Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

OT: careful what you post (Ryanair suing individuals over online posts)

OT: careful what you post (Ryanair suing individuals over online posts)

Old Sep 12, 2013, 10:53 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL (for now) and Lifetime Gold, Marriott fan thanks to Bonvoy Moments
Posts: 5,112
OT: careful what you post (Ryanair suing individuals over online posts)

OT, but sort of relevant given some of the things we complain about - Ryanair suing over posts impugning its safety record and policies. Understandable as pretty serious thing to question without solid backing

http://www.irishtimes.com/business/s...ents-1.1525277
lorcancoyle is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 10:54 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,549
They've sued Internet Brands. Owner of this website!
irishguy28 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 11:39 am
  #3  
pb3
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cold Wet England
Programs: BAEC - Blue - How the once mighty have fallen
Posts: 363
Originally Posted by irishguy28
They've sued Internet Brands. Owner of this website!
This has been going on for quite a while now.

IIRC Ryanair did not sue Internet Brands, but rather went to court in the US seeking to identify various individuals who had posted on Pprune wrt RyanAir. Internet Brands promptly supplied the information.

Some of the individuals in question subsquently posted apologies to Ryanair on Pprune, in addition to identifying themselves and their connection (if any) to the company.

I believe the thread on Pprune has been closed/removed - and so I imagine will this one if it starts to stray into dangerous territory

I was wondering what had become of this. Some of the court cases were due to be start shortly IIRC.
pb3 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 11:44 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,549
"It had also issued proceedings against Internet Brands in California, the registered owner of the PPRuNe.org site, and issued supoenas against Yahoo, Microsoft and Google in pursuit of information."
irishguy28 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 12:50 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Glasgow, UK
Programs: BA, UA, Marriot
Posts: 2,196
There's clearly a difference between making unsubstantiated claims about things like safety records and people voicing opinion of what an awful carrier Ryanair is based on personal experience.
The former is clearly getting into dangerous territory and could clearly lead to legal remedies to protect the airline's reputation and ultimately its income and in my opinion it is fair for the airline to take an necessary steps to do so.
The latter however is and always will remain fair game.
Captain Schmidt is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 5:06 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
Originally Posted by Captain Schmidt
There's clearly a difference between making unsubstantiated claims about things like safety records and people voicing opinion of what an awful carrier Ryanair is based on personal experience.
The concern is what happens when the line between the two is not so clear, and the cost of litigation is too high for a small internet firm to risk defending its side and its users.

If the action is lodged in Dublin at least the SPEECH Act will make it difficult to enforce against Internet Brands in the US.
Calchas is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 5:11 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,549
Originally Posted by Calchas
If the action is lodged in Dublin at least the SPEECH Act will make it difficult to enforce against Internet Brands in the US.
9 cases have been initiated so far in Ireland; cases have been or are being brought in other jurisdictions (South Africa was mentioned as one; the US will likely be another as they have hired consultants there).
irishguy28 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 5:14 pm
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,167
I shall need to watch what I say about Aerolineas Argentinas and the K woman over on the Argentina forum.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 6:25 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atherton, CA
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP; Owner, Green Bay Packers
Posts: 21,691
Cool

Originally Posted by HIDDY
I shall need to watch what I say about Aerolineas Argentinas and the K woman over on the Argentina forum.
Is anyone at Aerolineas competent enough to file a suit?
Doc Savage is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 6:33 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Detroit; Formerly Dubai
Posts: 3,652
I don't always love the US, but as an attorney who has dealt with both UK and US libel laws, I have to say that the US version of libel is far better.
Dubai Stu is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 6:37 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Left
Programs: FT
Posts: 7,285
I am curious. What damages does an airline suffer when an anonymous person on the Internet makes false comments about the airline in a place where the vast majority of said businesses customers do not know about or frequent. Sure, they might have a claim but a claim without damages is sort of a a waste. Why not focus on using those fees on the lawyers to install your lavatories with a means to allow access only upon payment.
mkjr is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 7:55 pm
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,167
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
Is anyone at Aerolineas competent enough to file a suit?
Yes it's happened before.......however they arrived so late for the hearing the case was thrown out of court.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 9:21 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: Marriott Titanium, National EE
Posts: 536
so is Ryanair also ok with us sueing them for all the misleading ads or statements they have made?

I can't speak about the blog posts but after watching the Channel 4 documentary, I don't see it as implausible and I haven't seen any hard evidence from Ryanair refuting the claim the documentary made.
zerolife is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 9:57 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Programs: Aeroplan Diamond, SPG Plat, Hilton Gold, Marriott
Posts: 1,839
Originally Posted by Captain Schmidt
There's clearly a difference between making unsubstantiated claims about things like safety records and people voicing opinion of what an awful carrier Ryanair is based on personal experience.
The former is clearly getting into dangerous territory and could clearly lead to legal remedies to protect the airline's reputation and ultimately its income and in my opinion it is fair for the airline to take an necessary steps to do so.
The latter however is and always will remain fair game.
Good point. Safety is a far more serious than service. I would not take the flight if I don't feel safe.
Cana2013 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2013, 11:42 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,797
It's kind of like Etihad banning discussion on Pprune. If they'll go to such great lengths to hide discussion of their safety, what exactly is it they have got to hide?

Puts me off both of them.
1010101 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.