is business class too luxurious in some airlines
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 88
Is business class too upmarket on some airlines nowadays? And hence possibly too Expensive? When you look at it all you need in business class is a good flat bed, while the upgraded ones by qantas on their a330 and American Airlines seem to be too much what is really should just be a seat that can be converted into a bed. And even comparing premium economy to this new business class the gap seems to be too large, it seems the ordinary business class you see on air France, aeroflot, and the old business class on qantas before the upgrade is much more appropriate in terms of the price point and what business class needs without making it too much like first class. The problem is that this makes business class too unnecessarily bloated and expensive, while pricing the ordinary business class traveler out of the market, who only wants a flat bed or a near flat bed with decent food at a sensible compared to economy class
class without having too pawn Buckingham Palace just to afford business class.
Too expand on my point, for example business class on American Airlines 777-300er is too much when they can they have a 2-3-2 7 across business class cabin that still had lie flat beds and adequate personal space at a much less expensive price.
class without having too pawn Buckingham Palace just to afford business class.
Too expand on my point, for example business class on American Airlines 777-300er is too much when they can they have a 2-3-2 7 across business class cabin that still had lie flat beds and adequate personal space at a much less expensive price.
Last edited by JY1024; Jun 26, 2015 at 12:52 pm Reason: merged consecutive posts
#2
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the air
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Gold, GHA Tit, BA Gold, Turkish Elite
Posts: 8,712
British Airways would agree with you, but most other airlines appear to have research to suggest that people are happy to have their firms pay a premium for more space.
Let's see who ends up being right. I've certainly shifted most of my longhaul J traffic (not that there is much now) away from BA in the last few years.
Let's see who ends up being right. I've certainly shifted most of my longhaul J traffic (not that there is much now) away from BA in the last few years.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2012
Programs: BA Gold, QF WP
Posts: 12,551
Have you flown on any of these airlines and seats?
#6
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: ORD
Programs: United 1K (Star Alliance Gold) IHG Platinum
Posts: 226
YES.. AIRLINE LUXURY HAS RUINED MY LIFE.
Ok so that's a bit extreme, but I'm only partly joking. Here is what's happening:
1) I love international travel. My lifelong goal is to visit as many countries as possible.
2) I used to travel economy.. hated it, but sucked it up just to travel.
3) I switched jobs about 1 1/2 years ago. New company pays for business class.
4) I am now super spoiled and can never fly economy again.
5) I just booked a vacation for Dominican Republic, a relatively short flight - and I used extra miles to book first class. just because I can't handle being stuffed in the back.
6) I am now worried that I'll be forced to cut my recreational travel because I am such a snob and use too many miles on each flight for upgrades.
If biz class weren't so much better than economy, this never would have happened! Maybe they should just make economy a bit better so you don't feel like cattle being herded into a sardine can!
Ok so that's a bit extreme, but I'm only partly joking. Here is what's happening:
1) I love international travel. My lifelong goal is to visit as many countries as possible.
2) I used to travel economy.. hated it, but sucked it up just to travel.
3) I switched jobs about 1 1/2 years ago. New company pays for business class.
4) I am now super spoiled and can never fly economy again.
5) I just booked a vacation for Dominican Republic, a relatively short flight - and I used extra miles to book first class. just because I can't handle being stuffed in the back.
6) I am now worried that I'll be forced to cut my recreational travel because I am such a snob and use too many miles on each flight for upgrades.
If biz class weren't so much better than economy, this never would have happened! Maybe they should just make economy a bit better so you don't feel like cattle being herded into a sardine can!
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM
Posts: 23,293
No?
Because very few people actually pay for it.
Most of the time it is (as the name implies) used to shuttle people around for work, paid for by employer/client.
And definitely not luxurious, especially on North American airlines. Business class is pretty pathetic when you hand out most of it to free upgrades.
Because very few people actually pay for it.
Most of the time it is (as the name implies) used to shuttle people around for work, paid for by employer/client.
And definitely not luxurious, especially on North American airlines. Business class is pretty pathetic when you hand out most of it to free upgrades.
#9
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: ORD
Programs: United 1K (Star Alliance Gold) IHG Platinum
Posts: 226
Internationally, the US carriers seem to be pretty decent for the most part. Lay-flat bed and lots of food and drinks. That's luxury (compared to economy) in my book.
Of course, where I've gotten really spoiled are the lounges. I can't sit in an airport restaurant anymore. I'll go hungry rather than leave the lounge.
#10
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,554
My only question is: where is this fantasyland AA 773 with attentive, friendly service and oenophilic and culinary nirvana in J?
I've only gotten the one with surly FAs and undrinkable wine.
If we're going to accuse anyone of overdoing the J experience, it sure isn't AA.
As for the gap between J and Y being too large, I honestly don't have a good answer for why a legitimate Premium Economy product (say, 40" x 21" with palatable "call" wines and spirits) only exists on a small number of airlines. Perhaps because there are a few companies who fly their employees in J and a lot of companies that fly their employees in Y. Airlines may be concerned that a *good* PE product would nudge a lot of those J firms down to PE, but *not* upsell many Y firms to PE. If the corporate J buyers are cannibalized by PE, then the airline has to try to sell J to individual buyers, which cuts the price point in half.
I've only gotten the one with surly FAs and undrinkable wine.
If we're going to accuse anyone of overdoing the J experience, it sure isn't AA.
As for the gap between J and Y being too large, I honestly don't have a good answer for why a legitimate Premium Economy product (say, 40" x 21" with palatable "call" wines and spirits) only exists on a small number of airlines. Perhaps because there are a few companies who fly their employees in J and a lot of companies that fly their employees in Y. Airlines may be concerned that a *good* PE product would nudge a lot of those J firms down to PE, but *not* upsell many Y firms to PE. If the corporate J buyers are cannibalized by PE, then the airline has to try to sell J to individual buyers, which cuts the price point in half.
#11
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,369
Or the airlines specialize a bit, with some deciding to offer PE becasue they think it will be profitable on their routes. In the USA, some legacy carriers offer IFC on some routes and others do not. Another example is that AF and KLM are sort of like a single company, but AF has IFC and PE while KLM does not.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,684
Is business class too upmarket on some airlines nowadays? And hence possibly too Expensive? When you look at it all you need in business class is a good flat bed, while the upgraded ones by qantas on their a330 and American Airlines seem to be too much what is really should just be a seat that can be converted into a bed. And even comparing premium economy to this new business class the gap seems to be too large, it seems the ordinary business class you see on air France, aeroflot, and the old business class on qantas before the upgrade is much more appropriate in terms of the price point and what business class needs without making it too much like first class. The problem is that this makes business class too unnecessarily bloated and expensive, while pricing the ordinary business class traveler out of the market, who only wants a flat bed or a near flat bed with decent food at a sensible compared to economy class
class without having too pawn Buckingham Palace just to afford business class.
Too expand on my point, for example business class on American Airlines 777-300er is too much when they can they have a 2-3-2 7 across business class cabin that still had lie flat beds and adequate personal space at a much less expensive price.
class without having too pawn Buckingham Palace just to afford business class.
Too expand on my point, for example business class on American Airlines 777-300er is too much when they can they have a 2-3-2 7 across business class cabin that still had lie flat beds and adequate personal space at a much less expensive price.
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
There is essentially no business class on domestic US. A couple of premium routes, bits and pieces of positioning and the like.
For international, it's all about market research. It's only too luxurious if the cost of the service drives the price past profitability.
As premium cabins are the lion's share of the profits on international routes, it strikes me as doubtful that any carrier is providing too much luxury for the market it serves.
If what you want is a no frills lie flat service so you can be rested on arrival, that's not in the cards in this day and age.
For international, it's all about market research. It's only too luxurious if the cost of the service drives the price past profitability.
As premium cabins are the lion's share of the profits on international routes, it strikes me as doubtful that any carrier is providing too much luxury for the market it serves.
If what you want is a no frills lie flat service so you can be rested on arrival, that's not in the cards in this day and age.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Not here; there!
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold
Posts: 29,530
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry: BlackBerry8530/5.0.0.1030 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/417)
For TATL travel, the OP might want to investigate the offerings of La Compagnie, as well as those of Open Skies.
For TATL travel, the OP might want to investigate the offerings of La Compagnie, as well as those of Open Skies.
#15
Used to be 'Travelergcp'
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Orleans
Programs: AA Plat, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,826
The expense is in the weight and footprint of the seat- not so much the service or IFE. So if you want a flat bed that consumes the space of 3-4 coach seats, you're going to have to pay up for it.