Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Ever leave the gate on reverse thrust?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Ever leave the gate on reverse thrust?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2012, 11:29 am
  #1  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 523
Ever leave the gate on reverse thrust?

The year was about 1987. I don't remember the airport.

I think the aircraft was a 737-200; it had the old cigar-shaped engines with the thrust reversers like this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...t_reverser.jpg

For whatever reason, they must not have had a tug. We backed out of our gate on reverse thrust.

Noisy and cool.

How common was this practice...I only experienced it once although I've never been a road warrior type.
Flubber2012 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2012, 8:41 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 64 miles North of SFO
Posts: 139
Yeah, I was on a DC-9/ MD 80 in DFW about 10 years ago when the Capt. rocked the A/c forward and then blasted us backwards with reverse thrust.
Not a comforting thing for the pax!

They finally figured out that between discomfort for the pax and FOD ingestion in the engines, t wasn't such a good idea.
Bwillis is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2012, 9:27 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: YYZ
Posts: 2,636
Can't easily post the links but there are some videos of powerbacks on YouTube.
evanderm is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2012, 10:04 pm
  #4  
Senior Moderator and Moderator: American AAdvantage & TravelBuzz
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 10,416
I personally haven't experience it before. To read up on the topic more, I went to the ever-trusty Google and actually ran into this thread from many years ago, which has experiences from other FTers: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...e-anymore.html
JY1024 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2012, 10:10 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
An Engineering Standpoint on the Issue

In all my years of flying even on some of the older aircraft (dc9, dc10, l1011) i have never seen such a phenomena
noampaz93 is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2012, 10:19 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Federal Way, WA
Programs: Mileage Plus 2P, Marriott Silver, many others
Posts: 1,305
It was common practice for a short time, but mostly limited to aircraft with tail-mounted engines. The move could only be done at certain airports because the taxiway or ramp behind the plane had to be unobstructed. I never did it at ORD, for example, but it was common practice at OMA.
dliesse is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2012, 10:24 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Groveland, FL, USA
Programs: Starriot Platinum, DL PM, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 1,041
Eastern Airlines used to do this often with their 727s in ATL. Maybe it was believed to be cheaper than paying for extra unionized (IAM) ground personnel in an age of relatively cheap fuel.
rtpflyer is online now  
Old Mar 3, 2012, 10:31 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,353
Reverse thrust at the gate was one of the causes of the Air Florida crash at DCA in 1982 -- in that case, they had a tug that was slipping, and tried to use the engines to help back away, eventually getting a tug with chains when that failed. Unfortunately, the snow and ice sucked into the engines resulted in false readings from the engine power probes.

I'm sure it's perfectly safe with tail mounted engines and perhaps some wing mounted ones in the right conditions, but I suspect there are significant restrictions on when and how it's used now.
jmastron is online now  
Old Mar 4, 2012, 1:35 am
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,098
I may be wrong, but I think only the MD series of aircraft are really capable of doing this. It may be possible in theory though for any jet aircraft with reverse thrust can do it..
pinworm is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2012, 7:16 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: UA AA MR HH B6
Posts: 1,419
I've had this a few times, I believe all on Mexicana 727 in Mexico City.
closetasfan is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2012, 7:44 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: CLT
Posts: 181
IIRC, once as a pax on either AA or CO back in the '80s.

As a mechanic; been involved in a couple for various reasons. Generally during overnight hours, and ramp service has taken the pushback equipment elsewhere on the concourse.

From experience, doing a powerback is a tricky operation (and can be a tad hair-raising) due to not being able to see anything that might get in the way, and the possibility of a tail stand when applying the brakes while rolling backwards (tip: completely close the T/Rs before lightly tapping the brakes).
CLTmech is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2012, 8:49 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: YYZ
Posts: 2,636
Here's a video. Plenty more in related videos http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop...kA0xr96Y&gl=CA
evanderm is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2012, 8:55 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CHA, MAN;
Programs: Delta DM 1 MM; Hz PC
Posts: 11,169
Once and once only. It was a Continental flight about 8 years ago.
GRALISTAIR is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2012, 9:31 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DCA
Programs: FB Gold Privilege
Posts: 413
The C-17 does an impressive job with pushing back on its own power.
fjord is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2012, 10:58 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB Silver going for Gold
Posts: 21,796
Originally Posted by CLTmech
and the possibility of a tail stand when applying the brakes while rolling backwards (tip: completely close the T/Rs before lightly tapping the brakes).
I thought the proceudre was to apply forward thrust and get the a/c rolling forward before applying brakes. My only experience I can remember is AA MD-80s as DFW.
YVR Cockroach is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.