singapore_Air is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 07, 5:53 am   #1642
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,554
FYI
The Alaska award tool sometimes seems to do a superior job finding Skyteam bookings in the domestic US, in particular where AS/Horizon or DL/Skywest flights are required (in other words a big swath of the west coast). The AS tool also shows AA awards, and so it's really a nice supplement to both the ST and OW functions you have built into KVS. I know most people dont have AS accounts, but given how well it does building unconventional routes in the domestic US when the NW itool shows the same old 12:55am redeye, it is worth checking out.
stephem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 07, 4:50 am   #1643
KVS
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Planet Earth, Solar System
Programs: KVS Availability Tool
Posts: 6,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephem View Post
FYI
The Alaska award tool sometimes seems to do a superior job finding Skyteam bookings in the domestic US, in particular where AS/Horizon or DL/Skywest flights are required (in other words a big swath of the west coast). The AS tool also shows AA awards, and so it's really a nice supplement to both the ST and OW functions you have built into KVS. I know most people dont have AS accounts, but given how well it does building unconventional routes in the domestic US when the NW itool shows the same old 12:55am redeye, it is worth checking out.
Thanks for the info -- I will look into this...
__________________
«··········» [KVS Availability Tool: Main Thread]
KVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 07, 2:52 am   #1644
KVS
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Planet Earth, Solar System
Programs: KVS Availability Tool
Posts: 6,328
Exclamation Absence Alert

Just a reminder that an absence alert, which has been posted on the KVS Tool's homepage for the last two weeks, will come into effect shortly.

However, please feel free to submit registration/upgrade requests at any time, as I will be responding to all accumulated requests/e-mails upon my return.

For Platinum-tier members, holding a valid registration as of 01 December 2007, access to the KVS Tool Online Companion will continue to be available throughout this entire period (regardless of the actual expiration date).

Thanks for understanding and happy holidays!
__________________
«··········» [KVS Availability Tool: Main Thread]
KVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 07, 7:48 am   #1645
I Voted
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC SE / HH Diamond
Posts: 5,409
Have a good trip! You may find my registration renewal when you return!
__________________
PB ...
PreferBulkhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 07, 9:19 am   #1646
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by KVS View Post

New [Amadeus: Awards/OneWorld] Method:


Shows available awards on most OneWorld carriers (QF/BA/AA/AY/IB/MA + EI)
QF FFP Membership Number and PIN are required to use this Method; instant online enrolment available at https://www.qantas.com.au/fflyer/dyns/joinff
I noticed that LAN is not on your list. Since the QF website allows me to search for LAN awards, is this a typo or intentional? Thanks.
rrgg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 07, 12:04 am   #1647
I Voted
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SFO/SJC/OAK
Programs: CO Plat (thanks to FT), UA 1P, AA
Posts: 299
Problems with Skyteam Awards availability.

Hi KVS,

I am looking for award availability from SFO to EZE, using ORT: Skyteam Awards, yet all that shows me is availability on CO. I know there are flights to EZE on DL and AM too, but they are not coming up! Even when I use ATL-EZE as city pairs, only CO flights are showing up...

Anybody else seen this?
__________________
E.
enmascarado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 07, 8:33 pm   #1648
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: charlotte NC
Programs: US GP
Posts: 225
Hello. Is there someone that can help me with a technical issue in KVS' absence? I am getting the 12029 connection error. I reviewed the FAQs, and I deleted the program from my firewall programs, and when that didn't work, I disabled both the firewall and all of Norton 360--still getting the error message.

I did a search of this thread, and I wasn't able to find anything other than someone who got a new firewall! I prefer not to do that.

If more appropriate to PM then here that's fine. I appreciate anyone who is able to help. Thank you.
la2clt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 07, 11:19 am   #1649
I Voted
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Programs: OnePass, Avis, Marriott
Posts: 6,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by KVS View Post
The use of a Mac is one's choice and I certainly respect that. I am willing to make reasonable accommodations in terms of compatibility (for example, an alternative keyboard shortcut was introduced to accommodate Mac users, who couldn't "right click").

Re-writing 15 000+ lines of code and taking a hit on decreased application performance from the use of "platform-independent" solutions? Sorry, but I would have to say no.

In any case, now that Apple had finally acknowledged the idiocy behind using a non-Intel processor architecture on consumer-grade machines, running a Win32 application on a modern Mac is easier than ever: http://kvs.unrealnetwork.com/Images/...elsDesktop.gif
I was actually going to ask a similar question when I saw this.

From a developer standpoint, the answer is simple, branch the product while developing a core library/framework from which to work. C/C++/C# aren't that much different than ObjectiveC.

Though from the looks of it, you may have written KVS in Delphi.

Ever thought about using something that is truly cross-platform that doesn't suffer a performance hit (such as Python)?
__________________
2009 EUAs (on eligible segments): 18/25 (72%) - Y-UPs: 0/0
Hartmann is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 07, 3:25 pm   #1650
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver, HH Gold, PC Plat Amb
Posts: 1,367
How do I find out what the class codes are for QR? I thought the highest classes were always first, but the following doesnt seem to follow that principle:

QR 11 DOH 07:40 LHR 13:25 332 0 F2 P4 A0 O0 C4 J2 D4 I0 Y4 B4 L4 M4 Q4 K4 H4 V4 T4 G4 W4 N0

This might suggest that F/P are first class, and C/J are business. But why more P than F spaces and more J than C spaces. Also what is the A and O? Too many First class codes?
kryten22uk is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:37 pm.




SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0