Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Annoying Upgrade

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Annoying Upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2016, 6:16 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: AA
Posts: 286
Regardless of the OP's elitist attitude, if you want to get drunk on a flight and you're at the window, the only civilised thing to do is order straight liquor...less fluid, less urine.
Beven12S is offline  
Old Feb 10, 2016, 8:53 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NRT / HND
Programs: AA EXP, NH Plat, Former UA 1K
Posts: 5,665
Originally Posted by Beven12S
Regardless of the OP's elitist attitude, if you want to get drunk on a flight and you're at the window, the only civilised thing to do is order straight liquor...less fluid, less urine.
LOL, will keep in mind... thankfully I always sit in the aisle seat if I have the choice. I know I pee more than many people (been that way since a child) so I like to minimize the inconvenience to fellow passengers regardless of which cabin I'm sitting in.
dvs7310 is offline  
Old Feb 10, 2016, 8:56 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
Originally Posted by FlyingUnderTheRadar
The FA was wrong and not following federal regs and probably the airlines own rules.

14 CFR 121.575 - Alcoholic beverages.

§ 121.575 Alcoholic beverages.
(a) No person may drink any alcoholic beverage aboard an aircraft unless the certificate holder operating the aircraft has served that beverage to him.
(b) No certificate holder may serve any alcoholic beverage to any person aboard any of its aircraft who—
(1) Appears to be intoxicated;
(2) Is escorting a person or being escorted in accordance with49 CFR 1544.221; or
(3) Has a deadly or dangerous weapon accessible to him while aboard the aircraft in accordance with49 CFR 1544.219, 1544.221, or 1544.223.
(c) No certificate holder may allow any person to board any of its aircraft if that person appears to be intoxicated.

IMHO, I would be filing a complaint with the airline and the FAA.
I would love to get a bucket of popcorn and sit back and watch lawyers argue over the definition of "appears". No chance a FA is going to invoke that part of the reg when dealing with a passenger.
dchristiva is offline  
Old Feb 10, 2016, 12:37 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok or San Francisco
Programs: United 1k, Marriott Lifetime PE, Former DL Gold, Former SQ Solitaire, HH Gold
Posts: 11,886
Originally Posted by peterk814
I guess I shouldn't post on a public forum either cause I'm guaranteed to get at least one smug response
His smug response was spot on.
Tchiowa is offline  
Old Feb 10, 2016, 2:31 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: AA
Posts: 286
Originally Posted by Tchiowa
His smug response was spot on.
I would +1 this but I found the response more sarcastic and cutting than smug. Either way, it was spot on.
Beven12S is offline  
Old Feb 10, 2016, 3:07 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: CMH, HNL
Programs: UA, HA
Posts: 583
Schadenfreude: I would've loved to see this demented drama play out from the row behind. (+1 Horrible Person Point)

Seriously, why can't domestic do all-aisle access? (ok, maybe not serious...)
TheTakeOffRush is offline  
Old Feb 10, 2016, 3:12 pm
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Programs: No programs & No Points!!!
Posts: 14,222
Originally Posted by pinniped
I'm with the OP. I don't think the standard for serving obviously-hammered pax is "we keep feeding them beers until they affect the flight."
I agree. He was disturbing the flight in my opinion.
Annalisa12 is offline  
Old Feb 10, 2016, 5:12 pm
  #23  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,808
Originally Posted by peterk814
I guess I shouldn't post on a public forum either cause I'm guaranteed to get at least one smug response
Is it smug because he's right and you are wrong?
Proudelitist is offline  
Old Feb 10, 2016, 6:22 pm
  #24  
Used to be 'Travelergcp'
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Orleans
Programs: AA Plat, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,826
This is what headphones are for.

Or just politely ask the guy to quiet down.
TravelerMSY is offline  
Old Feb 10, 2016, 6:26 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: QFF Gold, Flying Blue, Enrich
Posts: 5,366
Originally Posted by gfunkdave
Heh, I kid because I care.
IMHO you performed a public service, getting that response over and done with so early in the thread.
BadgerBoi is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2016, 4:24 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Orleans (MSY)
Programs: AA EXP, IHG PLT, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Explorist, Amtrak, WN
Posts: 2,617
I don't understand why you fault the guy for making you get up so that he could get into the window seat, but I get the concern that the pax could become belligerent or get sick if he kept getting alcohol.

Was on a TPAC DFW-NRT flight with a highly-intoxicated seatmate who began projectile vomiting about 30 minutes after the conclusion of the meal service. He must've gone through five rum minis (in addition to the pre-departure drink and the drinks mixed in the galley) in the first 1.5 hours of the flight. Was talking to him in the lounge before the flight and he was pounding drinks there, too. He probably should not have been served any more alcohol after the second round.

Maybe your FA felt that he wasn't a problem, or that giving him drinks would keep the peace. Maybe his drinks were getting increasingly more "watery." I've been on flights where I've found my drinks getting increasingly more diluted after I've been through a few.
brewdog11 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.