Travel Expenses: Dumb Things your Company has Done
#16
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,393
Rental car rates on a daily basis that cover only intermediate and full size cars. No weekend or weekly rates.
#17
#18
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC SE (*A Gold), Bonvoy Platinum Elite, Hilton Gold, Amex Platinum / AP Reserve, NEXUS, Global Entry
Posts: 5,691
If an employee is willing to save the company substantial money in exchange for giving up his or her weekend, then I'd happily pay the extra hotel nights and meals. Put differently, if an employee had >5 business days' worth of work to do on a trip, would you expect that employee to pay the 2 weekend nights and meals out of pocket?
If, on the other hand, the employee wants to bookend a business trip with a couple of personal days, then I'd expect the employee to pick up the difference in transportation costs (if any) while covering his or her own hotel nights and meals. And if those days fall on work days, then the employee should also either use vacation days or banked time to offset the time off.
#19
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat
Posts: 756
I actually don't agree with this
If an employee is willing to save the company substantial money in exchange for giving up his or her weekend, then I'd happily pay the extra hotel nights and meals. Put differently, if an employee had >5 business days' worth of work to do on a trip, would you expect that employee to pay the 2 weekend nights and meals out of pocket?
If, on the other hand, the employee wants to bookend a business trip with a couple of personal days, then I'd expect the employee to pick up the difference in transportation costs (if any) while covering his or her own hotel nights and meals. And if those days fall on work days, then the employee should also either use vacation days or banked time to offset the time off.
If an employee is willing to save the company substantial money in exchange for giving up his or her weekend, then I'd happily pay the extra hotel nights and meals. Put differently, if an employee had >5 business days' worth of work to do on a trip, would you expect that employee to pay the 2 weekend nights and meals out of pocket?
If, on the other hand, the employee wants to bookend a business trip with a couple of personal days, then I'd expect the employee to pick up the difference in transportation costs (if any) while covering his or her own hotel nights and meals. And if those days fall on work days, then the employee should also either use vacation days or banked time to offset the time off.
#20
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC SE (*A Gold), Bonvoy Platinum Elite, Hilton Gold, Amex Platinum / AP Reserve, NEXUS, Global Entry
Posts: 5,691
I totally agree with that. I'm just saying any company policy that insists on you *not* staying the weekend so they can pay much, much more for your trip is a poor policy.
#21
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Montreal
Programs: Aeroplan
Posts: 204
"No alcohol except with a customer" is a very standard expectation.
I never eat breakfast at a hotel unless its included in the rate. Usually wildly overpriced, and I don't need much for breakfast anyway. I'm actually fine with the in room coffee (or often free in the lobby) along with a breakfast bar that I pack a supply of.
In many cases my loyalty gives me access to a lounge and that is often both my evening meal and morning breakfast.
I never eat breakfast at a hotel unless its included in the rate. Usually wildly overpriced, and I don't need much for breakfast anyway. I'm actually fine with the in room coffee (or often free in the lobby) along with a breakfast bar that I pack a supply of.
In many cases my loyalty gives me access to a lounge and that is often both my evening meal and morning breakfast.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 15,351
"No alcohol except with a customer" is a very standard expectation.
I never eat breakfast at a hotel unless its included in the rate. Usually wildly overpriced, and I don't need much for breakfast anyway. I'm actually fine with the in room coffee (or often free in the lobby) along with a breakfast bar that I pack a supply of.
In many cases my loyalty gives me access to a lounge and that is often both my evening meal and morning breakfast.
I never eat breakfast at a hotel unless its included in the rate. Usually wildly overpriced, and I don't need much for breakfast anyway. I'm actually fine with the in room coffee (or often free in the lobby) along with a breakfast bar that I pack a supply of.
In many cases my loyalty gives me access to a lounge and that is often both my evening meal and morning breakfast.
My method is this -- I do exactly what I'd do if I was on the trip on my own personal time and money.....unless I'm with a client or at an event.
If I want hotel breakfast, I get it. If I don't, I don't. Sometimes I'd rather have a quick bite or a sandwich out and I'll do that.
Our company will pay for alcohol on expenses and if I want a beer or two with dinner, I have one. Oh, and I don't eat breakfast or dinner in a hotel lounge, either, although I do use them for soda, water, and coffee.
Then again, I never, ever eat in a fancy place unless I'm dragged there, so I think the company does OK in the end.
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,573
Our policies around personal add on travel are reasonable - provided the end cost is the same or lower, it is ok. For example, a couple of years ago, I flew back from a business trip via the UK for a few nights instead of directly for an identical cost.
#24
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: LAX
Programs: AAdvantage EXPLAT, Hilton Diamond, SPG/Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum, Citi Exec MC, Amex Plat
Posts: 1,443
If the employee is staying to save the company that much money, the company should pick up the hotel costs, otherwise there is zero incentive for the employee to do it, and the company gets to pay the full whack. When I worked for a consulting firm on multi week projects, the deal was you could either a) fly home for the weekend b) fly anywhere else for the weekend (provided same or lower cost - no additional hotel and meals would be approved) c) stay in town and hotel and meals paid or d) stay in town, spouse flight paid to join you, but hotel and meals not covered.
Our policies around personal add on travel are reasonable - provided the end cost is the same or lower, it is ok. For example, a couple of years ago, I flew back from a business trip via the UK for a few nights instead of directly for an identical cost.
Our policies around personal add on travel are reasonable - provided the end cost is the same or lower, it is ok. For example, a couple of years ago, I flew back from a business trip via the UK for a few nights instead of directly for an identical cost.
#25
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUL
Programs: AC SE (*A Gold), Bonvoy Platinum Elite, Hilton Gold, Amex Platinum / AP Reserve, NEXUS, Global Entry
Posts: 5,691
When I worked for a consulting firm on multi week projects, the deal was you could either a) fly home for the weekend b) fly anywhere else for the weekend (provided same or lower cost - no additional hotel and meals would be approved) c) stay in town and hotel and meals paid or d) stay in town, spouse flight paid to join you, but hotel and meals not covered.
FTFY
#26
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 20
We do allow employees to spend the weekend paying their own way (including the employee paying for an increase in flight costs if that's the case).
Even if you aren't billing a client for a trip, will the other employees at your company think that you're spending the weekend on the company's dime?
#27
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,559
If the employee is staying to save the company that much money, the company should pick up the hotel costs, otherwise there is zero incentive for the employee to do it, and the company gets to pay the full whack. When I worked for a consulting firm on multi week projects, the deal was you could either a) fly home for the weekend b) fly anywhere else for the weekend (provided same or lower cost - no additional hotel and meals would be approved) c) stay in town and hotel and meals paid or d) stay in town, spouse flight paid to join you, but hotel and meals not covered.
Our policies around personal add on travel are reasonable - provided the end cost is the same or lower, it is ok. For example, a couple of years ago, I flew back from a business trip via the UK for a few nights instead of directly for an identical cost.
Our policies around personal add on travel are reasonable - provided the end cost is the same or lower, it is ok. For example, a couple of years ago, I flew back from a business trip via the UK for a few nights instead of directly for an identical cost.
I wouldn't last long at a company that had moronic travel policies that compelled people to do stupid things that also cost the company money.
The only thing we do now is "encourage" people to use a travel agency website to book everything. The agency tacks on junk fees - and then more junk fees to change things, even hotels and airlines that don't have change fees. Fortunately, it's not a hard/fast rule, so I simply don't do it unless there's some value delivered by the agency. (e.g., Ticketing a multi-alliance itin that no one airline site seems to be able to do properly.) 75% of my trips are straightforward - all on one airline, staying at a basic Hilton or Marriott - I can book them directly and not deal with the agency.
#28
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC
Posts: 6,091
When I travel on behalf of my company we're charging incurred travel, hotel, dining expenses to the client associated with the trip. Because of that, even if it saves money to fly back after the weekend, it can look to the client as if we're spending the weekend on their dime. The client's accountants might understand, but will the rest of the employees at the client? Probably not.
We do allow employees to spend the weekend paying their own way (including the employee paying for an increase in flight costs if that's the case).
Even if you aren't billing a client for a trip, will the other employees at your company think that you're spending the weekend on the company's dime?
We do allow employees to spend the weekend paying their own way (including the employee paying for an increase in flight costs if that's the case).
Even if you aren't billing a client for a trip, will the other employees at your company think that you're spending the weekend on the company's dime?
As for preferred vendors costing more money, that's a maybe. The thought is that the discounts, incentives, and benefits of having preferred vendor relationships should result in a better financial position over the long term. Impossible to say that something like that costs the company money based just on one's limited anecdotal experiences.
#29
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC
Posts: 6,091
This is definitely true. As a consultant, certain clients (mostly government entities) will not reimburse alcohol. If I have a drink at dinner, it's on my own dime. For the vast majority of other clients, there is no such prohibition. In fact, when dining with clients during a project, they generally drink way more than me and expect that I'll just expense the cost.
#30
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: It's hot here
Posts: 4,284
I actually don't agree with this
If an employee is willing to save the company substantial money in exchange for giving up his or her weekend, then I'd happily pay the extra hotel nights and meals. Put differently, if an employee had >5 business days' worth of work to do on a trip, would you expect that employee to pay the 2 weekend nights and meals out of pocket?
If, on the other hand, the employee wants to bookend a business trip with a couple of personal days, then I'd expect the employee to pick up the difference in transportation costs (if any) while covering his or her own hotel nights and meals. And if those days fall on work days, then the employee should also either use vacation days or banked time to offset the time off.
If an employee is willing to save the company substantial money in exchange for giving up his or her weekend, then I'd happily pay the extra hotel nights and meals. Put differently, if an employee had >5 business days' worth of work to do on a trip, would you expect that employee to pay the 2 weekend nights and meals out of pocket?
If, on the other hand, the employee wants to bookend a business trip with a couple of personal days, then I'd expect the employee to pick up the difference in transportation costs (if any) while covering his or her own hotel nights and meals. And if those days fall on work days, then the employee should also either use vacation days or banked time to offset the time off.