Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

"Flight" -- Starring Denzel Washington. Directed by Robert Zemeckis

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

"Flight" -- Starring Denzel Washington. Directed by Robert Zemeckis

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2012, 3:43 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London, England, United Kingdom
Programs: Marriott (Lifetime Titantium), whatever other programs as benefits make sense.
Posts: 1,920
Initial preview link is dead, so here is an new one: Flight movie preview.

Zemeckis has a thing for plane crashes, doesn't he?

Gimme Shelter is an awesome song. Hope they don't just use it in the trailer, but in the film as well.
GregWTravels is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012, 6:28 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Programs: SPG Gold, Delta Platinum
Posts: 528
Originally Posted by camjr
And at the end of the day, Tom Hanks STILL DELIVERED THE FED-EX PACKAGE ^
I always thought the lady who got the package opened it and said "My satellite phone finally arrived! And look, the battery still works! Thanks, mister!"
DrMaturin is offline  
Old Oct 28, 2012, 7:05 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not in DFW
Posts: 2,007
Originally Posted by WHBM
Range of nonsenses

Not at all. There are so many aspects of impossibility of flying an MD80 inverted like that, starting with the fact that to fly inverted, level, you need the nose up at about 20 degrees - look at a stunt plane at an airshow. The fuel flow would quit in a moment as the fuel outlet from the bottom of the tank would now be at the top (an aerobatic plane needs a special aerobatic fuel system to overcome this) - need I go on ?

Didn't the same actor appear in pretty much the same script about a train not long ago - "Unstoppable" ? That was a load of inane bo11ocks from beginning to end as well.
Inane bo11ocks however based on a true story but with slightly less dramatic stunts. The true story did have true life heroes and a dummy who let a train of hazardous get away in the first place.
MissJoeyDFW is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2012, 9:52 am
  #34  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 210
V

Late-night screenings of Flight start in the United States today.

What say you, FTers?

A realistic thrill ride?

Too much man vs. demons, not enough man v. machine?

Does John Goodman steal the show?
PaulKarl is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2012, 4:31 pm
  #35  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CHA, MAN;
Programs: Delta DM 1 MM; Hz PC
Posts: 11,169
Well leaving in the next 10 minutes to have dinner with the wifey and then see the movie in North Kansas City. I will give y'all a report later.
GRALISTAIR is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2012, 9:25 pm
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CHA, MAN;
Programs: Delta DM 1 MM; Hz PC
Posts: 11,169
OMG - the wife nearly walked out. No wonder it was R Rated. The first 30 seconds there is naked butt crack, naked breasts and even magic triangle. The first 10 minutes I thought it was going to be a soft porn flick. There were numerous lines of coke being snorted and even a heroin injection.

I would have liked to see more planes. The NTSB trial was not as bad as I thought it would be. Glad I went to see it. If this does not get Denzel an Oscar, it will at least get him an Oscar nomination.
GRALISTAIR is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2012, 9:45 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas, USA
Programs: AA, Delta, Singapore Airlines
Posts: 701
Originally Posted by GRALISTAIR
OMG - the wife nearly walked out. No wonder it was R Rated. The first 30 seconds there is naked butt crack, naked breasts and even magic triangle. The first 10 minutes I thought it was going to be a soft porn flick. There were numerous lines of coke being snorted and even a heroin injection.

I would have liked to see more planes. The NTSB trial was not as bad as I thought it would be. Glad I went to see it. If this does not get Denzel an Oscar, it will at least get him an Oscar nomination.
Breasts?! YES! SCORE! ^

Sorry your wife nearly walked out, though...... :/

And how realistic was the plane....you-know-what?
RussianTexan is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2012, 9:50 pm
  #38  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CHA, MAN;
Programs: Delta DM 1 MM; Hz PC
Posts: 11,169
Originally Posted by RussianTexan
Breasts?! YES! SCORE! ^
Sorry your wife nearly walked out, though...... :/
And how realistic was the plane....you-know-what?
Well never mind the breasts -when I saw magic triangle I thought wow - soft core porn flick here.

The plane and the invert etc was not too bad. The FAs were amazing - they are rarely that pretty on the flights I take.
GRALISTAIR is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2012, 11:19 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SAN
Posts: 2,426
Life in Hollywood

Went to see Flight this evening, and, coincidentally, there was an unannounced, live Q and A after the movie with the writer, John Gatins, and the director, Robert Zemekis. This kind of thing doesn't happen everywhere.

Writer has been working on the script for 11 years and had hoped to direct it himself but couldn't get it made. Zemekis and Denzil both saw the script at the about the same time and independently expressed interest. At least that's the story. The writer is a nervous flyer and had been interacting with pilots a lot for prior project. He said that this was the first time that he actually thought about pilots as human beings; before that he had never been comfotable about thinking a pilot was anything other than an anonymous, totally upstanding, unflawed entity. He suddenly had the idea of writing a story about an alcoholic pilot.

Regarding the crash itself, he initially was planning to model the crash on the "Al Haynes 1989 crash" (UA 232; Sioux City). In doing research, one of the pilots he was consulting with told hime that he should really be looking at the Alaska Air Crash over the Pacific (flight 261, 2000). This served as the model for the crash in the movie. The writer said hs spent a lot of time reading NTSB reports and listening to black box recordings.

For filming, an airplane set was built on a "rotisserie" so that they could film right-side-up and inverted. Plus a lot of CGI.

Many other questions answered as well. Some of them spoilers.
schwarm is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 12:11 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: ONT or LAX
Programs: IHG Platinum, AA
Posts: 11
Originally Posted by t325
Who knew anyone actually watched Soul Plane?
I saw Soul Plane in the theatre with my buddy wearing Camelbaks loaded full of rum mixed with blue Gatorade. Sadly, after 2 litres apiece of our tube-fed noxious hydrating substance the movie still wasn't enjoyable and we left early. I'm proud to say I've grown up a little bit since those days.

Originally Posted by PaulKarl
And now the information you really want.

The hot flight attendant is played by Nadine Velazquez, an actress who has mostly done television work including a recurring stint on My Name Is Earl. Looks like she's starting to land movie roles.

And she was in Chasing Papi, which is the Fairchild Semiconductor of scorching hot Latina actresses.
A bit of a man-face on this one, but that's just my careful perspective. After working as an airline caterer and seeing countless transvestite FA's that "let their guard down" while the plane sits on the ramp...; Never judge a book by its curves, that's all.
JacknCokePlease is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 10:11 am
  #41  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CHA, MAN;
Programs: Delta DM 1 MM; Hz PC
Posts: 11,169
As I have said on another thread " This should at least get an Oscar nod". I thought Denzel's performance showing a flawed hero was excellent.
GRALISTAIR is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2012, 7:38 am
  #42  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
I saw it last Sunday and was very happy with it. The plane crash sequence is extremely intense and the portrayal of Denzel as a high functioning alcoholic and the morality study there is excellent. Nice turn by John Goodman too in only three scenes. I hope it gets an Oscar Nod myself. I'd give it a 3.5 out of 4.
CMK10 is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2012, 12:35 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: CCU
Posts: 51
Anyone noticed the cause of catastrophic failure is the same as this real life incident? the moment they showed it in the NTSB investigation it struck me, as it was featured in a Discovery channel program.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Airlines_Flight_261
crazyflier is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2012, 4:29 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,178
Originally Posted by crazyflier
Anyone noticed the cause of catastrophic failure is the same as this real life incident?
The visuals of a non-specific DC9 variant were very accurate, though it didn't match any one exactly. However, ALL of the descriptions and depictions of how the aircraft systems operated were completely wrong. A few examples...

*DC9s do not have fuel jettison systems
*The DC9 hydraulic controls are on the first officer's lower-left instrument panel, not the overhead panel
*The elevators are not hydraulically powered
*There are no flight control disconnect handles
*Pulling a fire handle to arm, then discharge, the engine fire protection would cutoff the fuel, hydraulics, electrics, and pneumatics to that engine and the engine would be shut down
*The jack-screw moves the stabilizer, not the elevator.

The idea that flying faster through the thunderstorm also made no sense at all and would have made things much worse, not better. Slowing to the applicable rough-air speed would lessen the impact of the turbulence.
LarryJ is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2012, 9:05 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England.
Programs: BA
Posts: 8,476
Originally Posted by crazyflier
Anyone noticed the cause of catastrophic failure is the same as this real life incident?
Um, no we didn't, because it wasn't.

The glorification of major fatal accidents for commercial gain of film producers is one of the tawdry and sordid aspects of B-movie Hollywood. It's not a documentary and thus you don't expect accuracy, but they will take these misfortunate events and tart them up for maximum "impact". I suppose if you are some uneducated hick from the boondocks you can get your thrills from such films, and will pay money to see this sort of thing.

No accuracy, and no respect for those involved in the incident that gave them the idea. An Oscar ? Has this award really descended to such depths ?
WHBM is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.