Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Do you not wonder where I've gone?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Do you not wonder where I've gone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2015, 4:00 am
  #31  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Programs: A3*G, LH FTL, VS Red, Avis Preferred, Hertz President's Circle, (RIP Diamond Club)
Posts: 2,364
Originally Posted by cbn42
One problem with your position is that you are assuming that airlines could win customers back by contacting them.
No, I'm not. Winning customers back is likely to be expensive. I'm talking about finding out why they left and maybe preventing other customers from doing so by fixing the issue IF it is cost effective to do so.

Originally Posted by cbn42
Most people are not loyal to any airline and book whateve is cheapest, or they are locked into one airline due to a corporate contract or frequent flier program. If someone has decided to "leave" an airline for whatever reason, it's highly unlikely that an e-mail or phone call is going to bring them back. Writing an algorithm to track people's flying patterns, identify those who may have switched to another carrier, and contacting them, is likely not worth the cost.

1. As another commenter said, they can already do that through random surveys. There is no need to contact every single person.

2. These days, there isn't much that distinguishes airlines from each other. Sure, a very few people might switch from A to B because they didn't like the food, but more than likely about the same number switched from B to A for the same reason. Given that almost everyone books on schedule and price, there is really no point watching these things and trying to track the minute differences between airlines. It's more worthwhile to invest on price and schedule.
True, but why let business go cheaply? Like I've said before there may be a free/cheap thing they can do to retain regular customers, so why focus solely on discounting fares?

Last edited by roberino; Apr 16, 2015 at 6:53 am
roberino is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2015, 9:53 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,438
Originally Posted by roberino
I used to regularly fly to the US on VS so I had gold status for four years (and then some) with my butt in a Y seat every step of the way. Hard earned. One year I earned 70 tier points that way. I also had a long-held BD gold account that I earned solely through EU travel.

Then things changed. I had one bad year with my company and lost the VS gold status by a grand total of 2 tier points! I also lost my BD gold when BA bought BD and my account became BA gold, but since I hate BA with a passion (long story) I didn't fly a single flight with them.

My question is this. When a previously very loyal customer suddenly stops taking any flights with an airline are they not even slightly curious as to where they've gone? I mean, I didn't even get an "it's been a while since we've seen you" email. Are they not wondering what it was that made me not take a single further flight with them? Surely this is important information for their marketing group?

I appreciate that there are plenty of reasons why a customer might do this:

- Retirement? I'm 35...
- Change of job? Nope...
- Sudden crushing avatophobia? Hardly...
- Died? Well Bruce Willis isn't following me around...

Can anyone explain this?
"Do you not wonder where I've gone?" I thought for sure this thread was going to be about the myriad of once very active FT'ers who have disappeared from these forums over the years.

As for the airlines - they don't give a rat's arse if you're flying with them or not. You're merely a passenger on the bus
VivoPerLei is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2015, 10:02 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DCA/IAD
Programs: AS, US, Hilton, BA, DL, SPG, AA, VS
Posts: 1,628
Originally Posted by roberino
Because it could be an easy or cheap thing to fix.
The problem is that you're assuming it's worth fixing. The airlines apparently don't think it is.
LETTERBOY is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2015, 11:50 am
  #34  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,368
Originally Posted by roberino
No, I'm not. Winning customers back is likely to be expensive. I'm talking about finding out why they left and maybe preventing other customers from doing so by fixing the issue IF it is cost effective to do so. ...
well ... what makes it not cost-effective is that what might fix YOUR issue isn't what fixes Customer X's issue, and what fixes Customer X's issue isn't what fixes Customer Y's issue, and ... ad infinitum ad nauseum ...

further, six weeks or months or six years from now, you (and Customer X, and Customer Y) are likely to cite something else as your critical issue that is driving you to find a different airline
jrl767 is online now  
Old Apr 16, 2015, 4:35 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: US Air, UA BA LH AI DELTA MARRIOTT CHOICE SGP
Posts: 9,883
Originally Posted by cbn42
One problem with your position is that you are assuming that airlines could win customers back by contacting them. Most p....

<SNIPPED>

2. These days, there isn't much that distinguishes airlines from each other. Sure, a very few people might switch from A to B because they didn't like the food, but more than likely about the same number switched from B to A for the same reason. Given that almost everyone books on schedule and price, there is really no point watching these things and trying to track the minute differences between airlines. It's more worthwhile to invest on price and schedule.
Isn' that why LCC are born and prosper ?
HMPS is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2015, 5:05 pm
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Programs: No programs & No Points!!!
Posts: 14,222
I always wonder why first timers of a particular airline in F are not treated specially. You might like that airline and then move all of your business there. It isn't just regulars that should be treated with fanfare.
Annalisa12 is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2015, 5:26 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SJC/SFO
Programs: WN A+ CP, UA 1MM/*A Gold, Mar LT Tit, IHG Plat, HH Dia
Posts: 6,284
Originally Posted by cbn42
2. These days, there isn't much that distinguishes airlines from each other. Sure, a very few people might switch from A to B because they didn't like the food, but more than likely about the same number switched from B to A for the same reason. Given that almost everyone books on schedule and price, there is really no point watching these things and trying to track the minute differences between airlines. It's more worthwhile to invest on price and schedule.
I say something similar about cable TV service anytime one of my friends complains how terrible XYZ's service is or how RST are the biggest crooks ever. "The worst cable TV company is the one you've got, because they've had the chance to frustrate you most recently." This is the reality of shopping in an industry controlled by a small number of huge players.
darthbimmer is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2015, 8:24 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: US Air, UA BA LH AI DELTA MARRIOTT CHOICE SGP
Posts: 9,883
Originally Posted by darthbimmer
I say something similar about cable TV service anytime one of my friends complains how terrible XYZ's service is or how RST are the biggest crooks ever. "The worst cable TV company is the one you've got, because they've had the chance to frustrate you most recently." This is the reality of shopping in an industry controlled by a small number of huge players.
yes this akin to a salesman is as good as his last sale or the restaurant is as good as your last meal there......However the problem arises when many more CUSTOMERS start to feel they have been " cheated" out of what they paid for.
HMPS is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 1:59 am
  #39  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Programs: A3*G, LH FTL, VS Red, Avis Preferred, Hertz President's Circle, (RIP Diamond Club)
Posts: 2,364
Originally Posted by jrl767
well ... what makes it not cost-effective is that what might fix YOUR issue isn't what fixes Customer X's issue, and what fixes Customer X's issue isn't what fixes Customer Y's issue, and ... ad infinitum ad nauseum ...

further, six weeks or months or six years from now, you (and Customer X, and Customer Y) are likely to cite something else as your critical issue that is driving you to find a different airline
That type of issue falls neatly into the category of "not cost effective" then.
roberino is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 2:12 am
  #40  
Hilton Contributor BadgeHyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the air
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Gold, GHA Tit, BA Gold, Turkish Elite
Posts: 8,717
Originally Posted by Annalisa12
I always wonder why first timers of a particular airline in F are not treated specially. You might like that airline and then move all of your business there. It isn't just regulars that should be treated with fanfare.
British Airways is often quite good with first-time F visitors. I remember being exceedingly well looked after on my first trip. The trouble with BA as ever is that it's entirety inconsistent - and you never have a second first time (though I seem to remember pretending with a friend on our third trip that it was..).
EuropeanPete is online now  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 8:01 am
  #41  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok or San Francisco
Programs: United 1k, Marriott Lifetime PE, Former DL Gold, Former SQ Solitaire, HH Gold
Posts: 11,886
Originally Posted by darthbimmer
I say something similar about cable TV service anytime one of my friends complains how terrible XYZ's service is or how RST are the biggest crooks ever. "The worst cable TV company is the one you've got, because they've had the chance to frustrate you most recently." This is the reality of shopping in an industry controlled by a small number of huge players.
^
Tchiowa is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 10:59 am
  #42  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Programs: AA EXP/LTP, BA GGL/CCR/GfL, HH D/LTD, SPG/MR Plat/LTP
Posts: 10,075
Originally Posted by brendog

<snip>

No matter how much you love a brick, it will never love you back...
Not so sure about that. I had a girlfriend in a suburb to Berlin, surname Tegel (as airport), german word for brick. Not fitting your description...

onobond is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 5:56 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: US Air, UA BA LH AI DELTA MARRIOTT CHOICE SGP
Posts: 9,883
Originally Posted by onobond
Not so sure about that. I had a girlfriend in a suburb to Berlin, surname Tegel (as airport), german word for brick. Not fitting your description...

Built like a brick house ?
HMPS is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 6:56 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 3,360
Originally Posted by roberino
That type of issue falls neatly into the category of "not cost effective" then.
Except it's not that simple. We're talking about a business that operates multiple locations across multiple countries. Airlines also run complex and interrelated computer system. As jrl767 notes, when you make a change to fix one problem, that change may result in creating a new set of problems. Even the simplest of "fixes" needs to be thoroughly tested to ensure that it doesn't break stuff. That's not cheap.

Example: I was Revenue Manager at the "flagship" hotel of a worldwide hotel company. As we were corporate-owned/operated, we were the beta-testing site for the CRM (customer relationship management) software that's now used at hotels in the chain.

I recall one seemingly simple update managed to break the link between the PMS (property management system) and the wake-up call system. That resulted in understandably angry guests who never got wake-up calls. It took days to figure out the problem because the programmers insisted that the CRM update couldn't be the root cause.

My point is that determining that something is "not cost effective" is never easy in a complex system like an airline.
writerguyfl is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 11:22 pm
  #45  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
Originally Posted by brendog
focus on lucrative corporate contracts
Originally Posted by HMPS
Sounds like 20 % of the regulars provide 80 % of revenue?
Originally Posted by writerguyfl
best customer is not the individual traveler who has top-tier elite status. A hotel's best customer is the local corporation who requires all visiting employees to stay at that hotel. It all comes down to numbers. At best, a single traveler can only provide 365/366 room nights each year. Of course, that's theoretical since virtually no one lives in a single hotel. A local company can easily provide hundreds to thousands of room nights for a single hotel.
best customers (including 0.01%) spend a lot >

http://www.hotelnewsnow.com/articles...Clock-check-in
According to van Paasschen, just two percent of travelers drive 30 percent of Starwoods profits
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...otel-bill.html
Kagehitokiri is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.