Major Differences in Carrier 777 Coach Configurations (# of seats across)
Jul 25, 2015, 12:25 am
#16
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,419
I'll take your word for it. I was going by their website which shows 32 to 33 inches for B777-300 in Y.
http://www.airnewzealand.co.uk/seat-map-boeing-777-300
http://www.airnewzealand.co.uk/seat-map-boeing-777-300
Jul 27, 2015, 4:00 am
#19
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BSL
Programs: AA (EXP); among others :)
Posts: 2,520
ACs HD 77W (probably the worst offender in service today) has 458 seats, with seven rows of business class in front of the L2 doors and the PE cabin behind. Swapping the 24 PE seats for 40 economy seats would result in 474 seats. Using a denser business class product in that space - something like six rows of UAs 2-4-2 seating as on their 772 - would gain a few more seats as well, but still not 500.
Jul 27, 2015, 5:42 am
#20
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: KIX
Programs: ANA
Posts: 4
^
Not lie-flat, but something resembling business class seats on both JAL and ANA in domestic configurations of the 777-300.
JAL's configuration is 500 seats, ANA's is 514:
https://www.jal.co.jp/aircraft/conf/773.html
https://www.ana.co.jp/wws/japan/e/lo...ail.html?c=773
Not lie-flat, but something resembling business class seats on both JAL and ANA in domestic configurations of the 777-300.
JAL's configuration is 500 seats, ANA's is 514:
https://www.jal.co.jp/aircraft/conf/773.html
https://www.ana.co.jp/wws/japan/e/lo...ail.html?c=773
Jul 27, 2015, 9:19 am
#21
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E50K (*G) WS Gold | SPG/Fairmont Plat Hilton/Hyatt Diamond Marriott Silver | National Exec Elite
Posts: 19,284
BR for the win. New deliveries still at 9 across. And what? 33" pitch? And with WIFI now?
J got a bit worse (bathrooms got smaller), but I'll take Wifi over that. Plus, BR FA's... = uhh....frick it's against FT rules to write what I want to
J got a bit worse (bathrooms got smaller), but I'll take Wifi over that. Plus, BR FA's... = uhh....frick it's against FT rules to write what I want to
Jul 27, 2015, 10:00 am
#22
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SYD
Programs: QF
Posts: 490
Jul 27, 2015, 10:28 am
#23
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E50K (*G) WS Gold | SPG/Fairmont Plat Hilton/Hyatt Diamond Marriott Silver | National Exec Elite
Posts: 19,284
I don't think so..
ACs HD 77W (probably the worst offender in service today) has 458 seats, with seven rows of business class in front of the L2 doors and the PE cabin behind. Swapping the 24 PE seats for 40 economy seats would result in 474 seats. Using a denser business class product in that space - something like six rows of UAs 2-4-2 seating as on their 772 - would gain a few more seats as well, but still not 500.
ACs HD 77W (probably the worst offender in service today) has 458 seats, with seven rows of business class in front of the L2 doors and the PE cabin behind. Swapping the 24 PE seats for 40 economy seats would result in 474 seats. Using a denser business class product in that space - something like six rows of UAs 2-4-2 seating as on their 772 - would gain a few more seats as well, but still not 500.
Jul 28, 2015, 11:12 pm
#24
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 88
I don't think so..
ACs HD 77W (probably the worst offender in service today) has 458 seats, with seven rows of business class in front of the L2 doors and the PE cabin behind. Swapping the 24 PE seats for 40 economy seats would result in 474 seats. Using a denser business class product in that space - something like six rows of UAs 2-4-2 seating as on their 772 - would gain a few more seats as well, but still not 500.
ACs HD 77W (probably the worst offender in service today) has 458 seats, with seven rows of business class in front of the L2 doors and the PE cabin behind. Swapping the 24 PE seats for 40 economy seats would result in 474 seats. Using a denser business class product in that space - something like six rows of UAs 2-4-2 seating as on their 772 - would gain a few more seats as well, but still not 500.
Last edited by ren0312; Jul 29, 2015 at 1:35 am
Jul 29, 2015, 3:58 pm
#25
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Assuming "CR" means crew member in this context the rule is one per 50 seats. But that's just the number required for overall safety reasons; there is no rule about how many need to be stationed in which cabin for serving meals or such.
Jul 29, 2015, 7:51 pm
#26
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 88
CR means lavatory. Is 1 lavatory for 80 or 70 seats acceptable for a 777-300er economy?
Jul 31, 2015, 2:20 am
#30
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Munich, Germany
Programs: UA*S, TK*G, BA G
Posts: 361
