Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

What were the penalties for American flight crews seducing female passengers?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What were the penalties for American flight crews seducing female passengers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2017, 2:21 am
  #1  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
What were the penalties for American flight crews seducing female passengers?

For at least some forty years after the end of World War 2, the US had a law on the books that made it a federal crime for American transport vessel employees to seduce female passengers.

What were the penalties for the violation of that law, and what was considered criminal "seduction" under that law?

Canada too had a law that had much the same kind of language making this a crime.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 10:19 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,004
cites?
CPRich is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 10:27 am
  #3  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by CPRich
cites?
Here's Canada's history with it: http://www.constancebackhouse.ca/fil...e/sed_pass.htm

Here's that of the US indicated in the OP:

18 USC 2198 Seduction of Female Passenger (criminal) and work from that.

PUBLIC LAWS-CH. 645-JUNE 25, 1948 § 2198. SEDUCTION OF FEMALE PASSENGER Whoever, being a master, officer, seaman, or other person employed on board of any American vessel, during the voyage, under promise of marriage, or by threats, or the exercise of authority, or solicitation, or the making of gifts or presents, seduces and has illicit connection with any female passenger, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or impris- oned not more than one year, or both. Subsequent intermarriage of the parties may be pleaded in bar of conviction and no conviction shall be had on the testimony of the female seduced without other evidence.
That answers it.

Last edited by GUWonder; Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36 am
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 11:57 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
id imagine lots of similar in past, things (in west) continue to evolve, although for example in US states can be slow to change, and still occasionally do questionable prosecutions
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 12:05 pm
  #5  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
id imagine lots of similar in past, things (in west) continue to evolve, although for example in US states can be slow to change, and still occasionally do questionable prosecutions
I'm now curious when was the last time someone was charged for a criminal violation of this law that was on the US books until around 1990.

I'm also curious which countries still have these kind of laws on the books applicable to vessel crews.

There are a lot of old laws at state/local levels that made little to no sense in modern times -- things like a judge not wearing a hat while on horseback on Sunday being a punishable violation of law -- and got rescinded or ignored for a long time.

I would assume that federal laws applicable to flight crews have been way more in the spotlight than those kind of laws.

Last edited by GUWonder; Mar 29, 2017 at 12:11 pm
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 12:32 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,901
Originally Posted by GUWonder
There are a lot of old laws at state/local levels that made little to no sense in modern times -- things like a judge not wearing a hat while on horseback on Sunday being a punishable violation of law -- and got rescinded or ignored for a long time.
There are some winners on this list:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2337385/posts
milepig is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 4:59 pm
  #7  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by CPRich
cites?
An older American version of the law did this:

http://www.nytimes.com/1864/10/02/ne...ttachment.html
GUWonder is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.