Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Circular runways

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Circular runways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2017, 8:49 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SFO/SMF
Programs: Holder of six "persona non-grata" awards
Posts: 1,914
Circular runways

Apologies if this link/story has already been shared:

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-39643292

Pretty cool idea, no?
fozziedoggie is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 9:23 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: LH SEN; BA Gold
Posts: 8,405
Wrong forum and IMO impractical in real life.
WorldLux is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 10:46 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,005
I think it's best summed up in one part of his response.

It is a bit far-fetched, I know
Just about every airport on the planet is built in a certain way. Are you going to now train every pilot in 2 ways of doing something? Only have certain pilots that could land at this one/subset of airports? Rebuild every airport overnight?

The gasoline engine is far from the best solution for driving. Many better solutions have arisen over the decades. But the road/gas station/gas pipelines/regulatory/etc. infrastructure make it much, much more difficult than "let's just start throwing hydrogen fuel cells in every car" and everything is good.
CPRich is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 7:57 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Originally Posted by CPRich
I think it's best summed up in one part of his response.



Just about every airport on the planet is built in a certain way. Are you going to now train every pilot in 2 ways of doing something? Only have certain pilots that could land at this one/subset of airports? Rebuild every airport overnight?

The gasoline engine is far from the best solution for driving. Many better solutions have arisen over the decades. But the road/gas station/gas pipelines/regulatory/etc. infrastructure make it much, much more difficult than "let's just start throwing hydrogen fuel cells in every car" and everything is good.
I have a bigger problem with it--it makes you put the plane down at a much more precise point than a normal runway. If you have 10,000' of runway and need 6,000' that means you can put it down anywhere in the first 4,000'. With this you have a much narrower window and thus much less ability to land in bad conditions. It would also probably be basically unusable to low-time GA pilots.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2017, 1:58 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: LAX
Posts: 42
The big problem is the wind. As you go around the circle you would have to be constantly adjusting your heading relative to the runway curve to adjust for the wind angle changing and even worse, your ground speed in the air and air speed on the ground would be constantly changing as you move from head wind to cross wind to tail wind etc.
Gullywhumper is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2017, 11:29 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: RNO
Programs: AA/DL/UA
Posts: 10,770
I would have a hard time coming up with an idea as stupid as this one.
Kevin AA is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2017, 12:30 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 193
I prefer to keep the wings mostly level at low speeds. Landing on a circular runway does not keep the wings level
shaner82 is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2017, 9:11 am
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,565
I have an idea: let's take flying, something that is currently ridiculously safe in part thanks to worldwide standards and common procedures, and look for really goofy ways to make it unnecessarily more dangerous!
pinniped is online now  
Old Apr 24, 2017, 12:21 pm
  #9  
ryw
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATL
Programs: DL GM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,240
Also the big circle runs into problems if your traffic grows and you need to expand the terminal space...a lot easier to expand terminal/runway/apron space with straight runways rather than the circle.
ryw is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2017, 12:53 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC
Posts: 6,091
I recall reading this somewhere about a month ago, thought it was FT, but for the life of me, can't find a thread about it.

I do appreciate the attempt at innovation. Although this may be doomed to fail as a viable idea, hopefully it does spur some additional feasible innovations.
gobluetwo is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2017, 6:16 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: South Florida
Programs: DL Skymiles KE Skypass
Posts: 2,362
Originally Posted by gobluetwo
I recall reading this somewhere about a month ago, thought it was FT, but for the life of me, can't find a thread about it.

I do appreciate the attempt at innovation. Although this may be doomed to fail as a viable idea, hopefully it does spur some additional feasible innovations.
Do you read Crankyflier? He had this as one of his "3 Links I Love" columns:

http://crankyflier.com/2017/03/24/3-...ulous-ratings/
teddybear99 is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2017, 8:52 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC
Posts: 6,091
Originally Posted by teddybear99
Do you read Crankyflier? He had this as one of his "3 Links I Love" columns:

http://crankyflier.com/2017/03/24/3-...ulous-ratings/
I do, actually. That may have been it, but I thought there was more debate than what is in the comments section. Probably conflating it with another topic.
gobluetwo is offline  
Old Apr 24, 2017, 8:53 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: RNO
Programs: AA/DL/UA
Posts: 10,770
The only advantage of this is that it would probably remove the 739 from the skies. That plane can barely get off the ground and land as it is. Having to bank at the same time (which reduces lift) means having to go even faster, and increasing the chance of a tail strike.
Kevin AA is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2017, 12:08 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,394
This type of article reminds me of local sports radio hosts who have to drum up something to talk about for 4 hours....when they set up a straw man argument just to have something to talk about to fill time (or generate website hits in this case)

Host 1: Some people are saying that <local team player who is league average> is the best/worst in the league.

Host 2: Wow, that's crazy, I have been hearing that too...I didn't even believe it

Host 1: I know right, lets knock down the fictional argument that no one is making for the next hour until <local team's> back up Long Snapper will join us to talk the NFL Draft.
kop84 is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2017, 12:23 pm
  #15  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,565
Originally Posted by teddybear99
Do you read Crankyflier? He had this as one of his "3 Links I Love" columns:

http://crankyflier.com/2017/03/24/3-...ulous-ratings/
LOL. The only thing sillier than the runways is that Tempkin PR release. On a positive note, it appears that US Airways' customer satisfaction gains in 2016 have it well-poised to pass Airtran in 2017.

That actually may be the best way for a U.S. airline to increase its goodwill with the public: stop existing at all for a couple years.
pinniped is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.