Boeing fulfills one of humanity’s basic needs – bigger overhead bins
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BSL
Programs: AA (EXP); among others :)
Posts: 2,522
Boeing fulfills one of humanity’s basic needs – bigger overhead bins
just saw this: http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/2...ead-bins.html/
Seems like Alaska will be the first airline to have those on their new 737 deliveries.
I just wonder what took them so long. The trend to ever more carryon luggage has been going on for more than a decade.
Seems like Alaska will be the first airline to have those on their new 737 deliveries.
I just wonder what took them so long. The trend to ever more carryon luggage has been going on for more than a decade.
#2
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Programs: AS,WN,UA,B6,hotels
Posts: 4,239
Since a 737-MAX-9 supposedly carries 180-192 passengers, the claimed capacity of 194 rollaboards means more than one per passenger.
Of course, that presumes that passengers put the bags in properly, and that the bags (including wheels, handles, etc.) are not larger than the manufacturer's claimed size.
Of course, that presumes that passengers put the bags in properly, and that the bags (including wheels, handles, etc.) are not larger than the manufacturer's claimed size.
#3
Join Date: Jun 2013
Programs: DL Plat, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat, Hertz Prez Circle, National Exec
Posts: 1,357
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Like adding roads and the effect that has on vehicle traffic, the bags will simply expand to fill every available space. US carriers need to start enforcing their rules rather than just giving more space for people to make it easier to break the rules.
#5
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Programs: AS,WN,UA,B6,hotels
Posts: 4,239
Of course, there are also baggage makers who lie about the size of their baggage.
(from http://blog.sfgate.com/travel/2014/0...rs/#24011101=4 )
Originally Posted by sfgate.com
Brand new bag out of the box. The tag says it's carry-on compliant and is 9 inches deep, expandable to 11 inches. Yet, with nothing in it and not expanded, it's already 11 inches. Whether intentionally or not, the manufacturer is selling bags that are the wrong size.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Of course, there are also baggage makers who lie about the size of their baggage.
(from http://blog.sfgate.com/travel/2014/0...rs/#24011101=4 )
(from http://blog.sfgate.com/travel/2014/0...rs/#24011101=4 )
#7
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,307
#8
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DFW
Programs: Non-Affiliated
Posts: 7,430
What drives me batty is Mr. Carry On who can't stow their luggage above where they are sitting, and upon landing disrupts everyone trying to leave the aircraft because their bag is 4 rows behind.
#9
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SYD
Programs: QF
Posts: 490
Often Mr Carry On's luggage meets the luggage requirements but the moron sitting next to him brought most of his house with him and used up the entirety of the overhead compartment.
#10
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: LGA - JFK
Programs: UA, AA, DL, B6, CX, KE, Latitude, VIFP, Crown & Anchor, etc.
Posts: 2,589
And, what does Mr. Carry On do with his BB suit jacket - in the good old days when they used to have a place for FA to neatly hang the jacket and to stow the bag without getting crushed on top by other items (when checked luggage was free, etc. etc.) (Arrh, missed the DC-10 with the closet for my Armadillo garment bag in the 80's)
Somebody is going to turn theirs sideway & put their suit on top of the bag - and give that DYKWIA stare.
Then, what if some discount carriers decided that they don't want or need to downsize the options for all their flyers with their custom configuration. Plus, what to tell those flying regional/express jets or turbo's ... what to say, what to say when connecting
Somebody is going to turn theirs sideway & put their suit on top of the bag - and give that DYKWIA stare.
Then, what if some discount carriers decided that they don't want or need to downsize the options for all their flyers with their custom configuration. Plus, what to tell those flying regional/express jets or turbo's ... what to say, what to say when connecting
#11
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,857
And, what does Mr. Carry On do with his BB suit jacket - in the good old days when they used to have a place for FA to neatly hang the jacket and to stow the bag without getting crushed on top by other items (when checked luggage was free, etc. etc.) (Arrh, missed the DC-10 with the closet for my Armadillo garment bag in the 80's)
Somebody is going to turn theirs sideway & put their suit on top of the bag - and give that DYKWIA stare.
Then, what if some discount carriers decided that they don't want or need to downsize the options for all their flyers with their custom configuration. Plus, what to tell those flying regional/express jets or turbo's ... what to say, what to say when connecting
Somebody is going to turn theirs sideway & put their suit on top of the bag - and give that DYKWIA stare.
Then, what if some discount carriers decided that they don't want or need to downsize the options for all their flyers with their custom configuration. Plus, what to tell those flying regional/express jets or turbo's ... what to say, what to say when connecting
To be honest though, based on the carry ons I've seen most of them won't be able to fit into the bins as modeled.
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, Moderator, Information Desk, Ambassador, Alaska Airlines
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FAI
Programs: AS MVP Gold100K, AS 1MM, Maika`i Card, AGR, HH Gold, Hertz PC, Marriott Titanium LTG, CO, 7H, BA, 8E
Posts: 42,953
Wirelessly posted (beckoa's BB: Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9810; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.11+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.1.0.694 Mobile Safari/534.11+)
It will be interesting to see the airlines retrain Pax on how to turn the bags when placing overhead.
It will be interesting to see the airlines retrain Pax on how to turn the bags when placing overhead.
#13
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Programs: AS,WN,UA,B6,hotels
Posts: 4,239
There is already enough trouble with some smaller jets where the overhead bins are tiny, but underseat spaces are large (the reverse of the usual situation in bigger jets). But everyone by default tries to put big bags up top and small bags under the seat, even though the bags would fit better in those planes with the big bags under the seat and the small bags up top.
#14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, Moderator, Information Desk, Ambassador, Alaska Airlines
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FAI
Programs: AS MVP Gold100K, AS 1MM, Maika`i Card, AGR, HH Gold, Hertz PC, Marriott Titanium LTG, CO, 7H, BA, 8E
Posts: 42,953
There is already enough trouble with some smaller jets where the overhead bins are tiny, but underseat spaces are large (the reverse of the usual situation in bigger jets). But everyone by default tries to put big bags up top and small bags under the seat, even though the bags would fit better in those planes with the big bags under the seat and the small bags up top.